Imaging Performance with Different Doses in Skeletal Radiography: Comparison of a Needle-structured and a Conventional Storage Phosphor System with a Flat-Panel Detector

Radiology ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 250 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Wirth ◽  
Marcus Treitl ◽  
Maximilian F. Reiser ◽  
Markus Körner
Keyword(s):  
Flat Panel ◽  
Storage Phosphor ◽  
Flat Panel Detector ◽  
Skeletal Radiography ◽  
Imaging Performance ◽  
Different Doses ◽  
Storage Phosphor System

Digital Chest Radiography with a Selenium-Based Flat-Panel Detector Versus a Storage Phosphor System

2000 ◽  
Vol 175 (4) ◽  
pp. 1013-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Mo Goo ◽  
Jung-Gi Im ◽  
Jong Hyo Kim ◽  
Joon Beom Seo ◽  
Tae Sung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chest Radiography ◽  
Flat Panel ◽  
Storage Phosphor ◽  
Flat Panel Detector ◽  
Digital Chest ◽  
Storage Phosphor System

Reducing dose in urography while maintaining image quality—a comparison of storage phosphor plates and a flat-panel detector

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 221-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margareta Jansson ◽  
Håkan Geijer ◽  
Jan Persliden ◽  
Torbjörn Andersson
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Flat Panel ◽  
Storage Phosphor ◽  
Flat Panel Detector ◽  
Phosphor Plates

Impact of digital imaging on radiation doses to the patient during X-ray examination of the urinary tract

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 657-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Sjöholm ◽  
H. Geijer ◽  
J. Persliden
Keyword(s):  
Dose Reduction ◽  
Intravenous Urography ◽  
Radiation Doses ◽  
Flat Panel ◽  
Storage Phosphor ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Dose Area Product ◽  
Flat Panel Detector ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Phosphor Plates

Purpose: To compare radiation doses given to patients undergoing IVU (intravenous urography) before and after digitalization of our X-ray department. Material and Methods: IVU examinations were monitored with dose area product meters before and after the X-ray department changed to digital techniques. The first step was a change from film-screen to storage phosphor plates, while the second step involved changing to a flat panel detector. Forty-two patients were included for the film-screen situation, 69 when using the storage phosphor plates, and 70 using the flat panel detector. Results: A dose reduction from 41.8 Gycm2 to 31.5 Gycm2 was achieved with the first step when the film-screen system was replaced with storage phosphor plates. A further reduction to 12.1 Gycm2 was achieved using the flat panel detector. Conclusion: The introduction of the flat panel detectors made a considerable dose reduction possible.

The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography

1996 ◽  
Vol 69 (819) ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
D S Brettle ◽  
A Workman ◽  
R P Ellwood ◽  
J H Launders ◽  
K Horner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dental Radiography ◽  
Storage Phosphor ◽  
Imaging Performance ◽  
Storage Phosphor System

Comparison of low-contrast detail perception on storage phosphor radiographs and digital flat panel detector images

2001 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Peer ◽  
U. Neitzel ◽  
S.M. Giacomuzzi ◽  
R. Peer ◽  
E. Gassner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Flat Panel ◽  
Low Contrast ◽  
Storage Phosphor ◽  
Flat Panel Detector

scholarly journals A Flat‐Panel Detector Digital Radiography and a Storage Phosphor Computed Radiography: Screening for Pneumoconioses

2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Takashima ◽  
Narufumi Suganuma ◽  
Hirofumi Sakurazawa ◽  
Harumi Itoh ◽  
Harukazu Hirano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Radiography ◽  
Computed Radiography ◽  
Flat Panel ◽  
Storage Phosphor ◽  
Flat Panel Detector
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document