scholarly journals Outcome and Structural Integrity of Rotator Cuff after Arthroscopic Treatment of Large and Massive Tears with Double Row Technique: A 2-Year Followup

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Carbonel ◽  
Angel A. Martínez ◽  
Elisa Aldea ◽  
Jorge Ripalda ◽  
Antonio Herrera
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Massive Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Cuff Repair

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome and the tendon healing after arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears.Methods. 82 patients with a full-thickness large and massive rotator cuff tear underwent arthroscopic repair with double row technique. Results were evaluated by use of the UCLA, ASES, and Constant questionnaires, the Shoulder Strength Index (SSI), and range of motion. Follow-up time was 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed on each shoulder preoperatively and 2 years after repair.Results. 100% of the patients were followed up. UCLA, ASES, and Constant questionnaires showed significant improvement compared with preoperatively (P<0.001). Range of motion and SSI in flexion, abduction, and internal and external rotation also showed significant improvement (P<0.001). MRI studies showed 24 cases of tear after repair (29%). Only 8 cases were a full-thickness tear.Conclusions. At two years of followup, in large and massive rotator cuff tears, an arthroscopic double row rotator cuff repair technique produces an excellent functional outcome and structural integrity.

scholarly journals Minimum Five-Year Outcomes and Clinical Survivorship Following Arthroscopic Double-Row Repair for Full-thickness Supraspinatus Tears

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (7_suppl4) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0007
Author(s):  
Jonas Pogorzelski ◽  
Erik M. Fritz ◽  
Marilee P. Horan ◽  
Zaamin B. Hussain ◽  
Christoph Katthagen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Supraspinatus Tendon ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Survivorship Analysis ◽  
Double Row Repair ◽  
Cuff Repair

Objectives: Rotator cuff tears lead to significant morbidity due to pain and decreased function. Despite the prevalence of cuff repairs, mid-term outcomes have been scarcely reported. The purpose of this study is to report minimum 5-year outcomes and clinical survivorship after double-row rotator cuff repair for full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tears. Methods: Patients at least five years out from arthroscopic double-row repair for a full-thickness cuff tear involving the supraspinatus tendon were included. Pre- and postoperative ASES, SF-12 PCS, QuickDASH, SANE, and satisfaction scores were collected. The relationship between outcomes and (1) tear chronicity, (2) number of tendons involved, (3) type of repair, and (4) primary versus revision procedure, was also evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was conducted defining failures as progression to revision rotator cuff surgery. Results: From November 2005 to February 2012, a total of 189 shoulders were eligible for inclusion. Fifteen shoulders (7.9%) underwent revision rotator cuff repair and were considered failures. Outcomes data were reported at a mean follow-up of 6.6 (range, 5.0-11.0) years. All outcome scores significantly improved from pre- to postoperative time point, including mean ASES (57.9 to 92.9, P < 0.001), SF-12 PCS (43.4 to 52.0, P < 0.001), QuickDASH (35.2 to 10.5, P < 0.001), and SANE scores (61.5 to 86.5, P < 0.001). Acute tears demonstrated significantly better ASES and SANE scores than chronic tears (ASES 95.1 ± 8.9 versus 91.7 ± 11.2, P = 0.025; SANE 89.6 ± 19.9 versus 85.7 ± 21.3, P = 0.042). No other analyzed variable had a significant association with outcomes scores ( P > 0.05). Survivorship analysis demonstrated a postoperative clinical survivorship of the repair of 96.5% at two years and 93.8% at five years (Figure 1). Conclusion: Patients can expect excellent clinical outcomes and a low failure rate following arthroscopic double-row repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears at mid-term follow-up. The repair of acute tears and primary repairs were associated with better postoperative outcomes.

scholarly journals Epidemiological Analysis of Changes in Clinical Practice for Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears From 2010 to 2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 232596711984591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avinesh Agarwalla ◽  
Gregory L. Cvetanovich ◽  
Anirudh K. Gowd ◽  
Anthony A. Romeo ◽  
Brian J. Cole ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Biceps Tenodesis ◽  
Rotator Cuff Injuries ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Corticosteroid Injections

