scholarly journals Perceptual invariance of nonlinear Focus+Context transformations

Author(s):  
Keith Lau ◽  
Ronald A. Rensink ◽  
Tamara Munzner
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 148-155
Author(s):  
Madhur Mangalam ◽  
Cristian Cuadra ◽  
Tarkeshwar Singh

Perception ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
John A Wilson ◽  
James O Robinson ◽  
David J Piggins

It is well-known that patterns of eccentric circles when slowly rotated give rise to compelling three-dimensional impressions of cones or conical holes which can ‘wobble’ as the pattern rotates. The wobble can be considered as part of the overall phenomenon of depth elicited from a rotating display, the ‘stereokinetic’ effect (SKE). This paper considers the three-dimensional appearance as being the result of the sliding of contours and thus it imitates the motion parallax found in real three-dimensional objects in motion. New variants of SK figures are used to examine these points. An analogy with computer programs is proposed which questions earlier views on the location of perceptual invariance.


Author(s):  
Anitha Pasupathy ◽  
Yasmine El-Shamayleh ◽  
Dina V. Popovkina

Humans and other primates rely on vision. Our visual system endows us with the ability to perceive, recognize, and manipulate objects, to avoid obstacles and dangers, to choose foods appropriate for consumption, to read text, and to interpret facial expressions in social interactions. To support these visual functions, the primate brain captures a high-resolution image of the world in the retina and, through a series of intricate operations in the cerebral cortex, transforms this representation into a percept that reflects the physical characteristics of objects and surfaces in the environment. To construct a reliable and informative percept, the visual system discounts the influence of extraneous factors such as illumination, occlusions, and viewing conditions. This perceptual “invariance” can be thought of as the brain’s solution to an inverse inference problem in which the physical factors that gave rise to the retinal image are estimated. While the processes of perception and recognition seem fast and effortless, it is a challenging computational problem that involves a substantial proportion of the primate brain.


1967 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. 533-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hüseyin Yilmaz

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (30) ◽  
pp. 7807-7812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Koch ◽  
Famya Baig ◽  
Qasim Zaidi

Pose estimation of objects in real scenes is critically important for biological and machine visual systems, but little is known of how humans infer 3D poses from 2D retinal images. We show unexpectedly remarkable agreement in the 3D poses different observers estimate from pictures. We further show that all observers apply the same inferential rule from all viewpoints, utilizing the geometrically derived back-transform from retinal images to actual 3D scenes. Pose estimations are altered by a fronto-parallel bias, and by image distortions that appear to tilt the ground plane. We used pictures of single sticks or pairs of joined sticks taken from different camera angles. Observers viewed these from five directions, and matched the perceived pose of each stick by rotating an arrow on a horizontal touchscreen. The projection of each 3D stick to the 2D picture, and then onto the retina, is described by an invertible trigonometric expression. The inverted expression yields the back-projection for each object pose, camera elevation, and observer viewpoint. We show that a model that uses the back-projection, modulated by just two free parameters, explains 560 pose estimates per observer. By considering changes in retinal image orientations due to position and elevation of limbs, the model also explains perceived limb poses in a complex scene of two bodies lying on the ground. The inferential rules simply explain both perceptual invariance and dramatic distortions in poses of real and pictured objects, and show the benefits of incorporating projective geometry of light into mental inferences about 3D scenes.


1997 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 561-570
Author(s):  
Louis Narens

AbstractCognitive universals are concepts that our civilization and technologically advanced extraterrestrial civilizations can easily interpret. The universality of certain mathematically and perceptually based concepts are discussed. It is argued that continuously based concepts are more fertile ground for surmising cognitive universals than discretely based ones, and in particular, one should be suspicious of the use of inductively based numerical concepts, including the totality of natural numbers. Ideas about intuitive evolutionary theory, physical and perceptual invariance, and the efficient processing of information are linked to provide a framework for searching for cognitive universals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document