Sensorimotor Integration at the Dorsal Column Nuclei

Physiology ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 231-237
Author(s):  
Jorge Mariño ◽  
Luis Martinez ◽  
Antonio Canedo
Keyword(s):  
Sensorimotor Integration ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Central Zone ◽  
Spatial Localization ◽  
Peripheral Zone ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Primary Afferents ◽  
Zone Of Inhibition ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Recurrent Collaterals

Interaction among primary afferents, corticofugal fibers, and intrinsic elements allows for sensorimotor integration at the dorsal column nuclei. The interneurons permit the spatial localization, the recurrent collaterals synchronize the activity of projecting cells with overlapping receptive fields, and the corticofugal fibers induce a central zone of activity surrounded by a peripheral zone of inhibition.

Lateral cervical nucleus in the cat: functional organization and characteristics

1978 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 1511-1534 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D. Craig ◽  
D. N. Tapper
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Receptor Type ◽  
Noxious Stimulation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Medial Lemniscus ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Lateral Cervical Nucleus ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. The lateral cervical nucleus (LCN) was investigated with extracellular recordings in the anesthetized cat. A total of 556 LCN units were characterized; the locations of most of these were histologically verified. Half of these had receptive fields on the rostral third of the ipsilateral body surface including the face; 14% had fields on the thorax or abdomen, 33% had fields on the hindlimb or tail, and about 3% had receptive fields larger than one limb. 2. The LCN was observed to be somatotopically organized in experiments using angled microelectrode penetrations. Hindlimb units were dorsolateral, forelimb units ventromedial, and face units most medial within the LCN. In regions where LCN cells were present only in the medial portion of the dorsolateral funiculus, they were all forelimb units. 3. A special subpopulation (17%) of cells were clustered most ventromedially in the LCN. These units had large or disjoint receptive fields, and/or responded to deep, visceral, or noxious stimulation. A third of these did not project in the medial lemniscus (ML); many were synaptically activated by stimulation of the ML. Those that did project in the ML had significantly longer latencies than all other LCN units. It is suggested that this subpopulation contains local LCN interneurons. 4. The specific mechanoreceptor inputs were identified for each of 121 projecting LCN units. Receptor inputs were uniform across each receptive field; that is, each unit that responded to a given receptor type was observed to respond to receptors of that type throughout its receptive field. Input from large-fiber-diameter, velocity-sensitive mechanoreceptors was predominant. The absence of input from slowly adapting type I and II receptors and from joint receptors was confirmed. A significant number of units (17.3%) could be driven by only one receptor type. The LCN sample profile agrees closely with the receptor representation in the hindlimb portion of the spinocervical tract. It is concluded that these data that anatomic specification of convergence occurs in the LCN with respect to receptor connectivity, and that this specification originates in lamina IV of the dorsal horn. 5. Stimulation of the dorsal column nuclei synaptically excited 23% of the LCN units tested. In two cases it was possible to demonstrate, by collision, that this occurred via collaterals of spinocervical tract axons. It is concluded that some spinocervical axons have collaterals terminating in the rostral parts of the dorsal column nuclei.

A thalamic terminus of the lateral cervical nucleus: the lateral division of the posterior nuclear group

1986 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 1498-1520 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. S. Metherate ◽  
D. C. da Costa ◽  
P. Herron ◽  
R. W. Dykes
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Frontal Plane ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Excitatory Input ◽  
The Body ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Posterior Thalamus ◽  
Afferent Fibers ◽  
Lateral Cervical Nucleus ◽  
Nuclear Group

The submodality and receptive field properties of single units in the lateral cervical nucleus (LCN) of barbiturate anesthetized cats were studied with glass microelectrodes. In other experiments, a region of the posterior thalamus containing neurons with properties comparable to those seen in the LCN was examined with tungsten microelectrodes. The responses of most units in the LCN reflected a major input from large myelinated afferent fibers innervating guard hairs but no input from Pacinian afferent fibers. The large size of the receptive fields indicated that excitatory input converged selectively from afferent fibers serving hairs over large areas of the body. In the posterior thalamus rapidly adapting neurons characterized by very large receptive fields and driven by the movement of guard hairs were observed to a region identified histologically as the rostral extension of the lateral division of the posterior nuclear group (POl). Caudally this region was located immediately adjacent to the dorsolateral part of the ventroposterior inferior nucleus (VPI). In more rostral parts of the thalamus it was located more dorsally and the ventroposterior lateral nucleus intervened between it and the VPI. This region was less than 1 mm wide in the frontal plane but extended rostrocaudally for several millimeters. Horseradish peroxidase injected into the region of the VPI and the POl labeled many cells in the LCN and the caudal pole of the dorsal column nuclei demonstrating that neurons in the LCN relay information to this part of the thalamus. These data, plus previous experiments showing that the VPI receives a major projection from the caudal poles of the dorsal column nuclei, suggest that the rostral portion of the POl receives an important afferent supply from the LCN. The responses of neurons in the POl appear to arise from specific classes of sensory receptors and cannot be considered less precise or more primitive than responses observed in the ventroposterior nucleus of the thalamus.

