scholarly journals Principles for Best Practice in Clinical Audit: National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Abingdon, Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press, 2002. pound29.95 (pound19.95 for NHS staff). 208 pp. ISBN 1 85775 976 1

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
K M J Walshe
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 205031211983873
Author(s):  
Kyriakos Souliotis ◽  
Christina Golna ◽  
Vasiliki Mantzana ◽  
Sotirios Papaspyropoulos ◽  
Anastasios Koutsovasilis ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: Clinical audit is applied to optimize clinical practice and quality of healthcare services while controlling for money spent, critically in resource-deprived settings. This case study reports on the outcomes of a retrospective clinical audit on private hospitalizations, for which reimbursement had been pending by the Health Care Organization for Public Servants (OPAD) in Greece. This case study is the first effort by a social insurance organization in Greece to employ external clinical audit before settling contracted private healthcare charges. Methods: One thousand two hundred hospitalization records were reviewed retrospectively and a fully anonymized clinical audit summary report created for each one of them by a team of clinical audit experts, proposing evidence-based cuts in pending charges where medical services were deemed clinically unnecessary. These audit reports were then collated and analysed to test trends in overcharges among hospitalized insureds per reason for hospitalization. Results: The clinical audit report concluded that 17.4% of a total reimbursement claim of €12,387,702.18 should not be reimbursed, as it corresponded to unnecessary or not fully justifiable according to evidence-based, best practice, medical service provision. The majority of proposed cuts were related to charges for medical devices, which are borne directly by social insurance with no patient or private insurance co-payment. Conclusion: Clinical audit of hospital practice may be a key tool to optimize care provision, address supplier-induced demand and effectively manage costs for national health insurance, especially in circumstances of budgetary constraints, such as in austerity-stricken settings or developing national healthcare systems.


2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 716-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clodoaldo Tentes Côrtes ◽  
Rafael Cleison Silva dos Santos ◽  
Adriana de Souza Caroci ◽  
Sheyla Guimarães Oliveira ◽  
Sonia Maria Junqueira Vasconcelos de Oliveira ◽  
...  

AbstractOBJECTIVEPresenting methodology for transferring knowledge to improve maternal outcomes in natural delivery based on scientific evidence.METHOD: An intervention study conducted in the maternity hospital of Itapecerica da Serra, SP, with 50 puerperal women and 102 medical records from July to November 2014. The PACES tool from Joanna Briggs Institute, consisting of pre-clinical audit (phase 1), implementation of best practice (phase 2) and Follow-up Clinical Audit (phase 3) was used. Data were analyzed by comparing results of phases 1 and 3 with Fisher's exact test and a significance level of 5%.RESULTSThe vertical position was adopted by the majority of puerperal women with statistical difference between phases 1 and 3. A significant increase in bathing/showering, walking and massages for pain relief was found from the medical records. No statistical difference was found in other practices and outcomes. Barriers and difficulties in the implementation of evidence-based practices have been identified. Variables were refined, techniques and data collection instruments were verified, and an intervention proposal was made.CONCLUSIONThe study found possibilities for implementing a methodology of practices based on scientific evidence for assistance in natural delivery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley Viner

<p>Embracing EBVM as a concept is an important first step, but is of little value unless it is translated into an improvement in patient care. This session will discuss how EBVM can be incorporated into clinical guidelines at a practice level, using a team-based approach to maximise concordance. The pros and cons of using practice guidelines as a means of improving clinical effectiveness will be discussed, followed by an illustration of how the clinical audit cycle can be used as a tool to ensure that Best Practice as a established by practice guidelines is applied to produce an improvement in clinical performance.</p><p> <a href="/index.php/ve/article/view/95/128"><img src="/public/site/images/bridget/Bradley_twitte_image.PNG" alt="" /></a></p><br /> <img src="https://www.veterinaryevidence.org/rcvskmod/icons/oa-icon.jpg" alt="Open Access" />


Author(s):  
Laleh Rej ◽  
Sebastian Doeltgen ◽  
Amy Rodriguez ◽  
Willem van Steenbrugge

Purpose: To investigate service delivery of aphasia rehabilitation in a metropolitan rehabilitation hospital by speech pathologists and assess adherence to both the National Stroke Foundation (NSF) Clinical Guidelines and the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre (AROC) database of benchmarks. Method: A retrospective audit of 34 discharged patients was conducted within a dedicated stroke rehabilitation unit from March 2012 to July 2013 in Australia. Discharge reports, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores and clinical time statistics derived from the organization’s electronic database were studied and compared with NSF’s Clinical Guidelines for best practice recommendations and AROC benchmarks. Results: Patients with aphasia were admitted to inpatient rehabilitation at an average of 21 days post stroke, 2 days beyond the AROC benchmark for inpatient rehabilitation. The mean length of stay of patients with aphasia was 60 days, significantly longer than the average AROC benchmark of 32.8 days. Patients received an average of 4.25 hours of speech pathology therapy per week, more than twice the minimum amount of therapy time recommended by the NSF Guidelines. Conclusion: The current clinical audit is the first known speech pathology audit investigating adherence to stroke and aphasia rehabilitation guidelines set forth by the NSF clinical guidelines and AROC benchmarks in Australia. By comparing current care with advocated best practice, strengths were identified in service delivery, as well as priority areas for quality improvement.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Burgess ◽  
John Moorhead
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 153 (5) ◽  
pp. 174-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sándor Gődény

The first two articles in the series were about the definition of quality in healthcare, the quality approach, the importance of quality assurance, the advantages of quality management systems and the basic concepts and necessity of evidence based medicine. In the third article the importance and basic steps of clinical audit are summarised. Clinical audit is an integral part of quality assurance and quality improvement in healthcare, that is the responsibility of any practitioner involved in medical practice. Clinical audit principally measures the clinical practice against clinical guidelines, protocols and other professional standards, and sometimes induces changes to ensure that all patients receive care according to principles of the best practice. The clinical audit can be defined also as a quality improvement process that seeks to identify areas for service improvement, develop and carry out plans and actions to improve medical activity and then by re-audit to ensure that these changes have an effect. Therefore, its aims are both to stimulate quality improvement interventions and to assess their impact in order to develop clinical effectiveness. At the end of the article key points of quality assurance and improvement in medical practice are summarised. Orv. Hetil., 2012, 153, 174–183.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document