Light front Hamiltonian for boson form of QED (1 + 1) in Pauli–Villars regularization

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (21) ◽  
pp. 1950113
Author(s):  
V. A. Franke ◽  
M. Yu. Malyshev ◽  
S. A. Paston ◽  
E. V. Prokhvatilov ◽  
M. I. Vyazovsky

Light front (LF) Hamiltonian for QED in [Formula: see text] dimensions is constructed using the boson form of this model with additional Pauli–Villars-type ultraviolet regularization. Perturbation theory, generated by this LF Hamiltonian, is proved to be equivalent to usual covariant chiral perturbation theory. The obtained LF Hamiltonian depends explicitly on chiral condensate parameters which enter in a form of some renormalization of coupling constants. The obtained results can be useful when one attempts to apply LF Hamiltonian approach for [Formula: see text]-dimensional models like QCD.

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prabal Adhikari ◽  
Jens O. Andersen

AbstractIn this paper, we consider two-flavor QCD at zero temperature and finite isospin chemical potential $$\mu _I$$ μ I using a model-independent analysis within chiral perturbation theory at next-to-leading order. We calculate the effective potential, the chiral condensate and the pion condensate in the pion-condensed phase at both zero and nonzero pionic source. We compare our finite pionic source results for the chiral condensate and the pion condensate with recent (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD results. Agreement with lattice results generally improves as one goes from leading order to next-to-leading order.


2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (21) ◽  
pp. 3204-3208 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. CHEN ◽  
C. Q. GENG ◽  
C. C. LIH

The form factors of the K+ → γ transition are studied in the light-front quark model and chiral perturbation theory of O(p6). The decay spectrum of K+ → e+νeγ, dominated by the structure dependent contribution, is illustrated in both models.


1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (08) ◽  
pp. 1509-1522 ◽  
Author(s):  
FARHAD ARDALAN ◽  
KAMRAN KAVIANI

We consider the noncommutative generalization of the chiral perturbation theory. The resultant coupling constants are severely restricted by the model and in good agreement with the data. When applied to the Skyrme model, our scheme reproduces the non-Skyrme term with the right coefficient. We comment on a similar treatment of the linear σ model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document