The utility of dual-energy computed tomography angiography for the evaluation of brain aneurysms after endovascular coiling: a prospective study

Background Non-invasive alternatives to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for follow-up of patients with coiled aneurysms are sought. Purpose To compare a novel method of dual-energy computed tomography angiography (DE-CTA) for postoperative assessment of coiled brain aneurysms to detect aneurysm recanalization and patency of adjacent blood vessels, with DSA. Material and Methods Patients who underwent endovascular cerebral aneurysm coiling were prospectively evaluated postoperatively by both DE-CTA and conventional DSA. CTA was performed using a novel dual-energy method with single-source and fast kilovoltage switching. DSA was performed using biplanar cerebral angiography. An experienced neuroradiologist and neurosurgeon, both blinded to the original radiological results, reviewed the images. Results A total of 54 patients (16 men, 38 women; mean age=47.6 + 9 years) with 55 coiled aneurysms were enrolled in our study between July 2014 and June 2015: 29 patients had suffered a subarachnoid hemorrhage and 26 patients had an incidentally found cerebral aneurysm. All patients had at least one DSA and DE-CTA performed at most one week apart. DE-CTA showed a 100% sensitivity and specificity in detection of complete aneurysm occlusion and 80% sensitivity and specificity for detection of residual necks and domes. DE-CTA successfully detected all vascular diameter changes as comparable to DSA with minimal interfering artifact. Conclusion DE-CTA is a promising non-invasive alternative to conventional catheter-based angiography for identification of aneurysm recurrence and assessment of adjacent arteries after endovascular coiling. It allows for far more rapid image acquisition than DSA, is non-invasive, and is widely available at clinical centers.

In-hospital complication–related risk factors for discharge and 90-day outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage after surgical clipping and endovascular coiling: a propensity score–matched analysis

OBJECTIVE More than 10 years have passed since the two best-known clinical trials of ruptured aneurysms (International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial [ISAT] and Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial [BRAT]) indicated that endovascular coiling (EC) was superior to surgical clipping (SC). However, in recent years, the development of surgical techniques has greatly improved; thus, it is necessary to reanalyze the impact of the differences in treatment modalities on the prognosis of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed all aSAH patients admitted to their institution between January 2015 and December 2020. The functional outcomes at discharge and 90 days after discharge were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). In-hospital complications, hospital charges, and risk factors derived from multivariate logistic regression were analyzed in the SC and EC groups after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate each independent predictor’s prediction ability between treatment groups. RESULTS A total of 844 aSAH patients were included. After PSM to control for sex, aneurysm location, Hunt and Hess grade, World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grade, modified Fisher Scale grade, and current smoking and alcohol abuse status, 329 patients who underwent SC were compared with 329 patients who underwent EC. Patients who underwent SC had higher incidences of unfavorable discharge and 90-day outcomes (46.5% vs 33.1%, p < 0.001; and 19.6% vs 13.8%, p = 0.046, respectively), delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) (31.3% vs 20.1%, p = 0.001), intracranial infection (20.1% vs 1.2%, p < 0.001), anemia (42.2% vs 17.6%, p < 0.001), hypoproteinemia (46.2% vs 21.6%, p < 0.001), and pneumonia (33.4% vs 24.9%, p = 0.016); but a lower incidence of urinary tract infection (1.2% vs 5.2%, p = 0.004) and lower median hospital charges ($12,285 [IQR $10,399–$15,569] vs $23,656 [IQR $18,816–$30,025], p < 0.001). A positive correlation between the number of in-hospital complications and total hospital charges was indicated in the SC (r = 0.498, p < 0.001) and EC (r = 0.411, p < 0.001) groups. The occurrence of pneumonia and DCI, WFNS grade IV or V, and age were common independent risk factors for unfavorable outcomes at discharge and 90 days after discharge in both treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS EC shows advantages in discharge and 90-day outcomes, in-hospital complications, and the number of risk factors but increases the economic cost on patients during their hospital stay. Severe in-hospital complications such as pneumonia and DCI may have a long-lasting impact on the prognosis of patients.

A randomized controlled study comparing microsurgical clipping via the keyhole approach, conventional craniotomy, and endovascular coiling for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms

Objective: Few prospective randomized controlled studies have investigated the efficacy of endovascular treatment and microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms, especially via microsurgical keyhole approach. We compared the efficacy of three techniques in treating patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms to provide surgeons with a more objective basis for treatment selection. Methods: 150 patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms were randomly assigned to endovascular treatment, conventional craniotomy, and keyhole approach groups. Aneurysm occlusion, surgical time, hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, and surgical complications were compared between groups. Results: The complete occlusion rates of aneurysms at discharge were 90% in the endovascular group, 94% in the conventional group, and 96% in the keyhole group. No significant differences in complete occlusion rates or Glasgow Outcome Scale scores were found between groups. In the keyhole approach, conventional craniotomy, and endovascular groups, the overall surgical times were 161.78±34.51 min, 201.55±38.79 min, and 85.86±58.57 min, respectively; the hospitalization times were 11.42±6.64 d, 18.03±7.14 d, and 10.57±8.67 d; hospitalization expenses were 10574.25±4154.25 USD, 13214.54±5487.65 USD, and 20134.58±6587.61 USD; and the incidence rates of postoperative complications such as intracranial infection, cerebral vasospasm, hydrocephalus, intracranial hematoma, and epilepsy were 8%, 28%, and 20%. Conclusions: Endovascular coiling and the microsurgical keyhole approach have the advantages of simple execution, time savings, and short hospitalization. Microsurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms needs to be updated to a minimally invasive procedure to maintain its complementary value with endovascular treatment.Clinical trial registration: The study has been retrospectively registered in clinicaltrial.org (NCT05049564) in Sep. 8th, 2021.

