scholarly journals Mandibular advancement oral appliance therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea: effect on awake calibre of the velopharynx

Thorax ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 972-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
C F Ryan ◽  
L L Love ◽  
D Peat ◽  
J A Fleetham ◽  
A A Lowe
2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-214
Author(s):  
Masafumi Furuhashi ◽  
Takayuki Ohno ◽  
Mutsuya Nomura ◽  
Atsushi Shinohara ◽  
Yoshiaki Kazaoka ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Ngiam ◽  
R Balasubramaniam ◽  
MA Darendeliler ◽  
AT Cheng ◽  
K Waters ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 1410-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Okuno ◽  
Yasuhiro Sasao ◽  
Kanji Nohara ◽  
Takayoshi Sakai ◽  
Benjamin T. Pliska ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to determine the utility of nasoendoscopy of the upper airway as a predictor of the efficacy of oral appliance treatment in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA).A total of 61 consecutive patients with moderate-to-severe polysomnographically diagnosed OSA were recruited for this study. Using nasoendoscopy, we prospectively assessed the velopharynx and oro/hypopharynx in each patient while awake and in the supine position. We measured cross-sectional area (CSA), and anteroposterior and lateral diameters of the airway before and after mandibular advancement, and expressed the changes in dimensions as expansion ratios (after/before). We then compared the measurements of responders and nonresponders with oral appliance treatment.The expansion ratio (median (interquartile range)) for the CSA was greater in responders compared with nonresponders in the velopharynx (2.9 (2.3–5.0)versus1.7 (1.5–1.9), p<0.001) and in the oro/hypopharynx (3.4 (2.5–5.6)versus2.4 (1.8–3.7), p<0.05). Baseline apnoea–hypopnoea index and the CSA expansion ratio of the velopharynx were independent predictors of oral appliance treatment outcome based on a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The estimated area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.87 and the cut-off value of the expansion ratio was 2.00.These results indicate that nasoendoscopy may have significant clinical utility in predicting the success of oral appliance treatment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (153) ◽  
pp. 190083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Marklund ◽  
Marc J.A. Braem ◽  
Johan Verbraecken

Oral appliances are increasingly recommended for selected patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and those who do not tolerate nor prefer continuous positive airway pressure. The most commonly used oral appliance advances the lower jaw during sleep, the so-called mandibular advancement device (MAD). Patients seek treatment because of disturbing snoring, daytime symptoms, apnoeas that disturb sleep and the longer term consequences with regard to cardiovascular risks. MADs reduce the apnoea–hypopnoea index, although to various degrees among patients. Effects on daytime sleepiness have been observed mainly among the more severe OSA patients. Blood pressure may be reduced in MAD-treated OSA patients. There is, however, uncertainty about which patients will respond to this therapy in terms of apnoea reductions, decreased sleepiness and other symptoms, and reduced risk for future impaired health. The occurrence of side-effects also remains difficult to predict at present. The majority of sleep apnoea patients suffer from various comorbidities in terms of cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes and depression. The most recent findings indicate that phenotyping of patients, considering various aspects of this multifaceted disease, will shed more light on the indications for MADs in patients with nightly sleep breathing disturbances. This review summarises the most recent knowledge about MAD treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document