Mobility of brown trout in south-central Wyoming streams

1994 ◽  
Vol 72 (12) ◽  
pp. 2078-2083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Young

Stream-resident brown trout (Salmo trutta) have often been considered to have small home ranges. To test this hypothesis, positions of adult brown trout in two streams were monitored from mid-June to early December 1991 and from late September 1992 to early June 1993 by using radiotelemetry. Thirty-seven of the 54 brown trout that were relocated at least once had home ranges greater than 50 m, trout larger than 340 mm moved more than did smaller brown trout, and movement of all fish tended to be greater in autumn. Different movement patterns of large and small fish imply the existence of two life-history strategies.

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin R. Hughes ◽  
Oliver E. Hooker ◽  
Travis E. Leeuwen ◽  
Alan Kettle‐White ◽  
Alastair Thorne ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1051-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Nevoux ◽  
Bengt Finstad ◽  
Jan Grimsrud Davidsen ◽  
Ross Finlay ◽  
Quentin Josset ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica R. Rodger ◽  
Hannele M. Honkanen ◽  
Caroline R. Bradley ◽  
Patrick Boylan ◽  
Paulo A. Prodöhl ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 704-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eileen Bannon ◽  
Neil H. Ringler

The time required to handle different-sized prey (crickets) was measured in an artificial stream for eight wild brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) in two size classes (mean total lengths, 186 and 214 mm). Handling times (HTs) scaled by mouth size were described by an exponential equation: HT = 1 + 0.84e2.35(ps/ms) (ps, prey size; ms, predator (mouth) size). Cost curves based on handling time/prey weight were used to predict optimal prey lengths of 22 mm for small trout and 24 mm for large trout. A second model based on J. W. J. Wankowski's empirical results predicted slightly smaller optima. Physical constraints provided estimated minimum prey lengths of 2.8 and 3.2 mm for large and small fish, respectively; maximum prey lengths were 89 and 97 mm, respectively. We compared the predicted optimal prey size with the size distribution of invertebrates in drift and brown trout stomachs sampled in a second-order stream from July to September 1982. The most abundant prey sizes in the study stream were near the minimum size that can be effectively handled by brown trout. Prey of the predicted optimum size were rare, but feeding was size selective in spite of a limited food resource. The growth rates of these stream-dwelling brown trout were slower than the brown trout in other streams in this region. This may reflect diets consisting largely of suboptimal-sized prey.


2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 498-509 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwan Quéméré ◽  
Jean-Luc Baglinière ◽  
Jean-Marc Roussel ◽  
Guillaume Evanno ◽  
Philip McGinnity ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document