Müllerian Duct Anomalies: Role in Fertility and Pregnancy

Radiographics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1857-1875
Author(s):  
Mark D. Sugi ◽  
Rubal Penna ◽  
Priyanka Jha ◽  
Liina Pōder ◽  
Spencer C. Behr ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naina Kumar ◽  
Ashu Yadav

Aims: Present study was conducted to know presentations and nature of Müllerian-duct anomalies in rural women. Background: Müllerian anomalies are congenital defects of female reproductive tract resulting from faulty development and fusion of Müllerian ducts. Objectives: To identify common Müllerian anomalies, their presentation, radiological appearances, complications, associated renal anomalies in rural women of Northern India. Methods: Present observational study was conducted on 181 female patients with suspected Müllerian anomalies presenting to the outpatient department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with various complaints. Data included age, religion, menarche, previous pregnancy if any, duration of infertility, presenting complaints, type of Müllerian anomaly, incidental or symptomatic, diagnostic method, associated anomalies. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 22.0 version software. Results: Of 181 patients, 16.5% were adolescents, 83.5% adult women with an overall mean (SD) age of 25.02 (5.96) years. Of these, 170 had true Müllerian-duct anomalies and 11 had defects other than Müllerian anomalies, hence excluded. Total 158(92.9%) patients were symptomatic and 12(7.1%) asymptomatic at presentation. The majority (75.9%) were diagnosed incidentally during their visit to the department for various complaints of which infertility (32.4%) was most common. Septate uterus (29.4%) was most common anomaly diagnosed followed by Müllerian agenesis/hypoplasia (22.9%). Around 11.2% cases had associated renal and collecting system anomalies with unilateral renal agenesis (47.4%) being most common. Conclusion: Hence, Müllerian-duct anomalies have diverse presentations and most of them are diagnosed incidentally. Other: The exact prevalence of Müllerian-duct anomalies may be high, especially in rural India due to lack of knowledge and societal pressures.


QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S B Ali ◽  
A M Salama ◽  
Z A Mahmoud

Abstract Background Müllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) occur as a result from abnormal development of the uterus, cervix, and upper vagina. Many classification systems are presented, aiming to provide a more suitable and accurate categorization of female genital anomalies. Ultrasonography (US), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), or a combination of both are considered the gold standard in evaluation of uterine anomalies. Aim of the Work The main purpose of the study is to determine the diagnostic role of MRI and US in assessment of Müllerian duct anomalies and its subtypes. Patients and Methods This prospective analytical study was conducted at 14 patients suspected to have MDAs at Al-Demerdash Hospital-Ain Shams University in the period from September 2017 to May 2018, Their ages ranged from 15-40 year-old. All cases underwent Pelvic U/S and MRI, findings were correlated with laparoscopy. Results In this study the Mullerian duct anomalies were categorized into four groups: (a) congenital absence of the Müllerian ducts, or the Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (n = 8), (b) disorders of vertical fusion (n = 1),(c) disorders of lateral fusion (n = 3) and (d) MDAs mimics(n = 2).MRI allowed correct diagnosis of 14 uterine anomalies (accuracy 100%) whereas US was correct in 13 out of 14 cases (accuracy 92.8%). Conclusion Two dimensional ultrasound stands as the first imaging modality of choice. MRI remains the reference imaging modality in diagnosis of Mullerian anomalies and it is subtypes and should be preserved for doubtful or complex cases.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinxia Chen ◽  
Guangyu Li ◽  
Yingying Qin ◽  
Yuqian Cui ◽  
Li You ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document