Misleading signs in acute vertigo

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Lance ◽  
Stuart Scott Mossman

The acute vestibular syndrome is common and usually has a benign cause. Sometimes, however, even experienced neurologists can find it difficult to determine the cause clinically. Furthermore, neuroimaging is known to be insensitive.We describe two cases of acute vestibular syndrome where conflicting clinical findings contributed to a delay in making the correct diagnosis. The first patient with symptomatic vertigo had signs consistent with horizontal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo but also had an abnormal horizontal head impulse test, superficially suggesting acute vestibular neuritis but later accounted for by the finding of a vestibular schwannoma (acoustic neuroma). The second patient also had an abnormal horizontal head impulse test, with skew deviation suggesting stroke as the cause. However, later assessment identified that a long-standing fourth nerve palsy was the true cause for her apparent skew. We discuss potential errors that can arise when assessing such patients and highlight ways to avoid them.

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
Luigi Califano ◽  
Raffaella Iannella ◽  
Salvatore Mazzone ◽  
Francesca Salafia ◽  
Maria Grazia Melillo

Author(s):  
ERCAN KARABABA ◽  
Hacı Hüseyin DERE ◽  
Banu MÜJDECİ ◽  
Erkan KARATAŞ

Purpose: Vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) may be helpful in the diagnosis of Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo (BPPV). Video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) can effectively diagnose VOR deficits in vestibular disorders. Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the significance of vHIT in determining the efficacy of therapeutic maneuvers in individuals with posterior semicircular canal BPPV. Materials and Methods: The study included 25 patients with posterior SCC BPPV (Study Group) between the ages of 19-65 years, 30 healthy individuals (Control Group). All individuals underwent otorhinolaryngologic examination, audiological evaluation with, videonystagmography and vHIT. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were administered to the individuals with posterior SCC BPPV for the intensity of dizziness and Modified Epley maneuver was performed 3 times at an interval of 3 days. The vHIT, DHI and VAS were re-administered to these individuals 1 week after improvement was detected in positional nystagmus. Results: There was no significant difference between the study and control groups in terms of vHIT gains for all bilateral SCCs before therapeutic maneuver (p>0.05). In the study group, there was no significant difference between vHIT gains of all bilateral SSCs before and after therapeutic maneuvers (p>0.05). No asymmetry or refixation saccades (overt and covert) were observed in any of the individuals in both groups during all measurements. Compared to before therapeutic maneuvers, there was a significant decrease in dizziness-related disability level assessed by DHI and intensity of dizziness assessed by VAS in the study group after the improvement (p<0.001). Conclusion: It was found that vHIT was not a diagnostic test in BPPV and in terms of evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic maneuvers. Subjective evaluations determining the intensity of dizziness and level of dizziness-related disability in BPPV provided supportive information in diagnosis and in determining the efficacy of therapeutic maneuvers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document