Synchronization of motor-unit firings in several human muscles

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 2010-2023 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. De Luca ◽  
A. M. Roy ◽  
Z. Erim

1. Synchronization of concurrently active motor-unit firings was studied in six human muscles performing isometric constant-force contractions at 30% of the maximal level. The myoelectric signal was detected with a quadrifilar needle electrode and was decomposed into its constituent motor-unit action-potential trains with the Precision Decomposition technique, whose accuracy has been proven previously. 2. Synchronization was considered as the tendency of two motor units to fire at fixed time intervals with respect to each other more often than would be expected if the motor units fired independently. A rigorous statistical technique was used to measure the presence of peaks in the cross-interval histogram of pairs of motor-unit action-potential trains. The location of the center of peak as well as their width and amplitude were measured. A synch index was developed to measure the percentage of firings that were synchronized. The percentage of concurrently active motor-unit pairs that contained synchronized firings was measured. 3. Synchronization of motor-unit firings was observed to occur in two modalities. The short-term modality was seen as a peak in the cross-interval histogram centered about zero-time delay (0.5 +/- 2.9 ms, mean +/- SD) and with an average width of 4.5 +/- 2.5 ms. The long-term modality was seen as a peak centered at latencies ranging from 8 to 76 ms. On the average, the peaks of the long-term synchronization were 36% lower but had approximately the same width as the peaks for the short-term synchronization. Short-term synchronization was seen in 60% of the motor-unit paris, whereas long-term synchronization was seen in 10% of the pairs. 4. Short-term synchronization occurred in bursts of consecutive firings, ranging in number from 1 to 10, with 91% of all synchronized firing occurring in groups of 1 or 2; and the bursts of discharges appeared at sporadic times during the contraction. 5. The amount of synchronization in motor-unit pairs was found to be low. In the six muscles that were tested, an average of 8.0% of all the firings were short-term synchronized, and an average of 1.0% were long-term synchronized. The synch index was statistically indistinguishable (P = 0.07-0.89) among the different muscles and among 9 of the 11 subjects tested. 6. Sixty percent of concurrently active motor-unit pairs displayed short-term synchronization, 10% of the pairs displayed long-term synchronization, and 8% displayed both modalities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Author(s):  
David Burke ◽  
James Howells

The motor unit represent the final output of the motor system. Each consists of a motoneuron, its axon, neuromuscular junctions, and muscle fibres innervated by that axon. The discharge of a motor unit can be followed by recording its electromyographic signature, the motor unit action potential. Motoneurons are not passive responders to the excitatory and inhibitory influences on them from descending and segmental sources. Their properties can change, e.g. due to descending monoaminergic pathways, which can alter their responses to other inputs (changing ‘reflex gain’). Contraction strength depends on the number of active motor units, their discharge rate, and whether the innervated muscle fibres are slow-twitch producing low force, but resistant to fatigue, fast-twitch producing more force, but susceptible to fatigue, or intermediate fast-twitch fatigue-resistant. These properties are imposed by the parent motoneurons, and the innervated muscle fibres have different histochemical profiles (oxidative, glycolytic, or oxidative-glycolytic, respectively).


2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 2144-2158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott J. Day ◽  
Manuel Hulliger

Prompted by the observation that the slope of the relationship between average rectified electromyography (EMG) and the ensemble activation rate of a pool of motor units progressively decreased (showing a downward nonlinearity), an experimental study was carried out to test the widely held notion that the EMG is the simple algebraic sum of motor-unit action-potential trains. The experiments were performed on the cat soleus muscle under isometric conditions, using electrical stimulation of α-motor axons isolated in ventral root filaments. The EMG signals were simulated experimentally under conditions where the activation of nearly the entire pool of motor units or of subsets of motor units was completely controlled by the experimenter. Sets of individual motor units or of small groups of motor units were stimulated independently, using stimulation profiles that were strictly repeatable between trials. This permitted a rigorous quantitative comparison of EMGs that were recorded during combined activation of multiple motor filaments with EMGs that were synthesized from the algebraic summation of motor unit action potential trains generated by individual nerve filaments. These were recorded separately by individually stimulating the same filaments with the same activation profiles that were employed during combined stimulation. During combined activation of up to 10 motor filaments, experimentally recorded and computationally synthesized EMGs were virtually identical. This indicates that EMG signals indeed are the outcome of the simple algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains generated by concurrently active motor units. For both recorded and synthesized EMGs, it was confirmed that EMG magnitude increased nonlinearly with the ensemble activation rate of a pool of motor units. The nonlinearity was largely abolished when EMG magnitude was estimated as the sum of rectified, instead of raw, motor-unit action-potential trains. This suggests that the downward nonlinearity in the EMG-ensemble activation rate relation is due to signal cancellation arising from the perfectly linear summation of positive and negative components of action-potential waveforms. The findings provide a much needed post hoc validation of the concept of EMG generation by strict algebraic summation of motor unit action potentials that is generally relied on in theoretical modeling studies of EMG and in EMG decomposition algorithms.


2010 ◽  
Vol 108 (6) ◽  
pp. 1530-1541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoia C. Lateva ◽  
Kevin C. McGill ◽  
M. Elise Johanson

We studied the innervation and organization of motor units in the brachioradialis muscle of 25 normal human subjects. We recorded intramuscular EMG signals at points separated by 15 mm along the proximodistal muscle axis during moderate isometric contractions, identified from 27 to 61 (mean 39) individual motor units per subject using EMG decomposition, and estimated the locations of the endplates and distal muscle/tendon junctions from the motor-unit action potential (MUAP) propagation patterns and terminal standing waves. In three subjects all the motor units were innervated in a single endplate zone. In the other 22 subjects, the motor units were innervated in 3–6 (mean 4) distinct endplate zones separated by 15–55 mm along the proximodistal axis. One-third of the motor units had fibers innervated in more than one zone. The more distally innervated motor units had distinct terminal waves indicating tendonous termination, while the more proximal motor units lacked terminal waves, indicating intrafascicular termination. Analysis of blocked MUAP components revealed that 19% of the motor units had at least one doubly innervated fiber, i.e., a fiber innervated in two different endplate zones by two different motoneurons, and thus belonging to two different motor units. These results are consistent with the brachioradialis muscle having a series-fibered architecture consisting of multiple, overlapping bands of muscle fibers in most individuals and a simple parallel-fibered architecture in some individuals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document