Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients 60 years or older with epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Bauknecht ◽  
A. Hefti ◽  
G. Morack ◽  
C. Villena-Heinsen ◽  
D. Wallwiener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

This phase II study evaluated the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine plus cisplatin as first-line treatment of patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Chemonaive patients ≥60-year-old with FIGO stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were enrolled. Patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 on day 1 (before cisplatin) and day 8 of a 21-day cycle. Of 44 female patients (median age, 70 years), 72.7% had stage IIIC disease and 67.4% had a Karnofsky performance status ≥80. Of the 37 response-evaluable patients (35 with measurable lesion[s] ≥2 cm), there were seven (18.9%) pathologic complete responses, two (5.4%) pathologic partial responses, two (5.4%) clinical complete responses, and 12 (32.4%) clinical partial responses, for an overall response rate of 62.2% (95% CI, 44.8%–77.5%), and a pathologic response rate of 24.3% (95% CI, 11.8%–41.2%). Median survival was 27.7 months (95% CI, 14.3–40.8 months). Grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 59.5% and 30.2% of patients, respectively, with neutropenic fever in one patient. Grade 3 nausea /vomiting and alopecia occurred in 25.6% and 9.5% of patients, respectively. We conclude that gemcitabine plus cisplatin is active and feasible as first-line treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in patients ≥60 years. Further clinical trials adding gemcitabine to current standard, first-line treatment seem warranted in younger as well as older patients.

Gemcitabine combined with cisplatin as first-line treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a phase II study

2003 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Belpomme ◽  
I Krakowski ◽  
M Beauduin ◽  
T Petit ◽  
J.L Canon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

scholarly journals Phase II study of DHP107 (oral paclitaxel) in the first-line treatment of HER2-negative recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (OPTIMAL study)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592110619
Author(s):  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
Jae Hong Seo ◽  
Jin-Hee Ahn ◽  
Tae-Yong Kim ◽  
Seok Yun Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background: Standard intravenous (IV) paclitaxel is associated with hypersensitivity/toxicity. Alternative IV formulations have improved tolerability but still require frequent hospital visits and IV infusion. DHP107 is a novel oral formulation of paclitaxel that is approved in South Korea for the treatment of gastric cancer. Methods: This multicenter, phase II study using a Simon’s two-stage design investigated the efficacy and safety of DHP107 200 mg/m2 administered orally twice daily on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks for the first-line treatment of recurrent or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled and 31 were assessable for efficacy. Patient median age was 57 years (range = 34–81) and 11 (31%) had triple-negative disease. A median of seven cycles (range = 1–28) of DHP107 was administered. Objective response rate was 55% (17 patients), all partial responses, according to the investigator’s decision and independent central review (ICR), and 44% (4/9 patients) in those with triple-negative disease. Disease control rate (partial response and stable disease) was 74% (23 patients) according to the investigator’s decision and ICR. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population of all enrolled participants, the objective response rate was 50% (18/36 patients). Median progression-free survival was 8.9 months [95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.2–12.3) and median time to treatment failure was 8.0 months (95% CI: 4.2–10.0). DHP107 had an acceptable toxicity profile. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events; the most common adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (81% all grades and 78% grade ⩾ 3) followed by peripheral sensory neuropathy (61% all grades and 8% grade 3). However, there was no febrile neutropenia or sepsis. Conclusion: DHP107 showed promising efficacy and acceptable tolerability in this phase II study and is currently being investigated in the OPTIMAL phase III study (NCT03315364). Trial registration: This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03315364.

CETUFTIRI, a new combination of UFT with leucovorin (LV), irinotecan, and cetuximab as first-line treatment for patients (pts) with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Preliminary results from a multicenter phase II trial

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4087-4087 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bennouna ◽  
R. Faroux ◽  
E. François ◽  
C. Ligeza ◽  
C. El Hannani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
New Combination ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Egfr Expression ◽  
First Line Treatment

