Flow modification on the internal carotid artery bifurcation region and A1 segment after M1-internal carotid artery flow diverter deployment

2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016051
Author(s):  
Federico Cagnazzo ◽  
Raed Ahmed ◽  
Pierre-Henri Lefevre ◽  
Imad Derraz ◽  
Cyril Dargazanli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Anterior Communicating Artery ◽  
Slow Flow ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Modification ◽  
Flow Diverters

BackgroundClinical and hemodynamic consequences of flow diverters extending from the M1 to the internal carotid artery (ICA), covering the A1 segment, have rarely been investigated. We aimed to provide angiographic and clinical data about flow modifications on the covered A1.MethodsConsecutive patients receiving M1-ICA flow diverters for unruptured aneurysms were collected from our prospective database (2014–2020).Results42 A1 arteries covered with a single device were studied. All patients had an angiographic detected contralateral flow from the anterior communicating artery (AcomA). Immediately after flow diversion, 20 (47.6%) covered A1 showed slow flow. During a mean angiographic follow-up of 14 months, 13 (31%) and 22 (52.3%) A1 arteries were occluded and narrowed, respectively. Flow changes were asymptomatic in all cases. Vascular risk factors, sex, oversized compared with not oversized stents, immediate A1 slow flow, age, diameter of the A1, length of follow-up, and platelet inhibition rate were tested as prognosticators of A1 occlusion. Length of the angiographic follow-up was the only predictor of A1 occlusion (p=0.005, OR=3, CI=1.4 to 6.7). There were two device related ischemic events with a 2.3% rate of morbidity (one basal ganglia infarct after coverage of the M1 perforators and one transient acute instent thrombosis).ConclusionsCovering the A1 segment during M1-ICA flow diversion seems relatively safe, if the contralateral flow is assured by the AcomA. Approximately 31% and 52% of the covered A1 showed asymptomatic occlusions and narrowing, respectively. The likelihood of flow modification was proportional to the length of follow-up. Morbidity associated with flow diversion in the ICA terminus region was 2.3%.

scholarly journals Application of flow diverters in the treatment of aneurysms in the internal carotid artery bifurcation region

2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 297-305
Author(s):  
Mostafa Mahmoud ◽  
Ahmed Farag ◽  
Mostafa Farid ◽  
Ahmed Elserwi ◽  
Amr Abdelsamad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Occlusion Rate ◽  
Flow Diverters

Introduction The treatment of aneurysms in the internal carotid bifurcation region (ICABR), including aneurysms of the true internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus, those inclined on the proximal A1 or M1 segments or at the most distal pre-bifurcation (ICA) segment, is often challenging in microsurgical clipping and endovascular surgery. Few reports had discussed flow diversion as a therapeutic option for this group. Methods This was a retrospective study analysing flow diversion in treating ICABR aneurysms. Seven patients harbouring eight aneurysms in the ICABR were treated with flow diversion. Five aneurysms were inclined on the proximal A1 segment, and three were located at the most distal pre-bifurcation segment. Patients’ demographics, presentation, procedure technical description, angiographic and clinical follow-up were recorded. PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE were also reviewed for articles published in English, including case series or case reports, for ICABR aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Results All patients except one underwent angiographic follow-up. The Karman–Byrne occlusion scale was used to determine the occlusion rate. All six patients with documented angiographic follow-up had a class IV occlusion score. No permanent or transient neurological or non-neurological complications were encountered in this study. Conclusion Treating ICABR aneurysms using flow diversion is feasible, with a promising angiographic occlusion rate. Further studies are needed to analyse long-term clinical and angiographic results.

Successful management of bilateral internal carotid artery fusiform giant aneurysms in a patient with intimal fibroplasia using multiple flow diverters: With long-term imaging follow up

2021 ◽  
pp. 159101992110491
Author(s):  
Jieun Roh ◽  
Seung Kug Baik ◽  
Jeong A Yeom ◽  
Joo-Young Na ◽  
Sang-Won Lee
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Giant Aneurysms ◽  
The Past ◽  
Effective Treatment Modality ◽  
Flow Diverters

The authors report a rare case of sequentially developed bilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) fusiform giant aneurysms in a patient with pathologically confirmed intimal fibroplasia. Both ICA fusiform aneurysms were treated with multiple flow diverter insertion and were well-managed over the past 5.5 years of follow-up. The development of aneurysms in this rare disease entity appears to be a lifelong process based on the authors’ observations in serial angiographic follow-up studies. Reconstruction therapy using flow-diverting stents in this unique condition may be a safe and effective treatment modality.

Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: 3-year follow-up results

2017 ◽  
Vol 127 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tibor Becske ◽  
Matthew B. Potts ◽  
Maksim Shapiro ◽  
David F. Kallmes ◽  
Waleed Brinjikji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration

OBJECTIVEThe long-term effectiveness of endovascular treatment of large and giant wide-neck aneurysms using traditional endovascular techniques has been disappointing, with high recanalization and re-treatment rates. Flow diversion with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) has been recently used as a stand-alone therapy for complex aneurysms, showing significant improvement in effectiveness while demonstrating a similar safety profile to stent-supported coil treatment. However, relatively little is known about its long-term safety and effectiveness. Here the authors report on the 3-year safety and effectiveness of flow diversion with the PED in a prospective cohort of patients with large and giant internal carotid artery aneurysms enrolled in the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms (PUFS) trial.METHODSThe PUFS trial is a prospective study of 107 patients with 109 aneurysms treated with the PED. Primary effectiveness and safety end points were demonstrated based on independently monitored 180-day clinical and angiographic data. Patients were enrolled in a long-term follow-up protocol including 1-, 3-, and 5-year clinical and imaging follow-up. In this paper, the authors report the midstudy (3-year) effectiveness and safety data.RESULTSAt 3 years posttreatment, 74 subjects with 76 aneurysms underwent catheter angiography as required per protocol. Overall, complete angiographic aneurysm occlusion was observed in 71 of these 76 aneurysms (93.4% cure rate). Five aneurysms were re-treated, using either coils or additional PEDs, for failure to occlude, and 3 of these 5 were cured by the 3-year follow-up. Angiographic cure with one or two treatments of Pipeline embolization alone was therefore achieved in 92.1%. No recanalization of a previously completely occluded aneurysm was noted on the 3-year angiograms. There were 3 (2.6%) delayed device- or aneurysm-related serious adverse events, none of which led to permanent neurological sequelae. No major or minor late-onset hemorrhagic or ischemic cerebrovascular events or neurological deaths were observed in the 6-month through 3-year posttreatment period. Among 103 surviving patients, 85 underwent functional outcome assessment in which modified Rankin Scale scores of 0–1 were demonstrated in 80 subjects.CONCLUSIONSPipeline embolization is safe and effective in the treatment of complex large and giant aneurysms of the intracranial internal carotid artery. Unlike more traditional endovascular treatments, flow diversion results in progressive vascular remodeling that leads to complete aneurysm obliteration over longer-term follow-up without delayed aneurysm recanalization and/or growth.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT00777088 (clinicaltrials.gov)

Flow diversion of large internal carotid artery aneurysms with the surpass device: impressions and technical nuance from the initial North American experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey P Colby ◽  
Li-Mei Lin ◽  
Justin M Caplan ◽  
Bowen Jiang ◽  
Barbara Michniewicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Aneurysm Neck ◽  
Aneurysm Embolization ◽  
Grade Ii

BackgroundFlow diversion is an important tool for treatment of cerebral aneurysms, particularly large and giant aneurysms. The Surpass flow diverter is a new system under evaluation in the USA.ObjectiveTo report our initial experience of 20 cases with the Surpass flow diverter to demonstrate its basic properties, the required triaxial delivery platform, and the methodologies used to deploy it during treatment of large internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysmsMethodsTwenty patients with ICA aneurysms ≥10 mm with ≥4 mm neck treated as part of the Surpass IntraCranial Aneurysm Embolization System Pivotal Trial (the SCENT trial; Stryker) were included. Details of patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, and technical procedures were collected.ResultsTwenty patients (mean age 63.3±1.3 years; range 51–72) with 20 unruptured aneurysms (mean size 13.4±0.9 mm; range 10–21 mm) were treated. For proximal access, 60% of cases had aortic arch ≥grade II, 55% had significant cervical ICA tortuosity, and 60% had cavernous ICA ≥grade II. The Surpass device was implanted in 19/20 (95%) cases. Of 19 cases, a single device was used in 18 cases (95%) and 2 devices in only 1 case (5%). Balloon angioplasty was performed in 8/19 cases (42%). Complete aneurysm neck coverage and adequate vessel wall apposition was obtained in all 19 cases.ConclusionsSurpass is a next-generation flow diverter with unique device-specific and delivery-specific features compared with clinically available endoluminal flow diverters. Our initial experience demonstrates a favorable technical profile in treatment of large and giant ICA aneurysms.Trial registration numberNCT01716117.

