EP886 Atypical endometriosis associated with ovarian malignancy

Author(s):  
N Kim ◽  
SR Hong ◽  
KT Lim ◽  
KH Lee ◽  
TJ Kim ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyeong A So ◽  
Sung Ran Hong ◽  
Nae Ri Kim ◽  
Eun Jung Yang ◽  
Seung-Hyuk Shim ◽  
...  

Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical outcome of atypical endometriosis and its association with ovarian malignancy. Methods This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with atypical endometriosis between January 2001 and December 2017. All patients had received surgical treatment for ovarian tumor. The clinical characteristics and histopathological results of all patients were reviewed. Results Atypical endometriosis was diagnosed in 101 patients. We analyzed 98 patients with a mean age of 34.8 years (range: 16–58 years). Ten patients (10.2%) had previously undergone endometriosis surgery more than once. In total, 12 (12.2%) patients had atypical endometriosis-associated ovarian malignancy—nine had carcinomas and three had borderline tumor. The tumors were pathologically classified as follows: five, clear cell carcinomas; two, endometrioid adenocarcinomas; one, mixed clear cell and endometrioid adenocarcinoma; one, seromucinous carcinoma; two, mucinous borderline tumors; and one, seromucinous borderline tumor. Conclusion Atypical endometriosis is most frequently associated with clear cell carcinoma and endometrioid adenocarcinoma. To identify the risk of ovarian malignancy and manage patients with endometriosis, diagnosing atypical endometriosis and recognizing its precancerous potential are important.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 299-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold-Jan Kruse ◽  
Henk G ter Brugge ◽  
Harm H de Haan ◽  
Hugo W Van Eyndhoven ◽  
Hans W Nijman

ObjectiveVaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an alternative strategy for patients with low-risk endometrial cancer and medical co-morbidities precluding laparoscopic or abdominal procedures. The current study evaluates the prevalence of co-existent ovarian malignancy in patients with endometrial cancer and the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on survival outcomes in these patients.MethodsMedline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and November 20, 2017 that investigated (1) the prevalence of co-existing ovarian malignancy (either metastases or primary synchronous ovarian cancer in women with endometrial cancer, and (2) the influence of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy on recurrence and/or survival rates.ResultsOf the pre-menopausal and post-menopausal patients (n=6059), 373 were identified with metastases and 106 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Of the post-menopausal patients (n=6016), 362 were identified with metastases and 44 were identified with primary synchronous ovarian cancer. Survival outcomes did not differ for pre-menopausal patients with endometrial cancer with and without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (5-year overall survival rates were 89–94.5% and 86–97.8%, respectively).ConclusionBilateral salpingo-oophorectomy during vaginal hysterectomy seems to have a limited impact on disease outcome in patients with endometrial cancer. These results support the view that vaginal hysterectomy alone or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy may be an option for patients with endometrial cancer who are not ideal surgical candidates.


2016 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesare Romagnolo ◽  
Antonette E. Leon ◽  
Aline S.C. Fabricio ◽  
Martina Taborelli ◽  
Jerry Polesel ◽  
...  

BMJ ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 349 (oct16 2) ◽  
pp. g6076-g6076
Author(s):  
I. Biliatis ◽  
N. Ratnavelu
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document