Spontaneous and sound-evoked discharge characteristics of complex-spiking neurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the unanesthetized decerebrate cat

1995 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 550-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Parham ◽  
D. O. Kim

1. We examined the spontaneous and sound-evoked discharge characteristics of 20 complex-spiking units recorded in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) of 15 unanesthetized, decerebrate cats. 2. The extracellularly recorded complex spikes consisted of bursts of two to five action potentials whose size gradually decreased during the burst. Complex spikes were observed both in the spontaneous and sound-evoked activity of the units in our sample. 3. The spontaneous rates (SRs) of DCN complex-spiking units ranged from 0 to 30 spikes/s. Spontaneous activity consisted of complex and simple (i.e., the common single neuronal action potential) spikes. Comparison of the SR distributions of the DCN complex-spiking units with that of a total sample of 194 DCN units (from 9 cats) suggests that the complex-spiking units tended to be in the lower half of the DCN SR distribution. 4. Sound-evoked discharges could consist of both complex and simple spikes. On the basis of their sound-driven responses, we divided the DCN complex-spiking units into two groups. The majority (15 of 20, 75%) were weakly driven by pure tones and inhibited by broadband noise. They tended to have broad response areas. Their response latencies to pure tone and noise stimuli were relatively long (10-20 ms). The recording depths of these units tended to be superficial (i.e., 10 of 15 units were located within 400 microns of the dorsal surface of the DCN). A minority (5 of 20, 25%) of the complex-spiking units were strongly driven by pure tone and broadband noise stimuli. These units had more clearly defined excitatory regions of response areas than the weakly driven units. Their response latencies to pure tone and noise stimuli were short (< 10 ms). The recording depths of these units tended to be deeper (i.e., 4 of 5 units were located at 400-700 microns) than those of the weakly driven units. 5. Intracellular recording and labeling studies of in vitro DCN slice preparations have correlated complex spikes with the superficially located cartwheel cells. Given the complex spikes of the units, many of which were located superficially, we suggest that our sample, particularly the weakly driven group of neurons, corresponds to the cartwheel cells. 6. Cartwheel cells are putative inhibitory interneurons whose axons primarily contact on the main projection neurons of DCN, the fusiform cells. The present finding of sound-evoked discharges by the superficially located complex-spiking units suggests that cartwheel cells should play a role in modifying the sound-evoked responses of the fusiform cells.

2009 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 1287-1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaime G. Mancilla ◽  
Paul B. Manis

Individual neurons have been shown to exhibit target cell-specific synaptic function in several brain areas. The time course of the postsynaptic conductances (PSCs) strongly influences the dynamics of local neural networks. Cartwheel cells (CWCs) are the most numerous inhibitory interneurons in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). They are excited by parallel fiber synapses, which carry polysensory information, and in turn inhibit other CWCs and the main projection neurons of the DCN, pyramidal cells (PCs). CWCs have been implicated in “context-dependent” inhibition, producing either depolarizing (other CWCs) or hyperpolarizing (PCs) post synaptic potentials. In the present study, we used paired whole cell recordings to examine target-dependent inhibition from CWCs in neonatal rat DCN slices. We found that CWC inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) onto PCs are large (1.3 mV) and brief (half-width = 11.8 ms), whereas CWC IPSPs onto other CWCs are small (0.2 mV) and slow (half-width = 36.8 ms). Evoked IPSPs between CWCs exhibit paired-pulse facilitation, while CWC IPSPs onto PCs exhibit paired-pulse depression. Perforated-patch recordings showed that spontaneous IPSPs in CWCs are hyperpolarizing at rest with a mean estimated reversal potential of −67 mV. Spontaneous IPSCs were smaller and lasted longer in CWCs than in PCs, suggesting that the kinetics of the receptors are different in the two cell types. These results reveal that CWCs play a dual role in the DCN. The CWC-CWC network interactions are slow and sensitive to the average rate of CWC firing, whereas the CWC-PC network is fast and sensitive to transient changes in CWC firing.


