Constraint Satisfaction Problems Solvable by Local Consistency Methods

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libor Barto ◽  
Marcin Kozik
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Local Consistency

scholarly journals Constraint programming viewed as rule-based programming

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 713-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
KRZYSZTOF R. APT ◽  
ERIC MONFROY
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Rule Based ◽  
Local Consistency ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Computation Process ◽  
Rule Based Approach ◽  
Rule Consistency

We study here a natural situation when constraint programming can be entirely reduced to rule-based programming. To this end we explain first how one can compute on constraint satisfaction problems using rules represented by simple first-order formulas. Then we consider constraint satisfaction problems that are based on predefined, explicitly given constraints. To solve them we first derive rules from these explicitly given constraints and limit the computation process to a repeated application of these rules, combined with labeling. We consider two types of rule here. The first type, that we call equality rules, leads to a new notion of local consistency, called rule consistency that turns out to be weaker than arc consistency for constraints of arbitrary arity (called hyper-arc consistency in Marriott & Stuckey (1998)). For Boolean constraints rule consistency coincides with the closure under the well-known propagation rules for Boolean constraints. The second type of rules, that we call membership rules, yields a rule-based characterization of arc consistency. To show feasibility of this rule-based approach to constraint programming, we show how both types of rules can be automatically generated, as CHR rules of Frühwirth (1995). This yields an implementation of this approach to programming by means of constraint logic programming. We illustrate the usefulness of this approach to constraint programming by discussing various examples, including Boolean constraints, two typical examples of many valued logics, constraints dealing with Waltz's language for describing polyhedral scenes, and Allen's qualitative approach to temporal logic.

Efficient Singleton Consistency by Combining Forward Checking and Bound Consistency

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 1460017
Author(s):  
Jinsong Guo ◽  
Hongbo Li ◽  
Zhanshan Li ◽  
Yonggang Zhang ◽  
Xianghua Jia
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Search Algorithms ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Local Consistency ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Strong Bound

Maintaining local consistencies can improve the efficiencies of the search algorithms solving constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). Comparing with arc consistency which is the most widely used local consistency, stronger local consistencies can make the search space smaller while they require higher computational cost. In this paper, we make an attempt on the compromise between the pruning ability and the computational cost. A new local consistency called singleton strong bound consistency (SSBC) and its light version, light SSBC, are proposed. The search algorithm maintaining light SSBC can outperform MAC on a considerable number of problems.

scholarly journals Using Pivot Consistency to Decompose and Solve Functional CSPs

1995 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 447-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. David
Keyword(s):  
Structural Properties ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
New Method ◽  
Functional Constraints ◽  
Local Consistency ◽  
Semantic Properties

Many studies have been carried out in order to increase thesearch efficiency of constraint satisfaction problems; among them,some make use of structural properties of the constraintnetwork; others take into account semantic properties of theconstraints, generally assuming that all the constraints possessthe given property. In this paper, we propose a new decompositionmethod benefiting from both semantic properties of functional constraints (not bijective constraints) and structuralproperties of the network; furthermore, not all the constraints needto be functional. We show that under some conditions, the existenceof solutions can be guaranteed. We first characterize a particularsubset of the variables, which we name a root set. We thenintroduce pivot consistency, a new local consistency which is aweak form of path consistency and can be achieved in O(n^2d^2)complexity (instead of O(n^3d^3) for path consistency), and wepresent associated properties; in particular, we show that anyconsistent instantiation of the root set can be linearly extended to a solution, which leads to the presentation of the aforementioned new method for solving by decomposing functional CSPs.

scholarly journals Local Consistency and SAT-Solvers

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 329-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Jeavons ◽  
J. Petke
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Inference Rule ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problem ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Fixed Size ◽  
Local Consistency ◽  
Sat Solvers ◽  
Clause Learning ◽  
Do So

Local consistency techniques such as k-consistency are a key component of specialised solvers for constraint satisfaction problems. In this paper we show that the power of using k-consistency techniques on a constraint satisfaction problem is precisely captured by using a particular inference rule, which we call negative-hyper-resolution, on the standard direct encoding of the problem into Boolean clauses. We also show that current clause-learning SAT-solvers will discover in expected polynomial time any inconsistency that can be deduced from a given set of clauses using negative-hyper-resolvents of a fixed size. We combine these two results to show that, without being explicitly designed to do so, current clause-learning SAT-solvers efficiently simulate k-consistency techniques, for all fixed values of k. We then give some experimental results to show that this feature allows clause-learning SAT-solvers to efficiently solve certain families of constraint problems which are challenging for conventional constraint-programming solvers.

The Power of Local Consistency in Conjunctive Queries and Constraint Satisfaction Problems

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 1111-1145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Greco ◽  
Francesco Scarcello
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Local Consistency ◽  
Conjunctive Queries

scholarly journals Random Subcubes as a Toy Model for Constraint Satisfaction Problems

2008 ◽  
Vol 131 (6) ◽  
pp. 1121-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Mora ◽  
Lenka Zdeborová
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems

scholarly journals Finding robust solutions for constraint satisfaction problems with discrete and ordered domains by coverings

2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Climent ◽  
Richard J. Wallace ◽  
Miguel A. Salido ◽  
Federico Barber
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Robust Solutions

scholarly journals A fine-grained arc-consistency algorithm for non-normalized constraint satisfaction problems

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 733-744 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlene Arangú ◽  
Miguel Salido
Keyword(s):  
Constraint Satisfaction ◽  
Constraint Programming ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Search Space ◽  
Constraint Satisfaction Problems ◽  
Fine Grained ◽  
Arc Consistency ◽  
Life Problems ◽  
Programming Techniques ◽  
Np Complete

A fine-grained arc-consistency algorithm for non-normalized constraint satisfaction problems Constraint programming is a powerful software technology for solving numerous real-life problems. Many of these problems can be modeled as Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) and solved using constraint programming techniques. However, solving a CSP is NP-complete so filtering techniques to reduce the search space are still necessary. Arc-consistency algorithms are widely used to prune the search space. The concept of arc-consistency is bidirectional, i.e., it must be ensured in both directions of the constraint (direct and inverse constraints). Two of the most well-known and frequently used arc-consistency algorithms for filtering CSPs are AC3 and AC4. These algorithms repeatedly carry out revisions and require support checks for identifying and deleting all unsupported values from the domains. Nevertheless, many revisions are ineffective, i.e., they cannot delete any value and consume a lot of checks and time. In this paper, we present AC4-OP, an optimized version of AC4 that manages the binary and non-normalized constraints in only one direction, storing the inverse founded supports for their later evaluation. Thus, it reduces the propagation phase avoiding unnecessary or ineffective checking. The use of AC4-OP reduces the number of constraint checks by 50% while pruning the same search space as AC4. The evaluation section shows the improvement of AC4-OP over AC4, AC6 and AC7 in random and non-normalized instances.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document