Why is brood reduction in Florida scrub-jays higher in suburban than in wildland habitats?

2004 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 1427-1435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D Shawkey ◽  
Reed Bowman ◽  
Glen E Woolfenden

In a population of Florida scrub-jays, Aphelocoma coerulescens (Bosc, 1795), in a suburban scrub habitat, partial brood loss is much more common (averaging about 30% of nestlings from successful nests) than in a natural habitat (averaging about 5%). We hypothesized that this partial brood loss was attributable to starvation of last-hatched nestlings (i.e., brood reduction), and that large differences in partial brood loss were caused by differences in arthropod food abundance between the two sites. To test these hypotheses, we closely monitored nests in suburban scrub in 1999 and performed arthropod surveys and focal-nest observations in both habitats in 1998 and 1999. In suburban scrub, later hatched nestlings were three times more likely to die before fledging than earlier hatched nestlings, suggesting that brood reduction occurred. In both years, arthropod abundance in the suburban scrub was less than half that of the natural scrub. However, patterns of food delivery by parents were not significantly different between sites, suggesting that lower food abundance does not in itself explain higher partial brood loss in suburban habitat. Differences in the number of helpers, a greater degree of hatching asynchrony or the delivery of lower quality food throughout the nestling period may increase the probability that later hatched nestlings starve in suburban scrub.

The Condor ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan F. Masello ◽  
Petra Quillfeldt

Abstract We present the first data on the breeding biology of wild Burrowing Parrots (Cyanoliseus patagonus). We studied chick growth and breeding success at the largest colony of the species in the province of Río Negro, Patagonia, Argentina, during the 1999–2000 breeding season. A very high fledging success was observed and related to the absence of nest predation and the colonial breeding system. Safe nest sites were also thought to favor large mass recession of the nestlings before fledging. Mortality during the nestling period tended to be higher for fourth and fifth nestlings of a brood, indicating that brood reduction occurred. Burrowing Parrots in the study colony showed large variability in growth parameters between nestlings, possibly related to the hatching asynchrony observed. Allometric relationships for egg mass, clutch size, relative clutch mass, and nestling period of 29 wild psittaciform species are described and compared with the data from the Burrowing Parrots. Desarrollo de los Pichones y Éxito de Nidificación de Cyanoliseus patagonus Resumen. Presentamos aquí los primeros datos de la biología reproductiva en estado silvestre del loro Cyanoliseus patagonus. Se estudió el crecimiento de los pichones y el éxito de nidificación en la colonia más importante de la especie (provincia de Río Negro, Patagonia, Argentina) durante la temporada de cría 1999–2000. Se observó un alto éxito de emplumamiento de los pichones relacionado a la ausencia de depredación en el nido y al sistema colonial de nidificación que presenta la especie. Los sitios de nidificación seguros habrían favorecido la pronunciada pérdida de masa corporal observada en los pichones antes de abandonar el nido. La mortalidad durante el período de nidificación tendió a ser más alta para el cuarto y quinto pichón de la nidada, indicando la existencia de reducción de la camada. Los loros de la colonia estudiada mostraron gran variabilidad en los parámetros de desarrollo de los distintos pichones, estando ésto posiblemente relacionado con el nacimiento asincrónico de los pichones. Se describen también relaciones alométricas para la masa del huevo, el tamaño de la nidada, la masa relativa de la nidada y el período de permanencia en el nido de 29 psittaciformes silvestres y se comparan con los datos de C. patagonus.


2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 921-930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Hannam

Variation in environmental factors such as parasitism can have direct effects on an organism’s fitness. Because parasites draw resources directly from their hosts, they are expected to have negative effects; however, several nestling host – parasite systems show no evidence of direct effects. Absence of direct effects may be explained by compensation strategies used by parents or nestlings themselves. In this study evidence for both direct effects and compensatory strategies in a blow fly (genus Protocalliphora Hough, 1899) – Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis (L., 1758)) system were examined. Nestlings showed no direct effects of blow flies on survival and on size at fledging; however, parasitized broods were significantly anemic. There was no evidence for compensation by parents in the form of brood reduction and there was no support for compensation by nestlings via a hierarchy of tissue preservation. Nestlings did compensate for parasitism by accelerating growth at the end of the nestling period and delaying fledging.


Oikos ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trond Amundsen ◽  
Tore Slagsvold

Behaviour ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 94 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 1-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy Stamps ◽  
Anne Clark ◽  
Pat Arrowood ◽  
Barbara Kus

AbstractDespite widespread theoretical interest in genetic conflict between parents and offspring, there is little empirical evidence that it exists in nature. Theoretical models suggest two outcomes of conflict not predicted by alternate theories: (1) offspring that control the allocation of parental investment might show escalated demand behaviours (e.g., begging) and demand more resources than they could efficiently use and (2) parents might evolve behavioural counterstrategies which prevented offspring from obtaining extra resources, but which were more costly than a "laissez-faire" parental strategy allowing offspring control. These predictions were tested in budgerigars, (Melopsittacus undulatus) in large flight cages at Davis, California. Budgerigar clutches hatch extremely asynchronously, yet all nestlings grew at similar rates and fledged at similar sizes and ages. This independence of hatch order and performance seemed due primarily to the mother budgerigar's allofeeding strategy: females allofed offspring mainly on the basis of size, and only secondarily attended to begging rate. Offspring of a given age and size were treated the same by their mothers regardless of hatch order, and offspring undersized for their age were fed as if they were younger. In contrast, male budgerigars attended to offspring begging rates. Males tended to initiate feeding bouts when offspring begged, and to allofeed vigorous beggers more often. Variance in male allofeeding behaviour allowed comparisons of size-matched families in which females performed nearly all of the allofeeds to nestlings (= female-fed families) with families in which males and females both allofed nestlings (= male-aided families). The parent controlled the allocation of food in female-fed families, while offspring had greater control over food allocation in male-fed families. As was predicted by conflict theory, the female counterstrategy was effective but potentially costly: the food delivery rate of females was only half as fast as males'. Conversely, offspring control resulted in an escalation of beg rate for the same degree of need (as measured by size and growth), and male-aided offspring obtained nearly three times more regurgitations than female-fed nestlings, yet grew at comparable rates and fledged at comparable sizes and ages. Hence, offspring demanded and obtained more food than they could effectively use. Other avian parents also seem to use effective but potentially costly counterstrategies, and other avian offspring may demand more food than they require. Even if initial hatch asynchronies functioned in brood reduction, the parental strategies described here would allow parents to retain control over the timing and conditions for offspring loss.


1981 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Barrett Clark ◽  
David Sloan Wilson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document