scholarly journals Novel use of flow diversion for the treatment of aneurysms associated with arteriovenous malformations

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. E7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Kilburg ◽  
Philipp Taussky ◽  
M. Yashar S. Kalani ◽  
Min S. Park
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformations ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Cerebral Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Complete Occlusion ◽  
Martin Grade ◽  
Flow Diverting Stent

The use of flow-diverting stents for intracranial aneurysms has become more prevalent, and flow diverters are now routinely used beyond their initial scope of approval at the proximal internal carotid artery. Although flow diversion for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms is becoming more commonplace, there have been no reports of its use to treat flow-related cerebral aneurysms associated with arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). The authors report the cases of 2 patients whose AVM-associated aneurysms were managed with flow diversion. A 40-year-old woman presented with a history of headaches that led to the identification of an unruptured Spetzler-Martin Grade V, right parietooccipital AVM associated with 3 aneurysms of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery. Initial attempts at balloon-assisted coil embolization of the aneurysms were unsuccessful. The patient underwent placement of a flow-diverting stent across the diseased vessel; a 6-month follow-up angiogram demonstrated complete occlusion of the aneurysms. In the second case, a 57-year-old man presented with new-onset seizures, and an unruptured Spetzler-Martin Grade V, right frontal AVM associated with an irregular, wide-necked anterior communicating artery aneurysm was identified. The patient underwent placement of a flow-diverting stent, and complete occlusion of the aneurysm was observed on a 7-month follow-up angiogram. These 2 cases illustrate the potential for use of flow diversion as a treatment strategy for feeding artery aneurysms associated with AVMs. Because of the need for dual antiplatelet medications after flow diversion in this patient population, however, this strategy should be used judiciously.

Multimodality Treatment of Complex Unruptured Cavernous and Paraclinoid Aneurysms

Neurosurgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis J. Kim ◽  
Farzana Tariq ◽  
Michael Levitt ◽  
Jason Barber ◽  
Basavaraj Ghodke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Paraclinoid Aneurysms ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhages ◽  
Endovascular Device ◽  
Group 1

Abstract BACKGROUND: Unruptured aneurysms of the cavernous and paraclinoid internal carotid artery can be approached via microsurgical and endovascular approaches. Trends in treatment reflect a steady shift toward endovascular techniques. OBJECTIVE: To analyze our results with multimodal treatment. METHODS: We reviewed patients with unruptured cavernous and paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms proximal to the posterior communicating artery treated at a single center from 2007 to 2012. Treatment included 4 groups: (1) stent-assisted coiling, (2) pipeline endovascular device (PED) flow diverter, (3) clipping, and (4) trapping/bypass. Follow-up was 2 to 60 months. RESULTS: The 109 aneurysms in 102 patients were studied with the following treatment groupings: 41 were done with stent-assisted coiling, 24 with Pipeline endovascular device, 24 by microsurgical clipping, and 20 by trap/bypass. Group: (1) two percent had delayed significant intraparenchymal hemorrhage; (2) thirteen percent had central nerve palsies, 8% had small asymptomatic infarcts, and 4% had small, asymptomatic remote-site hemorrhages; (3) twenty-nine percent of patients suffered from transient central nerve palsies, 4% experienced major stroke, and 8% had small intracerebral hemorrhages; (4) thirty-five percent had transient central nerve palsies, 10% had strokes, and 10% had intracerebral hemorrhages. In terms of follow-up obliteration, 83% had complete/nearly complete obliteration at last follow-up, 17% had residual aneurysms, and 10% required retreatment. Ninety-six percent of group 1 (35/38), 100% of group 2 (23/23), 100% of group 3 (21/21), and 95% of group 4 had modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 1. CONCLUSION: Treatment of these aneurysms can be carried out with acceptable rates of morbidity. Careful patient selection is crucial for optimal outcome. Endovascular treatment volumes likely will continue to predominate over microsurgical techniques as changing skill sets evolve in neurosurgery, but individualized application of all available treatment options will continue.

scholarly journals The Medina Embolic Device: early clinical experience from a single center

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Aguilar Perez ◽  
Pervinder Bhogal ◽  
Rosa Martinez Moreno ◽  
Hansjörg Bäzner ◽  
Oliver Ganslandt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Anterior Communicating Artery ◽  
Major Step ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
True Value ◽  
Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diverters