Background: Rotator cuff injuries are a leading cause of shoulder disability among adults. Surgical intervention is a common treatment modality; however, conservative management has been described for the treatment of rotator cuff tears. As the cost of health care increases, the industry has shifted to optimizing patient outcomes, reducing readmissions, and reducing expenditure. In 2010, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons created clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to guide the management of rotator cuff injuries. Since their publication, there have been several randomized controlled trials assessing the management of rotator cuff injuries. Purpose: To quantitatively describe changes in the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears over time with regard to the publication of the CPGs and prospective clinical trials. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Included in the study were Humana-insured patients in the PearlDiver database with the diagnosis of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear from 2010 to 2015. Patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (CPT-29827, CPT-23410, CPT-23412, CPT-23420) and patients undergoing nonoperative management in the queried years were identified. The incidence of physical therapy (PT), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and corticosteroid injections was assessed. Results: In 2015, patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were less likely to receive a corticosteroid injection (16.5% vs 23.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.6; P < .001) or undergo PT (7.8% vs 12.1%, respectively; OR, 0.6; P < .001) before rotator cuff repair in comparison with 2010. Additionally, patients were no more likely to be prescribed NSAIDs before rotator cuff repair in 2015 in comparison with 2010 (OR, 1.0; P = .6). Patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears were less likely to undergo acromioplasty in 2015 in comparison with 2010 (48.2% vs 76.9%, respectively; OR, 0.4; P < .001); however, the rate of concomitant biceps tenodesis slightly increased (14.8% vs 14.6%, respectively; OR, 1.1; P = .01). Conclusion: From 2010 to 2015, there were changes in the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears, including decreased preoperative utilization of corticosteroid injections and PT as well as a decrease in concomitant acromioplasty, and the rate of biceps tenodesis slightly increased. As CPGs and prospective investigations continue to proliferate, management practices of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears continue to evolve.

Repair Integrity and Functional Outcome After Arthroscopic Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair

2007 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 953-960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Sugaya ◽  
Kazuhiko Maeda ◽  
Keisuke Matsuki ◽  
Joji Moriishi
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Double Row ◽  
Cuff Repair

scholarly journals The Effect of Time Interval from MRI to Rotator Cuff Repair on Tear Size: Imaged vs. Actual Tear Size

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0027
Author(s):  
Amanda J. Naylor ◽  
Michael D. Charles ◽  
Allison Jamie Rao ◽  
Gregory Louis Cvetanovich ◽  
Michael C. O’Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Repair ◽  
Critical Time ◽  
T Test ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Cuff Repair ◽  
Tear Size

Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the advanced imaging modality of choice for the evaluation and diagnosis of full thickness rotator cuff tears (RCT). Tear size progression has been correlated with increasing pain. However, there is little data on tear size progression in symptomatic RCT with regard to time from MRI to actual rotator cuff repair (RCR). The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of time (from date of MRI measured tear dimensions to date of RCR measured intraoperative tear dimensions) on tear size progression. Methods: In the course of a study on physical examination manual muscle tests in patients with known full thickness RCT requiring repair, MRI was obtained for each patient undergoing RCR. Tears were measured intraoperatively in the Anterior-Posterior (A-P) and Medial-Lateral (M-L) dimensions with a graduated probe. Location (anterior, central, posterior in the supraspinatus tendon), area of the tear, and anterior band of supraspinatus status (intact/ not intact) were recorded.The preoperative MRI was evaluated by the same examiner blinded to the operative results at least 4 weeks after the RCR and the same parameters measured.There were 64 consecutive shoulders with 40 male, 24 female at an average age of 58 yrs (40-76) that had MRI and underwent RCR. The mean MRI dimensions were: A-P tear:16.53 mm (SD 9.70); M-L tear: 17.3 mm (SD 9.75); Tear area: 366.7 square mm. The average time from preoperative MRI to RCR was 107.3 days (range 12-399 days). Operative mean RCT dimensions were: A-P tear: 18.38 mm (SD 10.0); M-L tear: 14.06 mm (SD 8.15); Tear area: 307.7 square mm.Descriptive statistical analysis with two-sample T-test was performed to determine the temporal effect on tear size from date of MRI to the date of surgery, and whether there was a change.Patients were grouped in the following time cohorts based on the length of time elapsed between the preoperative MRI and date of RCR: ≤1 month, 1 month to 2 months, 2 months to 3 months, 3 months to 9 months, and ≥9 months. The delta, or difference between intraoperative measurements and preoperative MRI measurements, was calculated for each cohort. Results: The t-test revealed a significant time effect with regard to tear size between the MRI and the intraoperative measured tear requiring repair. This was significant for the A-P dimension (p<0.001), the Medial-Lateral dimension (p<0.001), and the total area of the tear (p=0.009). In an attempt to determine a “watershed” or critical time interval where MRI and RCT size correlated, an additional analysis was performed. The change in A-P tear dimension between MRI and RCR findings showed increasing delta with increasing time. Positive mean delta in A-P dimension was seen in the 2-3 month group (2.64), with larger differences seen in the 3 month to 9 month (5.89) and ≥9 month (7.3) groups. A similar trend was seen for mean delta values in the M-L dimension among the cohorts. Conclusion: In a consecutive series of RCTs undergoing repair, the measured MRI dimensions and the intraoperative dimensions were recorded and analyzed. A surgeon can have a level of confidence that the RCT size will correlate with MRI tear size within a certain time frame. There is a significant effect of time on tear size progression from MRI dimensions to actual RCT dimensions at time of repair.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document