Using management strategy evaluation to establish indicators of changing fisheries

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 1653-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.R. Carruthers ◽  
A.R. Hordyk

A new indicator is described that uses multivariate posterior predictive data arising from management strategy evaluation (MSE) to detect operating model misspecification (exceptional circumstances) due to changing system dynamics. The statistical power of the indicator was calculated for five case studies for which fishery stock assessments have estimated changes in recruitment, natural mortality rate, growth, fishing efficiency, and size selectivity. The importance of the component data types that inform the indicator was also calculated. The indicator was tested for multiple types of management procedures (e.g., catch limits by stock assessment, size limits, spatial closures) given varying qualities of data. The statistical power of the indicator could be high even over short time periods and depended on the type of system change and quality of data. Statistical power depended strongly on the type of management approach, suggesting that indicators should be established that rigorously account for feedbacks between proposed management and observed data. MSE processes should use alternative operating models to evaluate protocols for exceptional circumstances to ensure they are of acceptable statistical power.

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 567-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas S. Butterworth ◽  
Nokome Bentley ◽  
José A. A. De Oliveira ◽  
Gregory P. Donovan ◽  
Laurence T. Kell ◽  
...  

Abstract Butterworth, D. S., Bentley, N., De Oliveira, J. A. A., Donovan, G. P., Kell, L. T., Parma, A. M., Punt, A. E., Sainsbury, K. J., Smith, A. D. M., and Stokes, T. K. 2010. Purported flaws in management strategy evaluation: basic problems or misinterpretations? – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67: 567–574. Rochet and Rice, while recognizing management strategy evaluation (MSE) as an important step forward in fisheries management, level a number of criticisms at its implementation. Some of their points are sound, such as the need for care in representing uncertainties and for thorough documentation of the process. However, others evidence important misunderstandings. Although the difficulties in estimating tail probabilities and risks, as discussed by Rochet and Rice, are well known, their arguments that Efron's non-parametric bootstrap re-sampling method underestimates the probabilities of low values are flawed. In any case, though, the focus of MSEs is primarily on comparing performance and robustness across alternative management procedures (MPs), rather than on estimating absolute levels of risk. Qualitative methods can augment MSE, but their limitations also need to be recognized. Intelligence certainly needs to play a role in fisheries management, but not at the level of tinkering in the provision of annual advice, which Rochet and Rice apparently advocate, inter alia because this runs the risk of advice following noise rather than signal. Instead, intelligence should come into play in the exercise of oversight through the process of multiannual reviews of MSE and associated MPs. A number of examples are given of the process of interaction with stakeholders which should characterize MSE.


2001 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 719 ◽  
Author(s):  
André E. Punt ◽  
Anthony D. M. Smith ◽  
Gurong Cui

The MSE approach provides a simulation-based framework within which harvest strategies, stock assessment methods, performance indicators and research programmes can be compared. This approach has been used in the Australian South East Fishery (SEF) to assess harvest strategies for the over-exploited eastern gemfish resource and to compare different levels of discard monitoring for blue grenadier. The main challenges to use of the MSE approach in the SEF are poorly specified management objectives and the lack of quantitative stock assessments on which to build operating models for many of the species.


2015 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Wiedenmann ◽  
Michael J. Wilberg ◽  
Andrea Sylvia ◽  
Thomas J. Miller

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. 643-656 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shana K. Miller ◽  
Alejandro Anganuzzi ◽  
Doug S. Butterworth ◽  
Campbell R. Davies ◽  
Greg P. Donovan ◽  
...  

The use of management strategy evaluation (MSE) to design and test candidate fisheries management approaches is expanding globally. Participation of managers, scientists, and stakeholders should be an integral component of the MSE process. Open and effective communication among these groups is essential for the success of the MSE and the adoption of the management approach based on it. The highly technical nature of MSE and newness of the approach to many audiences present considerable communication challenges and have, unfortunately, slowed progress in some cases. We draw on diverse experiences with MSE to identify two areas in which the implementation of MSE in multinational fora may be improved: (i) the use of formally constituted “intermediary groups” as a forum for exchange at the management–science interface and (ii) the development of engaging, yet uncomplicated, visual communication tools for conveying key results to different audiences at each stage. While our focus is the MSE processes underway in the regional fisheries management organizations for tunas and tuna-like species, the advice provided is also pertinent for other fisheries, international and domestic alike, pursuing MSE.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret C. Siple ◽  
Laura E. Koehn ◽  
Kelli F. Johnson ◽  
André E. Punt ◽  
T. Mariella Canales ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorleta Garcia ◽  
Agurtzane Urtizberea ◽  
Guzman Diez ◽  
Juan Gil ◽  
Paul Marchal

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document