scholarly journals The Dorsal Column Nuclei Neuroanatomy Reveals A Complex Sensorimotor Integration and Distribution Hub

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alastair J. Loutit ◽  
Richard M. Vickery ◽  
Jason R. Potas
Keyword(s):  
Sensorimotor Integration ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Proprioceptive Information ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Diverse Range ◽  
Somatosensory Information ◽  
Functional Implications ◽  
Complex Integration ◽  
Sensorimotor Information ◽  
Afferent Inputs

The dorsal column nuclei (DCN) are organised by both somatotopy and modality, and have a diverse range of afferent inputs and projection targets. The functional organisation and connectivity of the DCN implicate them in a variety of sensorimotor functions, beyond their commonly accepted role in processing and transmitting somatosensory information to the thalamus, yet this is largely underappreciated in the literature. In this review, we examine the morphology, organisation, and connectivity of the DCN and their associated nuclei, to improve understanding of their sensorimotor functions. First, we briefly discuss the receptors, afferent fibres, and pathways involved in conveying tactile and proprioceptive information to the DCN. Next, we review the modality and somatotopic arrangements of the constituents of the dorsal column nuclei complex (DCN-complex), which includes the gracile, cuneate, external cuneate, X, and Z nuclei, and Bischoff’s nucleus. Finally, we examine and discuss the functional implications of the myriad of DCN-complex projection targets throughout the midbrain, and hindbrain, in addition to their modulatory inputs from the cortex. The organisation and connectivity of the DCN-complex suggest that these nuclei should be considered a complex integration and distribution hub for sensorimotor information.

Control of Size and Excitability of Mechanosensory Receptive Fields in Dorsal Column Nuclei by Homolateral Dorsal Horn Neurons

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 120-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Dykes ◽  
A. D. Craig
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Receptive Field ◽  
Dorsal Horn ◽  
Cobalt Chloride ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
Field Size ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Receptive Field Size ◽  
Dorsal Horn Neurons

Dykes, Robert W. and A. D. Craig. Control of size and excitability of mechanosensory receptive fields in dorsal column nuclei by homolateral dorsal horn neurons. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 120–129 1998. Both accidental and experimental lesions of the spinal cord suggest that neuronal processes occurring in the spinal cord modify the relay of information through the dorsal column-lemniscal pathway. How such interactions might occur has not been adequately explained. To address this issue, the receptive fields of mechanosensory neurons of the dorsal column nuclei were studied before and after manipulation of the spinal dorsal horn. After either a cervical or lumbar laminectomy and exposure of the dorsal column nuclei in anesthetized cats, the representation of the hindlimb or of the forelimb was defined by multiunit recordings in both the dorsal column nuclei and in the ipsilateral spinal cord. Next, a single cell was isolated in the dorsal column nuclei, and its receptive field carefully defined. Each cell could be activated by light mechanical stimuli from a well-defined cutaneous receptive field. Generally the adequate stimulus was movement of a few hairs or rapid skin indentation. Subsequently a pipette containing either lidocaine or cobalt chloride was lowered into the ipsilateral dorsal horn at the site in the somatosensory representation in the spinal cord corresponding to the receptive field of the neuron isolated in the dorsal column nuclei. Injection of several hundred nanoliters of either lidocaine or cobalt chloride into the dorsal horn produced an enlargement of the receptive field of the neuron being studied in the dorsal column nuclei. The experiment was repeated 16 times, and receptive field enlargements of 147–563% were observed in 15 cases. These data suggest that the dorsal horn exerts a tonic inhibitory control on the mechanosensory signals relayed through the dorsal column-lemniscal pathway. Because published data from other laboratories have shown that receptive field size is controlled by signals arising from the skin, we infer that the control of neuronal excitability, receptive field size and location for lemniscal neurons is determined by tonic afferent activity that is relayed through a synapse in the dorsal horn. This influence of dorsal horn neurons on the relay of mechanosensory information through the lemniscal pathways must modify our traditional views concerning the relative independence of these two systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document