4087 Background: A phase II study (ASCO 2004) established that the combination of UFT (tegafur-uracil) with LV and irinotecan (TEGAFIRI) could be safely administered to pts with unresectable mCRC, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 34% and a median time to progression (TTP) of 5.7 months. We initiated CETUFTIRI, a phase II study, to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cetuximab added to TEGAFIRI in chemonaïve pts with unresectable mCRC. Methods: Patients in this single-stage study were aged =18 years, with histologically or cytologically confirmed, bidimensionally measurable mCRC, ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and adequate bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function. EGFR expression was not an inclusion criterion. Treatment consisted of UFT 250 mg/m2/day d1–14, LV 90 mg/day d1–14, and irinotecan 250 mg/m2 d1 every 3 weeks, plus cetuximab 400 mg/m2 week 1 then 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter. The primary endpoint was ORR and the planned sample size was 61 pts. The study is now closed to accrual. Results: To date, 48 patients are evaluable for safety and 31 are evaluable for efficacy. Patient characteristics (n=48): median age 65 years (range 45–84 years); ECOG PS 0/1: 73/27%; male 65%; tumor sites: colon 69%; rectum 17%; junction 14%; liver metastasis 83%; lung metastasis 46%; other 27%. Adverse events per patient (n=48) after a total of 230 cycles were: grade G3 mucositis 10%; G3/4 neutropenia 10%; G3 nausea/vomiting 8%; G3 asthenia 6%; febrile neutropenia 6%; G3 hypokalemia 6%; G3/4 anemia 4%; G3 diarrhea 2%; acne-like rash G1/2 50% (G3 4%); infusion- related reaction to cetuximab 6%. Two of 31 evaluable pts had a complete response and 11 had a partial response, for an ORR of 42%; 5 pts had stable disease (16%) and 11 pts had progressive disease (35.5%). An independent radiologist review is planned for all 61 pts included up to December 2006. Conclusions: The CETUFTIRI combination seems to have an acceptable toxicity profile with an attractive objective response rate in the first-line treatment of pts with mCRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study of bortezomib with cisplatin as first-line treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM): EORTC 08052.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7081-7081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary O'Brien ◽  
Rabab Mohamed Gaafar ◽  
Sanjaykumar Popat ◽  
Francesco Grossi ◽  
Allan Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

7081 Background: Cisplatin is one of the most active drugs available in MPM while bortezomib has shown some activity in single agent phase II studies against MPM. This was a prospective phase II study of cisplatin and bortezomib (CB) in the first line treatment of MPM. Methods: Patients with histological proven MPM, with performance status (PS) 0/1, were eligible. The doses were cisplatin 75mg/m2 /3 wks and bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 day 1, 4, 8, 11 every 3 wks. The primary end-point was progression free survival rate at 18 wks (PFSR=18). The 2-stage Simon design (a=0.1; b = 0.05, P0=0.50 and P1=0.675) was used. In the first step of the study 37 eligible patients were planned. If more than 19 patients were alive and free of progression at 18 wks the total sample size was increased to 76 eligible patients. Results: Between 2007 and 2010 82 patients were entered. The median follow-up time is 32.3 months The median age was 55 years (range: 22-77yrs), male/female: 55/27 , PS 0/1: 9/73, Stage T1: 10%; T2: 42%, T3: 25%; T4: 23% and N0: 57%; N1: 4%; N2: 33%; N3: 6%. The median number of cycles received was 4 and 38% received 6 cycles. Cisplatin/ bortezomib dose intensity was 98/ 80%. Toxicity (grade 3/4): neutropenia 10%, thrombocytopenia 11%, anaemia 1%. Grade 3-4 hyponatraemia/ hypokalaemia occurred in 46/ and 17%. Grade 2 tinnitus, grade 3 fatigue occurred in 16%, and 12%, of patients. Motor/sensory/other neurotoxicity was grade 1: 6/28/7%, grade 2: 2/26/2% and grade 3: 1/7/2% respectively. There were 2 toxic deaths at 32 and 74 days due to acute pneumonitis and cardiac arrest. The PFRS-18 (including symptomatic progression) was 53% (80% confidence intervals, CI, 42-64%). The overall survival was 13.5 months (95% CI 10.5-15) with 56% (95% CI 44-66%) alive at 1 year. The PFS was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.3-6.5). Conclusions: On the basis of the PFRS-18, the null hypothesis could not be rejected, although CB gave predictable toxicity and was as active as other reported regimens in MPM.

