A Formal Framework for Complex Event Recognition

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-49
Author(s):  
Alejandro Grez ◽  
Cristian Riveros ◽  
Martín Ugarte ◽  
Stijn Vansummeren

Complex event recognition (CER) has emerged as the unifying field for technologies that require processing and correlating distributed data sources in real time. CER finds applications in diverse domains, which has resulted in a large number of proposals for expressing and processing complex events. Existing CER languages lack a clear semantics, however, which makes them hard to understand and generalize. Moreover, there are no general techniques for evaluating CER query languages with clear performance guarantees. In this article, we embark on the task of giving a rigorous and efficient framework to CER. We propose a formal language for specifying complex events, called complex event logic (CEL), that contains the main features used in the literature and has a denotational and compositional semantics. We also formalize the so-called selection strategies, which had only been presented as by-design extensions to existing frameworks. We give insight into the language design trade-offs regarding the strict sequencing operators of CEL and selection strategies. With a well-defined semantics at hand, we discuss how to efficiently process complex events by evaluating CEL formulas with unary filters. We start by introducing a formal computational model for CER, called complex event automata (CEA), and study how to compile CEL formulas with unary filters into CEA. Furthermore, we provide efficient algorithms for evaluating CEA over event streams using constant time per event followed by output-linear delay enumeration of the results.

Author(s):  
Rodrigo S. Couto ◽  
Stefano Secci ◽  
Miguel Elias M. Campista ◽  
Luis Henrique M.K. Costa

Koedoe ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Fullman ◽  
Gregory A. Kiker ◽  
Angela Gaylard ◽  
Jane Southworth ◽  
Peter Waylen ◽  
...  

Animals and humans regularly make trade-offs between competing objectives. In Addo Elephant National Park (AENP), elephants (Loxodonta africana) trade off selection of resources, while managers balance tourist desires with conservation of elephants and rare plants. Elephant resource selection has been examined in seasonal savannas, but is understudied in aseasonal systems like AENP. Understanding elephant selection may suggest ways to minimise management trade-offs. We evaluated how elephants select vegetation productivity, distance to water, slope and terrain ruggedness across time in AENP and used this information to suggest management strategies that balance the needs of tourists and biodiversity. Resource selection functions with time-interacted covariates were developed for female elephants, using three data sets of daily movement to capture circadian and annual patterns of resource use. Results were predicted in areas of AENP currently unavailable to elephants to explore potential effects of future elephant access. Elephants displayed dynamic resource selection at daily and annual scales to meet competing requirements for resources. In summer, selection patterns generally conformed to those seen in savannas, but these relationships became weaker or reversed in winter. At daily scales, resource selection in the morning differed from that of midday and afternoon, likely reflecting trade-offs between acquiring sufficient forage and water. Dynamic selection strategies exist even in an aseasonal system, with both daily and annual patterns. This reinforces the importance of considering changing resource availability and trade-offs in studies of animal selection.Conservation implications: Guiding tourism based on knowledge of elephant habitat selection may improve viewing success without requiring increased elephant numbers. If AENP managers expand elephant habitat to reduce density, our model predicts where elephant use may concentrate and where botanical reserves may be needed to protect rare plants from elephant impacts.


2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 686-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhabrata Bhattacharya ◽  
Ramin Mehran ◽  
Rahul Sukthankar ◽  
Mubarak Shah

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 313-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikos Giatrakos ◽  
Elias Alevizos ◽  
Alexander Artikis ◽  
Antonios Deligiannakis ◽  
Minos Garofalakis

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 1-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Alevizos ◽  
Anastasios Skarlatidis ◽  
Alexander Artikis ◽  
Georgios Paliouras

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 6-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darko Anicic ◽  
Sebastian Rudolph ◽  
Paul Fodor ◽  
Nenad Stojanovic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document