Distal lower extremity arteries: evaluation with two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography.

Radiology ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 207 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
H M Lee ◽  
Y Wang ◽  
H D Sostman ◽  
L H Schwartz ◽  
N M Khilnani ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 1464-1472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann H. Kim ◽  
Andrew J. Shevitz ◽  
Katherine L. Morrow ◽  
Daniel E. Kendrick ◽  
Karem Harth ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 891-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla A. Winchester ◽  
Howard M. Lee ◽  
Neil M. Khilnani ◽  
Yi Wang ◽  
David W. Trost ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 236 (3) ◽  
pp. 1083-1093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen K. Willmann ◽  
Bernhard Baumert ◽  
Thomas Schertler ◽  
Simon Wildermuth ◽  
Thomas Pfammatter ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-740
Author(s):  
Te-Chang Wu ◽  
Yu-Kun Tsui ◽  
Tai-Yuan Chen ◽  
Ching-Chung Ko ◽  
Chien-Jen Lin ◽  
...  

Background To investigate the discrepancy between two-dimensional digital subtraction angiography and three-dimensional rotational angiography for small (<5 mm) cerebral aneurysms and the impact on decision making among neuro-interventional experts as evaluated by online questionnaire. Materials and methods Eight small (<5 mm) ruptured aneurysms were visually identified in 16 image sets in either two-dimensional or three-dimensional format for placement in a questionnaire for 11 invited neuro-interventionalists. For each set, two questions were posed: Question 1: “Which of the following is the preferred treatment choice: simple coiling, balloon remodeling or stent assisted coiling?”; Question 2: “Is it achievable to secure the aneurysm with pure simple coiling?” The discrepancies of angio-architecture parameters and treatment choices between two-dimensional-digital subtraction angiography and three-dimensional rotational angiography were evaluated. Results In all eight cases, the neck images via three-dimensional rotational angiography were larger than two-dimensional-digital subtraction angiography with a mean difference of 0.95 mm. All eight cases analyzed with three-dimensional rotational angiography, but only one case with two-dimensional-digital subtraction angiography were classified as wide-neck aneurysms with dome-to-neck ratio < 1.5. The treatment choices based on the two-dimensional or three-dimensional information were different in 56 of 88 (63.6%) paired answers. Simple coiling was the preferred choice in 66 (75%) and 26 (29.6%) answers based on two-dimensional and three-dimensional information, respectively. Three types of angio-architecture with a narrow gap between the aneurysm sidewall and parent artery were proposed as an explanation for neck overestimation with three-dimensional rotational angiography. Conclusions Aneurysm neck overestimation with three-dimensional rotational angiography predisposed neuro-interventionalists to more complex treatment techniques. Additional two-dimensional information is crucial for endovascular treatment planning for small cerebral aneurysms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document