High-Speed Reaction Zone Structure for Variable Mole Chemistry

1991 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1090-1118
Author(s):  
Kadir Kirkköprü ◽  
David R. Kassoy
2000 ◽  
Vol 421 ◽  
pp. 147-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHRIS A. ECKETT ◽  
JAMES J. QUIRK ◽  
JOSEPH E. SHEPHERD

An analytical model is presented for the direct initiation of gaseous detonations by a blast wave. For stable or weakly unstable mixtures, numerical simulations of the spherical direct initiation event and local analysis of the one-dimensional unsteady reaction zone structure identify a competition between heat release, wave front curvature and unsteadiness. The primary failure mechanism is found to be unsteadiness in the induction zone arising from the deceleration of the wave front. The quasi-steady assumption is thus shown to be incorrect for direct initiation. The numerical simulations also suggest a non-uniqueness of critical energy in some cases, and the model developed here is an attempt to explain the lower critical energy only. A critical shock decay rate is determined in terms of the other fundamental dynamic parameters of the detonation wave, and hence this model is referred to as the critical decay rate (CDR) model. The local analysis is validated by integration of reaction-zone structure equations with real gas kinetics and prescribed unsteadiness. The CDR model is then applied to the global initiation problem to produce an analytical equation for the critical energy. Unlike previous phenomenological models of the critical energy, this equation is not dependent on other experimentally determined parameters and for evaluation requires only an appropriate reaction mechanism for the given gas mixture. For different fuel–oxidizer mixtures, it is found to give agreement with experimental data to within an order of magnitude.


2000 ◽  
Vol 122 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Donbar ◽  
James F. Driscoll ◽  
Campbell D. Carter

2007 ◽  
Vol 179 (4) ◽  
pp. 723-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUNICHI FURUKAWA ◽  
HIDEKI HASHIMOTO ◽  
SUSUMU MOCHIDA ◽  
TOSHIAKI HASEGAWA

Author(s):  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Pengfei Zou ◽  
Bosen Wang ◽  
Xin Xue ◽  
Yuzhen Lin ◽  
...  

An experimental investigation was conducted to characterize the flame structures and dynamics at stable and near-lean blowout (LBO) conditions. The current experiments were carried out using a laboratory-scale aero-combustor with an internally-staged dome. The internally-staged injector consisted of pilot and main swirlers, and the pilot swirler was fueled with Chinese kerosene RP-3 while the main injector was chocked. The resulting spray flame was confined within a quartz tube under atmosphere pressure. In the present study, the influence of swirl intensity of the pilot swirler was also investiagted. The OH* chemiluminescence of the flame was recorded by a high-speed camera at a frequency of 2000 Hz. From the high-speed OH* images, the reaction zone was marked and the fluctuation of the reaction zone along axial direction was observed, showing that it became stronger at near-LBO condition than at stable condition. Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) analysis was further used to provide insights into the characteristics of flame dynamics. Based on the POD results, the difference of the flame dynamics between the stable and near-LBO combustion was distinct. While the major Mode l of the flame under stable condition was rotation representing the rotation motion in the swirl flame, at near-LBO condition the flame dynamics included three modes — vibration, rotation, and flame shedding. In addition, for swirl-stabilized kerosene spray combustion investigated herein, the fluctuation of the reaction zone in axial direction became stronger with decreasing equivalence ratio when approaching LBO, and the POD analysis indicated that the Mode l of flame dynamics transitions from the rotation mode to the vibration mode. Although the change of pilot swirl number was found to have little influence on the Mode l of flame dynamics, it was noted to vary the fluctuation energy of the flame.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yushi Liu ◽  
Wenwu Chen ◽  
Jinglong Wang ◽  
Xiaobo Xu ◽  
Zhendong Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document