Productivity, resource use, and competitive interactions of Fra×inus uhdei in Hawaii uplands

2001 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 132-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrián Ares ◽  
James H. Fownes
Author(s):  
Michael J. Fogarty ◽  
Jeremy S. Collie

Competition and mutualism are important forms of biotic interaction in aquatic communities. Quantification of the population and community-level effects of these interactions has historically been less common in fisheries analyses than predation. In part, this reflects the difficulties in conducting controlled experiments for larger-bodied organisms in aquatic environments. Documenting competition entails not only identifying patterns of shared resource use but evidence that these resources are limiting. Inferences concerning competitive interactions in non-experimental settings may be possible if histories of population change for putative competitors are available and quantifiable interventions involving the addition of a species (through deliberate or inadvertent introductions) or a differential reduction in abundance of the species through harvesting is undertaken. Care must be taken to account for other changes in the environment in these uncontrolled quasi-experiments. Mutualistic interactions are widely recognized in aquatic ecosystems but far less commonly quantified than competition.


2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beren W. Robinson ◽  
David W. Pfennig

Abstract Identifying the causes of diversification is central to evolutionary biology. The ecological theory of adaptive diversification holds that the evolution of phenotypic differences between populations and species—and the formation of new species—stems from divergent natural selection, often arising from competitive interactions. Although increasing evidence suggests that phenotypic plasticity can facilitate this process, it is not generally appreciated that competitively mediated selection often also provides ideal conditions for phenotypic plasticity to evolve in the first place. Here, we discuss how competition plays at least two key roles in adaptive diversification depending on its pattern. First, heterogenous competition initially generates heterogeneity in resource use that favors adaptive plasticity in the form of “inducible competitors”. Second, once such competitively induced plasticity evolves, its capacity to rapidly generate phenotypic variation and expose phenotypes to alternate selective regimes allows populations to respond readily to selection favoring diversification, as may occur when competition generates steady diversifying selection that permanently drives the evolutionary divergence of populations that use different resources. Thus, competition plays two important roles in adaptive diversification—one well-known and the other only now emerging—mediated through its effect on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity.


2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 256-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hauggaard-Nielsen ◽  
M.K. Andersen ◽  
B. Jørnsgaard ◽  
E.S. Jensen

2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A634-A634
Author(s):  
P JHINGRAN ◽  
J RICCI ◽  
M MARKOWITZ ◽  
S GORDON ◽  
A ASGHARIAN ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document