Phase II study of nimotuzumab combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin as the first-line treatment in patients with local advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC): An interim analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14604-e14604
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Zhang ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jing Gao ◽  
Xicheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

e14604 Background: Nimotuzumab is a genetically engineered humanized antibody (mAb) that recognizes an epitope located in the extracellular domain of human EGFR. Evidences have shown that nimotuzumab is effective and safe in SCCHN. The combination of paclitaxel/cisplatin (TP) is a standard regimen for advanced or metastatic ESCC. This open uncontrolled phase II study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab in combination with TP as the first-line treatment in advanced ESCC. Methods: All patients have histology/cytology confirmed advanced or metastatic ESCC with ECOG PS 0-2. The treatment plan is as the following: paclitaxel administered intravenously (IV) 175 mg/m2 on d1 and cisplatin IV 30-35mg/ m2/d on d1-2, every 21 days for 6 cycles, and nimotuzumab IV 200mg weekly. For patients with stable disease (SD) and better, nimotuzumab will be given continuously after 6 cycles of TP. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (RR) with 56 patients enrollment (target RR >60%); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety/ tolerability. The coordinations between EGFR and ERCC1 with response of treatment will be analyzed. Results: Up to date, 25 patients (male/female, 20/5; median age 58) have been enrolled. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and 22 are evaluable for response. 14 (63.6%) had a confirmed partial response (PR) and 7 (31.8%) had SD as their best responses with disease control rate of 95.4%. Only one patient had progressive disease (PD). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, neutropenic fever and anemia occurred in 52.2%, 4% and 13% respectively. Nonhematological toxicities were generally mild with grade 1 or 2 alopecie, hypodynamia, anorexia, nausea, arthralgia, and itch of skin occurring in 80%, 60.9%, 43.5%, 34.8%, 30.4%, and 21.7%. One patient had a grade 3 haematuria. Conclusions: The interim analysis showed that the combination of nimotuzumab with TP is tolerated reasonably well in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC and encouraging efficacy. The study is ongoing with coordination of biomarkers and response as well.

Sequential gemcitabine–carboplatin followed by paclitaxel–carboplatin in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: A phase II study

2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 114-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna U. Mäenpää ◽  
Seija E. Grénman ◽  
Jyrki T. Jalkanen ◽  
Tapio A. Kuoppala ◽  
Arto O. Leminen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

The impact of cetuximab on the capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) combination in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): A randomized phase II trial of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3551-3551 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Borner ◽  
W. Mingrone ◽  
D. Koeberle ◽  
R. Von Moos ◽  
D. Rauch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
High Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Clinical Cancer Research ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Line Treatment

3551 Background: XELOX is a valuable alternative to continuous infusion FOLFOX type regimens in the treatment of MCC (Borner et al, JCO 2002, 1759). Cetuximab is an EGFR antibody, which has been shown to improve the efficacy of chemotherapy. A phase II study in first-line treatment of MCC has demonstrated a high response rate combining cetuximab with FOLFOX (Tabernero et al, Proc ASCO 2004, 3512). Methods: Multicenter, randomized two-arm phase II trial: OXA 130 mg/m2 day 1 and oral CAP 1000 mg/m2 bid days 1–14 every 21 days alone or in combination with cetuximab 250 mg/m2 weekly after a loading dose of 400 mg/m2. Treatment was limited to a maximum of 6 cycles. With 37 patients in each arm, the power was 90% to select the truly better arm if the true between-arm difference in response rate (RECIST) is at least 15%. The study was open for accrual until October 2005. Results: We present here the results of 74 patients included in the study. In 67 patients the first response data are available (investigators’ assessment after 3 cycles). The two arms are well balanced for relevant patient, disease and treatment characteristics. The study treatment was well tolerated with grade 3/4 toxicities in < 10% of the cycles in each arm. The frequency of side effects was balanced, but with more frequent skin toxicity in the cetuximab arm (6% versus 0% grade 3/4). Conclusions: Cetuximab seems to positively interact with XELOX in terms of efficacy but not toxicity. The cetuximab/XELOX combination appears to be a valuable option in first-line treatment of MCC especially if high response rates are a primary objective. This trial was supported in part by Merck KGaA and Sanofi-Aventis Switzerland. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document