Comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight dynamic magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography in popliteal artery entrapment syndrome

1997 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 385
2021 ◽  
pp. 197140092110217
Author(s):  
Miho Gomyo ◽  
Kazuhiro Tsuchiya ◽  
Shun Goto ◽  
Shinsuke Hosoi ◽  
Takahiro Tahara ◽  
...  

Purpose After stent-assisted treatment for intracranial diseases, three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography is a noninvasive follow-up method, but susceptibility artifacts prevent accurate evaluations of stented arteries. Sampling perfection with application-optimized contrast using different flip angle evolution (SPACE) sequence often used for vessel wall imaging is less susceptible to susceptibility artifacts, since it is a spin-echo sequence. Hence, we evaluated the feasibility of black-blood magnetic resonance angiography generated from vessel wall imaging data obtained using the SPACE sequence in the depiction of stented arteries by comparing with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Methods Our study group comprised 11 consecutive patients. For both three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and black-blood magnetic resonance angiography, the contrast ratio obtained from the stented artery and the normal artery proximal to the stent were calculated. And the depiction of stented arteries was visually evaluated. Additionally, the relative diameter index obtained from the stented artery and the normal artery proximal to the stent were calculated for three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, black-blood magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Results The contrast ratio of the stented artery was significantly lower than that of the normal artery on three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography, but no significant difference was seen using black-blood magnetic resonance angiography. Regarding both the diameter index and the visual assessment score, black-blood magnetic resonance angiography was significantly better than three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. On black-blood magnetic resonance angiography, the diameter index was equal to that of digital subtraction angiography, and the flow signal was homogeneous and continuous in most the cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document