New clues on concussion impacts, and the virus strikes wild mink

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (8) ◽  
pp. 2030-2035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl Ljungvall ◽  
Ulf Magnusson ◽  
Marcus Korvela ◽  
Mattias Norrby ◽  
Jonas Bergquist ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. WOBESER ◽  
M. SWIFT
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 366-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Jakubczak ◽  
Marek Kowalczyk ◽  
Krzysztof Kostro ◽  
Grazyna Jezewska-Witkowska

1997 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ben-David

In many species of seasonally breeding mammals, reproduction occurs later at higher latitudes. Records of timing of reproduction in free-ranging American mink (Mustela vison) in North America and Europe suggest a similar trend. Observations on mink in southeast Alaska, however, revealed a deviation from this pattern, suggesting that factors other than latitude and associated day length may affect timing of breeding for this species in this area. I investigated timing of reproduction and body condition of wild, free-ranging mink on Chichagof Island, southeast Alaska, and hypothesized that seasonal food availability, especially abundant carcasses of spawning Pacific salmon (Onchorhynchus sp.), would determine timing of breeding in this population of mink. Blood progesterone levels, body condition, and testicle lengths were recorded for 24 adult mink, livetrapped from mid-March to late July in 1992 and 1993. Results suggest that these free-ranging mink mate during the later part of April to early May, and parturition occurs in late June to early July. Although male mink seemed to respond to photoperiodism in initiating reproduction, timing of reproduction in female mink was shifted so that lactation coincided with the availability of carcasses of Pacific salmon.


1969 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT S. DORNEY ◽  
LLOYD H. LAUERMAN
Keyword(s):  

1988 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Foley ◽  
Samuel J. Jackling ◽  
Ronald J. Sloan ◽  
Mark K. Brown
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
pp. 443-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bowman ◽  
Kaela Beauclerc ◽  
A. Hossain Farid ◽  
Heather Fenton ◽  
Cornelya F.C. Klütsch ◽  
...  

Farmed American mink (Neovison vison (Schreber, 1777)) pose a risk to biodiversity owing to escape and release from farms. Feral mink may affect native species in locations where American mink are not endemic, such as Europe. In contrast, escaping domestic mink may hybridize with wild mink in North America, leading to introgression of domestic traits via hybrid-mediated gene flow. We tested this idea in eastern Canada, which has a history of mink farming. We sampled known domestic and free-ranging mink, and profiled 508 individuals at 15 microsatellite loci. We found that 33% of free-ranging mink were either escaped domestic individuals, domestic–wild hybrids, or were introgressed to domestic or wild parental groups. The greatest prevalence of free-ranging domestic, hybrid, or introgressed mink (59%) occurred in Nova Scotia, which also had the most mink farms. Historic (1980s or earlier) mink sampled from museums had higher allelic richness and private allelic richness than contemporary wild mink. Domestic mink are artificially selected for traits desired by farmers, and as such, introgression with wild mink may lead to a loss of local adaptation. Our findings demonstrate that continued escape and release of mink could pose risks to the maintenance of genetic integrity in wild mink.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document