Selection bias in patients proposed for neurosurgical versus endovascular treatment of aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery

Background Microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling are viable treatment options for posterior communicating artery (PComA) aneurysms, but there are still major limitations to evidence-based decisions regarding standard-of-care treatment. In this study, we aimed at assessing potential selection biases that may influence our ability to extract conclusions about the comparative effectiveness or efficacy of the aneurysm treatment. Objective To study the patient/aneurysm characteristics as possible biases in the option for endovascular or neurosurgical treatment of PComA aneurysms. Methods A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed, including all patients with treated PComA aneurysms with neurosurgical clipping or endovascular coiling between January 2010 and January 2021. Clinical and morphological data were collected from electronic records, and statistical analysis was performed. Results A total of 64 patients was eligible for inclusion; 24 (37.5%) patients were proposed for neurosurgical treatment, while 40 (62.5%) for endovascular treatment; 10 patients (25%) crossed over to the clipping group whereas none crossed over to the coiling side. Actual treatment analysis showed significantly higher diameters of mother vessel (t-test, p = 0.034) and aneurysm neck (Mann–Whitney, p = 0.029) in the clipping group and higher aspect and dome-to-neck ratios in the endovascular group (Mann–Whitney, p = 0.008). A significantly higher vasospasm frequency was found in the clipping group but only in the intention-to-treat analysis (Chi-square, p = 0.032). Conclusion Significant morphological differences between effective endovascular and surgical groups and differences in intention-to-treat analysis may limit the validity of a direct comparison between treatment options and suggest the presence of a possible selection bias.

Saccular aneurysms in the post–Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial era

OBJECTIVE The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial (BRAT) was a single-center trial that compared endovascular coiling to microsurgical clipping in patients treated for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, because patients in the BRAT were treated more than 15 years ago, and because there have been advances since then—particularly in endovascular techniques—the relevance of the BRAT today remains controversial. Some hypothesize that these technical advances may reduce retreatment rates for endovascular intervention. In this study, the authors analyzed data for the post-BRAT (PBRAT) era to compare microsurgical clipping with endovascular embolization (coiling and flow diverters) in the two time periods and to examine how the results of the original BRAT have influenced the practice of neurosurgeons at the study institution. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, the authors evaluated patients with saccular aSAHs who were treated at a single quaternary center from August 1, 2007, to July 31, 2019. The saccular aSAH diagnoses were confirmed by cerebrovascular experts. Patients were separated into two cohorts for comparison on the basis of having undergone microsurgery or endovascular intervention. The primary outcome analyzed for comparison was poor neurological outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score > 2. The secondary outcomes that were compared included retreatment rates for both therapies. RESULTS Of the 1014 patients with aSAH during the study period, 798 (79%) were confirmed to have saccular aneurysms. Neurological outcomes at ≥ 1-year follow-up did not differ between patients treated with microsurgery (n = 451) and those who received endovascular (n = 347) treatment (p = 0.51). The number of retreatments was significantly higher among patients treated endovascularly (32/347, 9%) than among patients treated microsurgically (6/451, 1%) (p < 0.001). The retreatment rate after endovascular treatment was lower in the PBRAT era (9%) than in the BRAT (18%). CONCLUSIONS Similar to results from the BRAT, results from the PBRAT era showed equivalent neurological outcomes and increased rates of retreatment among patients undergoing endovascular embolization compared with those undergoing microsurgery. However, the rate of retreatment after endovascular intervention was much lower in the PBRAT era than in the BRAT.

Successful endovascular coiling of infectious cerebral aneurysm following Staphylococcus haemolyticus endocarditis

Recent reports suggest that Staphylococcus haemolyticus can cause infective endocarditis (IE). However, no data are available regarding infectious intracranial aneurysm (IIA) following S. haemolyticus endocarditis. Endovascular coiling is a challenging approach for the treatment of IIA. We describe the case of a 63-year-old woman who suddenly developed aphasia and dysarthria following an acute cerebral infarction in her left insular and temporal cortex. After a total hysterectomy at the age of 39, the patient had suffered from recurrent bacterial pyomyositis in her legs. At admission, there was no evidence of cerebral aneurysm, as assessed by magnetic resonance angiography, and no vegetation, as assessed by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), resulting in an incorrect diagnosis. However, subarachnoid hemorrhage and development of cerebral aneurysm in the left middle cerebral artery occurred within 1 week of hospitalization. Continuous positive blood culture results and a second TEE finally revealed that IE was caused by S. haemolyticus. Coil embolization of the IIA was successful on day 26 after symptom onset; after this procedure, the patient began to recover. This case demonstrates that S. haemolyticus-induced endocarditis can cause IIA. Endovascular coiling is a potentially effective approach to treat IIA.