Investigation into the Effects of Deformation on Proton Emission Rates via Lifetime Measurements

Exotic Nuclei ◽  
2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Taylor ◽  
D. M. Cullen ◽  
M. G. Procter ◽  
A. J. Smith ◽  
A. McFarlane ◽  
...  
Exotic Nuclei ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. TAYLOR ◽  
D. M. CULLEN ◽  
A. J. SMITH ◽  
A. MCFARLANE ◽  
V. TWIST ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Hodge ◽  
D. M. Cullen ◽  
M. J. Taylor ◽  
B. S. Nara Singh ◽  
L. S. Ferreira ◽  
...  

1963 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 2007-2025 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Barton ◽  
R. McPherson ◽  
R. E. Bell ◽  
W. R. Frisken ◽  
W. T. Link ◽  
...  

The observation of delayed proton emission is reported. Bombardment of both aluminum and silicon with 97-Mev protons leads to the emission of delayed proton energy groups from 2 to 5 Mev. They follow the beta decay of Si25 (T1/2 about 0.3 sec) to proton-unstable excited states of Al25. Delayed protons were also observed following bombardment of Mg, Na, F, N, and O. The energy groups in the delayed proton spectra are explained by assuming that, in each case, a nuclide whose (Z, N) is of the form (2k + 2, 2k − 1) is the parent nuclide, the decay chain being of the form:[Formula: see text]The observed delayed proton energies are those deduced by assuming that known levels of the intermediate nucleus emit the protons. Agreement of this kind, together with cross bombardment, threshold, and lifetime measurements, established the observation of the previously unreported Si25. With less experimental detail, delayed protons have been assigned to the decay schemes of the previously unreported Mg21, Ne17, and O13.


1968 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 529-550
Author(s):  
W KUTSCHERA ◽  
D PELTE ◽  
G SCHRIEDER

1979 ◽  
Vol 40 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-221-C1-222
Author(s):  
S. Schumann ◽  
I. A. Sellin ◽  
R. Mann ◽  
H. J. Frischkorn ◽  
D. Rosich ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Yun Lin ◽  
Matthew Romei ◽  
Luke Oltrogge ◽  
Irimpan Mathews ◽  
Steven Boxer

Green fluorescent protein (GFPs) have become indispensable imaging and optogenetic tools. Their absorption and emission properties can be optimized for specific applications. Currently, no unified framework exists to comprehensively describe these photophysical properties, namely the absorption maxima, emission maxima, Stokes shifts, vibronic progressions, extinction coefficients, Stark tuning rates, and spontaneous emission rates, especially one that includes the effects of the protein environment. In this work, we study the correlations among these properties from systematically tuned GFP environmental mutants and chromophore variants. Correlation plots reveal monotonic trends, suggesting all these properties are governed by one underlying factor dependent on the chromophore's environment. By treating the anionic GFP chromophore as a mixed-valence compound existing as a superposition of two resonance forms, we argue that this underlying factor is defined as the difference in energy between the two forms, or the driving force, which is tuned by the environment. We then introduce a Marcus-Hush model with the bond length alternation vibrational mode, treating the GFP absorption band as an intervalence charge transfer band. This model explains all the observed strong correlations among photophysical properties; related subtopics are extensively discussed in Supporting Information. Finally, we demonstrate the model's predictive power by utilizing the additivity of the driving force. The model described here elucidates the role of the protein environment in modulating photophysical properties of the chromophore, providing insights and limitations for designing new GFPs with desired phenotypes. We argue this model should also be generally applicable to both biological and non-biological polymethine dyes.<br>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document