Review of progress in the introduction of management strategy evaluation (MSE) approaches in Australia's South East Fishery

2001 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 719 ◽  
Author(s):  
André E. Punt ◽  
Anthony D. M. Smith ◽  
Gurong Cui

The MSE approach provides a simulation-based framework within which harvest strategies, stock assessment methods, performance indicators and research programmes can be compared. This approach has been used in the Australian South East Fishery (SEF) to assess harvest strategies for the over-exploited eastern gemfish resource and to compare different levels of discard monitoring for blue grenadier. The main challenges to use of the MSE approach in the SEF are poorly specified management objectives and the lack of quantitative stock assessments on which to build operating models for many of the species.

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (9) ◽  
pp. 1653-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.R. Carruthers ◽  
A.R. Hordyk

A new indicator is described that uses multivariate posterior predictive data arising from management strategy evaluation (MSE) to detect operating model misspecification (exceptional circumstances) due to changing system dynamics. The statistical power of the indicator was calculated for five case studies for which fishery stock assessments have estimated changes in recruitment, natural mortality rate, growth, fishing efficiency, and size selectivity. The importance of the component data types that inform the indicator was also calculated. The indicator was tested for multiple types of management procedures (e.g., catch limits by stock assessment, size limits, spatial closures) given varying qualities of data. The statistical power of the indicator could be high even over short time periods and depended on the type of system change and quality of data. Statistical power depended strongly on the type of management approach, suggesting that indicators should be established that rigorously account for feedbacks between proposed management and observed data. MSE processes should use alternative operating models to evaluate protocols for exceptional circumstances to ensure they are of acceptable statistical power.


2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 754-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Joëlle Rochet ◽  
Jake C. Rice

Abstract Rochet, M-J. and Rice, J. C. 2009. Simulation-based management strategy evaluation: ignorance disguised as mathematics? – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 754–762. Simulation-based management strategy evaluations are increasingly developed and used for science advice in support of fisheries management, along with risk evaluation and decision analysis. These methods tackle the problem of uncertainty in fisheries systems and data by modelling uncertainty in two ways. For quantities that are difficult to measure accurately or are inherently variable, variables are replaced by probability distributions, and system dynamics are simulated by Monte Carlo simulations, drawing numbers from these distributions. For processes that are not fully understood, arrays of model formulations that might underlie the observed patterns are developed, each is assumed successively, and the results of the corresponding arrays of model results are then combined. We argue that these approaches have several paradoxical features. Stochastic modelling of uncertainty is paradoxical, because it implies knowing more than deterministic approaches: to know the distribution of a quantity requires more information than only estimating its expected value. To combine the results of Monte Carlo simulations with different model formulations may be paradoxical if outcomes of concern are unlikely under some formulations but very likely under others, whereas the reported uncertainty from combined results may produce a risk level that does not occur under any plausible assumed formulation. Moreover, risk estimates of the probability of undesirable outcomes are often statements about likelihood of events that were seldom observed and lie in the tails of the simulated distributions, where the results of Monte Carlo simulation are the least reliable. These potential paradoxes lead us to suggest that greater attention be given to alternative methods to evaluate risks or management strategies, such as qualitative methods and empirical post hoc analyses.


2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 575-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Joëlle Rochet ◽  
Jake C. Rice

Abstract Rochet, M-J., and Rice, J. C. 2010. Comment on “Purported flaws in management strategy evaluation: basic problems or misinterpretation?” by Butterworth et al. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 67: 575–576. Simulation-based management strategy evaluation is a valuable tool, when appropriately implemented. Implementation, however, may not always have been appropriate, and some reasons are provided why perhaps there is incomplete faith in certain of its technical aspects, such as knowing the distribution of the parameters of population processes from the information in limited datasets. A management strategy that has been evaluated by simulation should not be used as an “autopilot”, because even the most competent of experts can develop autopilots with imperfect and incomplete knowledge of reality, and all information should be incorporated when decisions have to be made.


2015 ◽  
Vol 172 ◽  
pp. 325-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Wiedenmann ◽  
Michael J. Wilberg ◽  
Andrea Sylvia ◽  
Thomas J. Miller

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret C. Siple ◽  
Laura E. Koehn ◽  
Kelli F. Johnson ◽  
André E. Punt ◽  
T. Mariella Canales ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 365-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorleta Garcia ◽  
Agurtzane Urtizberea ◽  
Guzman Diez ◽  
Juan Gil ◽  
Paul Marchal

2019 ◽  
Vol 217 ◽  
pp. 198-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Haltuch ◽  
E.N Brooks ◽  
J. Brodziak ◽  
J.A. Devine ◽  
K.F. Johnson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document