2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 1705-1725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuil Kim ◽  
Laurence O. Trussell

Cartwheel cells are glycinergic interneurons that modify somatosensory input to the dorsal cochlear nucleus. They are characterized by firing of mixtures of both simple and complex action potentials. To understand what ion channels determine the generation of these two types of spike waveforms, we recorded from cartwheel cells using the gramicidin perforated-patch technique in brain slices of mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus and applied channel-selective blockers. Complex spikes were distinguished by whether they arose directly from a negative membrane potential or later during a long depolarization. Ca2+ channels and Ca2+-dependent K+ channels were major determinants of complex spikes. Onset complex spikes required T-type and possibly R-type Ca2+ channels and were shaped by BK and SK K+ channels. Complex spikes arising later in a depolarization were dependent on P/Q- and L-type Ca2+ channels as well as BK and SK channels. BK channels also contributed to fast repolarization of simple spikes. Simple spikes featured an afterdepolarization that is probably the trigger for complex spiking and is shaped by T/R-type Ca2+ and SK channels. Fast spikes were dependent on Na+ channels; a large persistent Na+ current may provide a depolarizing drive for spontaneous activity in cartwheel cells. Thus the diverse electrical behavior of cartwheel cells is determined by the interaction of a wide variety of ion channels with a prominent role played by Ca2+.


1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 248-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nace L. Golding ◽  
Donata Oertel

Golding, Nace L. and Donata Oertel. Physiological identification of the targets of cartwheel cells in the dorsal cochlear nucleus. J. Neurophysiol. 78: 248–260, 1997. The integrative contribution of cartwheel cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) was assessed with intracellular recordings from anatomically identified cells. Recordings were made, in slices of the cochlear nuclei of mice, from 58 cartwheel cells, 22 fusiform cells, 3 giant cells, 5 tuberculoventral cells, and 1 cell that is either a superficial stellate or Golgi cell. Cartwheel cells can be distinguished electrophysiologically from other cells of the cochlear nuclei by their complex spikes, which comprised two to four rapid action potentials superimposed on a slower depolarization. The rapid action potentials were blocked by tetrodotoxin ( n = 17) and were therefore mediated by voltage-sensitive sodium currents. The slow spikes were eliminated by the removal of calcium from the extracellular saline ( n = 3) and thus were mediated by voltage-sensitive calcium currents. The spontaneous and evoked firing patterns of cartwheel cells were distinctive. Cartwheel cells usually fired single and complex spikes spontaneously at irregular intervals of between 100 ms and several seconds. Shocks to the DCN elicited firing that lasted tens to hundreds of milliseconds. With the use of these distinctive firing patterns, together with a pharmacological dissection of postsynaptic potentials (PSPs), possible targets of cartwheel cells were identified and the function of the connections was examined. Not only cartwheel and fusiform cells, but also giant cells, received patterns of synaptic input consistent with their having originated from cartwheel cells. These cell types responded to shocks of the DCN with variable trains of PSPs that lasted hundreds of milliseconds. PSPs within these trains appeared both singly and in bursts of two to four, and were blocked by 0.5 or 1 μM strychnine ( n = 4 cartwheel, 4 fusiform, and 2 giant cells), indicating that cartwheel cells are likely to be glycinergic. In contrast with cartwheel cells, which are weakly excited by glycinergic input, glycinergic PSPs consistently inhibited fusiform and giant cells. Tuberculoventral cells and the putative superficial stellate cell received little or no spontaneous synaptic activity. Shocks to the DCN evoked synaptic activity that lasted ∼5 ms. These cells therefore probably do not receive input from cartwheel cells. In addition, the brief firing of tuberculoventral cells and of the putative superficial stellate cell in response to shocks indicates that these cells are unlikely to contribute to the late, glycinergic synaptic potentials observed in cartwheel, fusiform, and giant cells.


