scholarly journals Current Limitations and Perspectives in Single Port Surgery: Pros and Cons Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site Surgery (LESS) for Renal Surgery

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Weibl ◽  
Hans-Christoph Klingler ◽  
Tobias Klatte ◽  
Mesut Remzi

Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site surgery (LESS) for kidney diseases is quickly evolving and has a tendency to expand the urological armory of surgical techniques. However, we should not be overwhelmed by the surgical skills only and weight it against the basic clinical and oncological principles when compared to standard laparoscopy. The initial goal is to define the ideal candidates and ideal centers for LESS in the future. Modification of basic instruments in laparoscopy presumably cannot result in better functional and oncological outcomes, especially when the optimal working space is limited with the same arm movements. Single port surgery is considered minimally invasive laparoscopy; on the other hand, when using additional ports, it is no more single port, but hybrid traditional laparoscopy. Whether LESS is a superior or equally technique compared to traditional laparoscopy has to be proven by future prospective randomized trials.

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Igor O Marinkin ◽  
Vasily A Odintsov ◽  
Andrei I Shevela ◽  
Vladimir V Anischenko

A comparison of the results of subtotal hysterectomy performed by various surgical procedures (SILS, laparoscopy). Indications for these types of surgical techniques, identified the advantages and disadvantages of each method of economic feasibility. It is shown that single-port surgery is characterized by the best cosmetic effect and less postoperative pain than with classical laparoscopy. It defines the single-port surgery as a safe method of choice for endoscopic treatment of uterine pathology.


2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (8) ◽  
pp. 1034-1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sashi S. Kommu ◽  
Jihad H. Kaouk ◽  
Abhay Rané

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document