scholarly journals Quality indicators for primary care mental health services

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Shield
2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 1137-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicki Johnson-Lawrence ◽  
Kara Zivin ◽  
Benjamin R. Szymanski ◽  
Paul N. Pfeiffer ◽  
John F. McCarthy

2007 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Neufeld ◽  
Peter M. Yellowlees ◽  
Donald M. Hilty ◽  
Hattie Cobb ◽  
James A. Bourgeois

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 685-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah McCue Horwitz ◽  
Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood ◽  
Andrew Garner ◽  
Michael Macknin ◽  
Thomas Phelps ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. D. Jordans ◽  
E. C. Garman ◽  
N. P. Luitel ◽  
B. A. Kohrt ◽  
C. Lund ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Integration of mental health services into primary healthcare is proliferating in low-resource countries. We aimed to evaluate the impact of different compositions of primary care mental health services for depression and alcohol use disorder (AUD), when compared to usual primary care services. Methods We conducted a non-randomized controlled study in rural Nepal. We compared treatment outcomes among patients screening positive and receiving: (a) primary care mental health services without a psychological treatment component (TG); (b) the same services including a psychological treatment (TG + P); and (c) primary care treatment as usual (TAU). Primary outcomes included change in depression and AUD symptoms, as well as disability. Disability was measured using the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule. Symptom severity was assessed using the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire for depression, the 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test for AUD. We used negative binomial regression models for the analysis. Results For depression, when combining both treatment groups (TG, n = 77 and TG + P, n = 60) compared to TAU (n = 72), there were no significant improvements. When only comparing the psychological treatment group (TG + P) with TAU, there were significant improvements for symptoms and disability (aβ = − 2.64; 95%CI − 4.55 to − 0.74, p = 0.007; aβ = − 12.20; 95%CI − 19.79 to − 4.62; p = 0.002, respectively). For AUD, when combining both treatment groups (TG, n = 92 and TG + P, n = 80) compared to TAU (n = 57), there were significant improvements in AUD symptoms and disability (aβ = − 15.13; 95%CI − 18.63 to − 11.63, p < 0.001; aβ = − 9.26; 95%CI − 16.41 to − 2.12, p = 0.011; respectively). For AUD, there were no differences between TG and TG + P. Patients’ perceptions of health workers’ skills in common psychological factors were associated with improvement in depression patient outcomes (β = − 0.36; 95%CI − 0.55 to − 0.18; p < 0.001) but not for AUD patients. Conclusion Primary care mental health services for depression may only be effective when psychological treatments are included. Health workers’ competencies as perceived by patients may be an important indicator for treatment effect. AUD treatment in primary care appears to be beneficial even without additional psychological services.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
Karla Mendoza ◽  
Arianna Ulloa ◽  
Nayelhi Saavedra ◽  
Jorge Galván ◽  
Shoshana Berenzon

Objective: To analyze factors associated with and predicting Mexican women seeking primary care mental health services (PCMHS) and provide suggestions to increase PCMHS utilization. Method: We administered a questionnaire to (N = 456) female patients in Mexico City primary care clinics. We conducted chi-square analyses of seeking PCMHS and sociodemographic variables, perceptions of and experiences with PCMHS. Our results and literature review guided our logistic regression model. Results: Women referred to a mental health provider (MHP; odds ratio [OR] = 10.81, 95% CI = 3.59-32.51), whose coping mechanisms included talking to a MHP (OR = 5.53, 95% CI = 2.10-14.53), whose primary worry is loneliness (OR = 8.15, 95% CI = 1.20-55.10), and those who follow doctor’s orders; were more likely to seek PCMHS (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09-0.92). Conclusions: Primary care providers play a fundamental role in women’s decisions to seek PCMHS. Proper referrals to PCMHS should be encouraged.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document