2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 2462-2473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Roberts ◽  
Laurence O. Trussell

In the outer layers of the dorsal cochlear nucleus, a cerebellum-like structure in the auditory brain stem, multimodal sensory inputs drive parallel fibers to excite both principal (fusiform) cells and inhibitory cartwheel cells. Cartwheel cells, in turn, inhibit fusiform cells and other cartwheel cells. At the microcircuit level, it is unknown how these circuit components interact to modulate the activity of fusiform cells and thereby shape the processing of auditory information. Using a variety of approaches in mouse brain stem slices, we investigated the synaptic connectivity and synaptic strength among parallel fibers, cartwheel cells, and fusiform cells. In paired recordings of spontaneous and evoked activity, we found little overlap in parallel fiber input to neighboring neurons, and activation of multiple parallel fibers was required to evoke or alter action potential firing in cartwheel and fusiform cells. Thus neighboring neurons likely respond best to distinct subsets of sensory inputs. In contrast, there was significant overlap in inhibitory input to neighboring neurons. In recordings from synaptically coupled pairs, cartwheel cells had a high probability of synapsing onto nearby fusiform cells or other nearby cartwheel cells. Moreover, single cartwheel cells strongly inhibited spontaneous firing in single fusiform cells. These synaptic relationships suggest that the set of parallel fibers activated by a particular sensory stimulus determines whether cartwheel cells provide feedforward or lateral inhibition to their postsynaptic targets.


1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 1019-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
William S. Rhode

The dorsal cochlear nucleus receives input from the auditory nerve and relays acoustic information to the inferior colliculus. Its principal cells receive two systems of inputs. One system through the molecular layer carries multimodal information that is processed through a neuronal circuit that resembles the cerebellum. A second system through the deep layer carries primary auditory nerve input, some of which is relayed through interneurons. The present study reveals the morphology of individual interneurons and their local axonal arbors and how these inhibitory interneurons respond to sound. Vertical cells lie beneath the fusiform cell layer. Their dendritic and axonal arbors are limited to an isofrequency lamina. They give rise to pericellular nests around the base of fusiform cells and their proximal basal dendrites. These cells exhibit an onset-graded response to short tones and have response features defined as type II. They have tuning curves that are closed contours (0 shaped), thresholds ∼27 dB SPL, spontaneous firing rates of ∼0 spikes/s, and they respond weakly or not at all to broadband noise, as described for type II units. Their responses are nonmonotonic functions of intensity with peak responses between 30 and 60 dB SPL. They also show a preference for the high-to-low direction of a frequency sweep. It has been suggested that these circuits may be involved in the processing of spectral cues for the localization of sound sources.


1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1384-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Zhang ◽  
D. Oertel

1. Intracellular recordings were made from identified cartwheel and stellate cells in the molecular and fusiform cell layers of the murine dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). The aim of the study was to identify and characterize their synaptic inputs and to learn how synaptic inputs and intrinsic electrical properties interact to generate firing patterns. 2. Eight cells labeled by the intracellular injection of biocytin were cartwheel cells. Their axon terminals extended from the deep part of the molecular layer through the fusiform cell layer. Their dendrites extended through the molecular layer and had spines. Both the dendritic and axonal arbors were small, having diameters of approximately 150 microns in the parasagittal plane. 3. When depolarized, cartwheel cells often fired bursts of rapid action potentials superimposed on a slow depolarization. The peaks of action potentials were usually overshooting. Individually occurring action potentials were followed by two afterhyperpolarizations, as in other cells of the DCN. During bursts, action potentials did not have two distinct repolarizing phases. 4. Excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) were recorded from cartwheel cells spontaneously and after shocks to the nerve root or to the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN). The EPSPs rose slowly. When they were suprathreshold they evoked action potentials singly or in bursts. EPSPs evoked by shocks to the nerve root or to the VCN had long latencies, the rise of EPSPs beginning between 5 and 10 ms after the shock. No inhibitory synaptic potentials, either spontaneous or driven with electrical stimulation, were detected in cells whose resting potentials were between -50 and -70 mV. 5. The locations from which excitatory input can be driven electrically are consistent with cartwheel cells receiving excitatory synaptic input from granule cells. 6. One labeled cell was a superficial stellate cell. It had smooth, straight dendrites that radiated parallel to the layers of the DCN; its axonal arbor was also planar and was restricted to the molecular layer. Both the dendritic and axonal arbors of this stellate cell were large, > 500 microns diam in the parasagittal plane. 7. The superficial stellate cell fired trains of action potentials at regular intervals that, like other cells of the DCN, were overshooting and were followed by double undershoots. 8. Shocks to the nerve root and to the surface of the VCN evoked EPSPs after 3.5 and 2 ms, respectively, in the superficial stellate cell. Chemical stimulation of the VCN also evoked excitation. No inhibitory synaptic input, spontaneous or driven, was detected.


