Vestibular modulation of skin sympathetic nerve activity in sopite syndrome induced by low-frequency sinusoidal motion

2020 ◽  
Vol 124 (6) ◽  
pp. 1551-1559
Author(s):  
Monique Foster ◽  
Natasha Singh ◽  
Kenny Kwok ◽  
Vaughan G. Macefield
Keyword(s):  
Hair Cells ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Linear Acceleration ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Sinusoidal Motion ◽  
Low Amplitude ◽  
Cutaneous Vasoconstriction

Little is known about the autonomic consequences of sopite syndrome—the drowsiness that can be induced by low-amplitude cyclic motion. We recorded skin sympathetic nerve activity (SSNA) in seated participants exposed to slow sinusoidal linear acceleration (0.03–0.2 Hz), which preferentially activates hair cells in the utricular part of the otolithic organs, at amplitudes that generated no sensations of motion. At all frequencies, there was a clear vestibular modulation of SSNA and cutaneous vasoconstriction.

Relation between QT interval variability and muscle sympathetic nerve activity in normal subjects

2015 ◽  
Vol 309 (7) ◽  
pp. H1218-H1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima El-Hamad ◽  
Elisabeth Lambert ◽  
Derek Abbott ◽  
Mathias Baumert
Keyword(s):  
Supine Position ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Qt Interval ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Head Up Tilt ◽  
Low Frequency Power

Beat-to-beat variability of the QT interval (QTV) is sought to provide an indirect noninvasive measure of sympathetic nerve activity, but a formal quantification of this relationship has not been provided. In this study we used power contribution analysis to study the relationship between QTV and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). ECG and MSNA were recorded in 10 healthy subjects in the supine position and after 40° head-up tilt. Power spectrum analysis was performed using a linear autoregressive model with two external inputs: heart period (RR interval) variability (RRV) and MSNA. Total and low-frequency power of QTV was decomposed into contributions by RRV, MSNA, and sources independent of RRV and MSNA. Results show that the percentage of MSNA power contribution to QT is very small and does not change with tilt. RRV power contribution to QT power is notable and decreases with tilt, while the greatest percentage of QTV is independent of RRV and MSNA in the supine position and after 40° head-up tilt. In conclusion, beat-to-beat QTV in normal subjects does not appear to be significantly affected by the rhythmic modulations in MSNA following low to moderate orthostatic stimulation. Therefore, MSNA oscillations may not represent a useful surrogate for cardiac sympathetic nerve activity at moderate levels of activation, or, alternatively, sympathetic influences on QTV are complex and not quantifiable with linear shift-invariant autoregressive models.

Importance of ventilation in modulating interaction between sympathetic drive and cardiovascular variability

2001 ◽  
Vol 280 (2) ◽  
pp. H722-H729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippe Van De Borne ◽  
Nicola Montano ◽  
Krzysztof Narkiewicz ◽  
Jean P. Degaute ◽  
Alberto Malliani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Minute Ventilation ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Cardiovascular Variability ◽  
Controlled Breathing ◽  
End Tidal ◽  
Cardiovascular Rhythms

Chemoreflex stimulation elicits both hyperventilation and sympathetic activation, each of which may have different influences on oscillatory characteristics of cardiovascular variability. We examined the influence of hyperventilation on the interactions between changes in R-R interval (RR) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and changes in neurocirculatory variability, in 14 healthy subjects. We performed spectral analysis of RR and MSNA variability during each of the following interventions: 1) controlled breathing, 2) maximal end-expiratory apnea, 3) isocapnic voluntary hyperventilation, and 4) hypercapnia-induced hyperventilation. MSNA increased from 100% during controlled breathing to 170 ± 25% during apnea ( P = 0.02). RR was unchanged, but normalized low-frequency (LF) variability of both RR and MSNA increased markedly ( P < 0.001). During isocapnic hyperventilation, minute ventilation increased to 20.2 ± 1.4 l/min ( P < 0.0001). During hypercapnic hyperventilation, minute ventilation also increased (to 19.7 ± 1.7 l/min) as did end-tidal CO2 (both P < 0.0001). MSNA remained unchanged during isocapnic hyperventilation (104 ± 7%) but increased to 241 ± 49% during hypercapnic hyperventilation ( P < 0.01). RR decreased during both isocapnic and hypercapnic hyperventilation ( P < 0.05). However, normalized LF variability of RR and of MSNA decreased ( P < 0.05) during both isocapnic and hypercapnic hyperventilation, despite the tachycardia and heightened sympathetic nerve traffic. In conclusion, marked respiratory oscillations in autonomic drive induced by hyperventilation may induce dissociation between RR, MSNA, and neurocirculatory variability, perhaps by suppressing central genesis and/or inhibiting transmission of LF cardiovascular rhythms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document