ObjectiveTo report our initial experience with the Medina Embolic Device (MED) in unruptured intracranial aneurysms either as sole treatment or in conjunction with additional devices.Methods15 consecutive patients (6 women, 9 men) with unruptured aneurysms were treated between September 2015 and April 2016. The aneurysm fundus measured at least 5 mm. We evaluated the angiographic appearances of treated aneurysms at the end of the procedure and at follow-up, the clinical status, complications, and requirement for adjunctive devices.ResultsThe MED was successfully deployed in all but one case and adjunctive devices were required in 10 cases. Aneurysm locations were middle cerebral artery bifurcation (n=3), internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation (n=1), supraclinoid ICA (n=5), posterior communicating artery (n=1), anterior communicating artery (n=2), cavernous ICA (n=2), distal basilar sidewall (n=1), basilar tip (n=1). Three patients had complications although none could be attributed to the MED. Immediate angiographic results were modified Raymond-Roy classification (mRRC) I=1, mRRC II=5, mRRC IIIa=3, mRRC IIIb=5, and one patient showed contrast stasis within the fundus of the aneurysm. Follow-up angiography was available in 11 patients, with four showing complete aneurysm exclusion, six with stable remnants and one patient with an enlarging neck remnant.ConclusionsThe MED represents a major step forward in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. It can result in rapid exclusion of an aneurysm from the circulation and has a good safety profile. We believe that the true value of the MED will be in combining its use with adjunctive devices such as endoluminal flow diverters that will result in rapid aneurysmal exclusion.

Treatment of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms in the Internal Carotid Artery With Flow Diverters

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S55-S63
Author(s):  
Kunal Vakharia ◽  
Stephan A Munich ◽  
Muhammad Waqas ◽  
Elad I Levy ◽  
Adnan H Siddiqui
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Flow Diverter ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Technological Advances ◽  
Posterior Circulation Aneurysms ◽  
Surgical Options ◽  
Flow Diverters

Abstract Several studies have shown the efficacy and feasibility of flow diversion for the endovascular treatment of wide-necked and otherwise anatomically challenging intracranial aneurysms (IA). Technological advances have led to successful long-term occlusion rates and a safety profile for flow-diverter stents that parallels other endovascular and open surgical options for these lesions. With growing indications for use of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED, Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland) to include IAs up to the internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus, understanding the nuances of this technology is increasingly relevant. Furthermore, there is a growing body of literature on the use of flow diversion to treat distal (up to A2, M2, and P2), ruptured, and posterior circulation aneurysms, although these applications are “off-label” at present. In this manuscript, we discuss the expanding role of flow diversion in the ICA and compare this technique with other endovascular options for the treatment of ICA IAs. We also discuss technical nuances of the deployment of flow diverters for the treatment of challenging lesions and in difficult and tortuous anatomy.

Treatment of blood blister aneurysms of the internal carotid artery with flow diversion

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1074-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxim Mokin ◽  
Angel Chinea ◽  
Christopher T Primiani ◽  
Zeguang Ren ◽  
Peter Kan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid Artery ◽  
Internal Carotid ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Therapeutic Modality ◽  
Good Clinical Outcome ◽  
Complete Obliteration ◽  
Delayed Complications

BackgroundBlood blister aneurysms (BBA) are a rare subset of intracranial aneurysms that represent a therapeutic challenge from both a surgical and endovascular perspective.ObjectiveTo report multicenter experience with flow diversion exclusively for BBA, located at non-branching segments along the anteromedial wall of the supraclinoidal internal carotid artery (ICA).MethodsConsecutive cases of BBA located at non-branching segments along the anteromedial wall of the supraclinoidal ICA treated with flow diversion were included in the final analysis.Results49 patients with 51 BBA of the ICA treated with devices to achieve the flow diversion effect were identified. 43 patients with 45 BBA of the ICA were treated with the pipeline embolization device and were included in the final analysis. Angiographic follow-up data were available for 30 patients (32 aneurysms in total); 87.5% of aneurysms (28/32) showed complete obliteration, 9.4% (3/32) showed reduced filling, and 3.1% (1/32) persistent filling. There was no difference between the size of aneurysm (≤2 mm vs >2 mm) or the use of adjunct coiling and complete occlusion of the aneurysm on follow-up (P=0.354 and P=0.865, respectively). Clinical follow-up data were available for 38 of 43 patients. 68% of patients (26/38) had a good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 0–2) at 3 months. There were 7 (16%) immediate procedural and 2 (5%) delayed complications, with 1 case of fatal delayed re-rupture after the initial treatment.ConclusionsOur data support the use of a flow diversion technique as a safe and effective therapeutic modality for BBA of the supraclinoid ICA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document