scholarly journals Cohort profile: a data linkage cohort to examine health service profiles of people with intellectual disability in New South Wales, Australia

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. e015627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Reppermund ◽  
Preeyaporn Srasuebkul ◽  
Theresa Heintze ◽  
Rebecca Reeve ◽  
Kimberlie Dean ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e031624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Reppermund ◽  
Theresa Heintze ◽  
Preeyaporn Srasuebkul ◽  
Rebecca Reeve ◽  
Kimberlie Dean ◽  
...  

PurposePeople with intellectual disability (ID) experience high rates of physical and mental health problems, while access to appropriate healthcare is often poor. This cohort was established to develop an epidemiological profile related to the health, health service use, disability services, mortality and corrective services records of people with ID.ParticipantsThe cohort contains 92 542 people with ID (40% females) with a median age of 23 years (IQR: 12–43 years) and 2 004 475 people with a neuropsychiatric or developmental disorder diagnosis (50% females) with a median age of 51 years (IQR: 29–73 years) from New South Wales, Australia. The whole sample contains records for 2 097 017 individuals with most data sets spanning financial years 1 July 2001 to 30 June 2016. A wide range of data from linked population data sets are included in the areas of disability, health, corrective services and targeted specialist support services in public schools, Public Guardian and Ombudsman services.Findings to dateThis study includes one of the largest cohorts of people with ID internationally. Our data have shown that the presence of ID is significantly associated with emergency department presentations and psychiatric readmissions after the first psychiatric admission based on a subcohort of people with a psychiatric admission. Adults with ID experience premature mortality and over-representation of potentially avoidable deaths compared with the general population.Future plansWithin the health service system, we will examine different components, that is, inpatient, emergency adult services, children and younger people services and costs associated with healthcare as well as mortality, cause and predictors of death. The neuropsychiatric and developmental disorders comparison cohort allows comparisons of the physical health, mental health and service use profiles of people with ID and those with other neuropsychiatric disorders.


2021 ◽  
pp. 103985622110142
Author(s):  
Jessica A Walsh ◽  
Janelle Weise ◽  
Claire Eagleson ◽  
Julian N Trollor ◽  
Rachael C Cvejic

Objective: To identify and reach consensus on the priorities and operation of an adult tertiary intellectual disability mental health service in New South Wales, Australia. Method: An online Delphi consultation was conducted with 25 intellectual disability mental health experts. Results: Participants agreed that the service should involve a multidisciplinary team and accept people with an intellectual disability aged over 15 years with complex needs and/or atypical presentations. Agreed service roles included short-term assessment, diagnosis and treatment, providing high-level clinical advice, and capacity building. Endorsed principles and practical ways of working align with existing guidelines. Conclusions: This study describes experts’ views on how an adult tertiary intellectual disability mental health service should operate in New South Wales. Further consultation is needed to determine the views of people with an intellectual disability and mental health staff.


2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M Dinh ◽  
Kendall J Bein ◽  
John Delaney ◽  
Saartje Berendsen Russell ◽  
Tim Royle

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (12) ◽  
pp. 2101-2101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Mitchell ◽  
Lara A. Harvey ◽  
Henry Brodaty ◽  
Brian Draper ◽  
Jacqueline C. T. Close

The authors would like to apologise for a typographical error in the abstract of the above mentioned article.In the results section of the abstract on the first page of the article, the first odds ratio that refers to ‘aged care facilities’ should be (OR 5.44; 95% CI 4.43–6.67) and the second odds ratio that refers to health service facilities should be (OR 4.56; 95%CI 4.06–5.13).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document