2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 824-835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-Li Diana Ma ◽  
Stephan D. Brenowitz

Because of the availability of disease and genetic models, the mouse has become a valuable species for auditory neuroscience that will facilitate long-term goals of understanding neuronal mechanisms underlying the perception and processing of sounds. The goal of this study was to define the basic sound-evoked response properties of single neurons in the mouse dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). Neurons producing complex spikes were distinguished as cartwheel cells (CWCs), and other neurons were classified according to the response map scheme previously developed in DCN. Similar to observations in other rodent species, neurons of the mouse DCN exhibit relatively little sound-driven inhibition. As a result, type III was the most commonly observed response. Our findings are generally consistent with the model of DCN function that has been developed in the cat and the gerbil, suggesting that this in vivo mouse preparation will be a useful tool for future studies of auditory physiology.


1994 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 2446-2462 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Nelken ◽  
E. D. Young

1. The principal cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN) are mostly inhibited by best frequency (BF) tones but are mostly excited by broadband noise (BBN), producing the so-called type IV response characteristic. The narrowband inhibitory responses can be explained by the inhibitory influence of interneurons with type II response characteristics. However, it is not clear that all the details of the type IV responses can be accounted for by this neural circuit. In particular, many type IV units are inhibited by band-reject noise (notch noise); type II units tend to be only weakly excited by these stimuli, if at all. In this paper we study the relationships between the narrowband, inhibitory and the wideband, excitatory regimens of the type IV responses and present the case for the existence of a second inhibitory source in DCN, called the wideband inhibitor (WBI) below. 2. Type IV units were studied using pure tones, noise bands arithmetically centered on BF, notch noise centered on BF, and BBN. We measured the rate-level function (response rate as function of stimulus level) for each stimulus. This paper is based on the responses of 28 type IV units. 3. Evidence for low-threshold inhibitory input to type IV units is derived from analysis of rate-level functions at sound levels just above threshold. Notch noise stimuli of the appropriate notch width produce inhibition at threshold in this regime. When BBN is presented, this inhibition appears to summate with excitation produced by energy in the band of noise centered on BF, resulting in BBN rate-level functions with decreased slope and maximum firing rate. A range of slopes and maximal firing rates is observed, but these variables are strongly correlated and they are negatively correlated with the strength of the inhibition produced by notch noise; this result supports the conclusion that a single inhibitory source is responsible for these effects. 4. By contrast, there is a weak (nonsignificant) positive correlation between the strength of the inhibitory effect of notch noise and the slope/maximal firing rate in response to narrowband stimuli, including BF tones. The contrast between this positive nonsignificant correlation and the significant negative correlation mentioned above suggests that more than one inhibitory effect operates: specifically, the type II input is responsible for inhibition by narrowband stimuli and a different inhibitory source, the WBI, produces inhibition by notch stimuli. 5. Several lines of evidence are given to show that type II units cannot produce the inhibition seen with notch noise stimuli.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document