scholarly journals Survival Comparison of Patients Undergoing Secondary Aortic Repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Dean J. Yamaguchi ◽  
Thomas C. Matthews ◽  
Marjan Mujib ◽  
Marc A. Passman ◽  
Mark A. Patterson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Aortic Interventions ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Introduction. Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair warrants lifelong surveillance. Secondary aortic intervention (SAI) outcomes may be affected by the therapeutic approach. We compared short- and long-term mortality in patients who underwent SAIs after initial aortic repair, either endovascular (EVAR) or open. Methods. Patients who underwent AAA repair between 1986 and 2010 were retrospectively identified in a vascular surgery database as well as those who underwent SAIs. All-cause mortality and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated. Results. We identified 149 patients who underwent either open AAA repair or EVAR followed by open or endovascular SAI. Seventy-seven patients (51.7%) underwent initial EVAR while 72 patients (48.3%) underwent open repair. Sixty (78%) initial EVAR patients underwent secondary EVAR while 17 (22%) patients had an open SAI. Initial open repair patients were evenly distributed between EVAR and open SAIs. Compared to EVAR, patients who underwent initial open repair had longer intervals between primary aortic interventions (PAIs) and SAIs. Multivariable-adjusted all-cause mortality was significantly higher for patients who underwent initial open AAA repair followed by EVAR when compared to patients who underwent endovascular PAI and SAI. Conclusion. Long-term mortality in patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms who require SAI may be improved by an EVAR-first algorithm.

scholarly journals Improved outcomes from endovascular aortic repair in younger patients: Towards improved risk stratification

Vascular ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 573-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wan Chin Hsieh ◽  
Chung Dann Kan ◽  
Chong Chao Hsieh ◽  
Mohamed Omara ◽  
Brandon Michael Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Objectives Abdominal aortic aneurysms are conventionally treated by open repair surgery. While endovascular aortic repair improves survival in high-risk patients, younger patients (40–65 years) potentially at lower risk with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing endovascular aortic repair usually have poorer post-operative outcomes and require longer term follow-up. In this study, clinical data on younger patients were analyzed to investigate whether endovascular aortic repair leads to poorer short- and long-term outcomes. Methods This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of articles comparing clinical outcomes in patients aged 40–65 years undergoing open repair or endovascular aortic repair and published between 2000 and 2017. In-hospital mortality, long-term mortality, and post-operative complication data were retrieved from eligible studies and clinical outcomes were compared. Twenty-one retrospective cohort analyses were included, accounting for 250,837 patients (149,051 endovascular aortic repair; 101,786 open repair). Risk ratios were pooled using the DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. All statistical analyses were performed in Review Manager 5.3. Results Younger patients with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing endovascular aortic repair had a significantly reduced 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) = 0.40, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.28–0.57; p < 0.00001), long-term mortality (OR = 0.37, 95% CI 0.17–0.82; p = 0.01), incidence of reintervention (OR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.34–0.66; p < 0.0001), and incidence of renal failure (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.37–1.82; p < 0.00001). Conclusions Endovascular aortic repair may improve short- and long-term survival and reduce post-operative complications in younger patients with asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Delayed Paraplegia Following Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Endograft Placement: Case Report and Literature Review

Vascular ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Fortes ◽  
B. Zane Atkins ◽  
Andy C. Chiou
Keyword(s):  
Open Repair ◽  
Spinal Cord Ischemia ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Made In

The treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) has changed over the past 12 years, with increased numbers of endovascular procedures being performed. Early morbidity is decreased following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with open repair, and long-term studies of EVAR have focused on freedom from death, rupture, and conversion to open repair. Other less commonly encountered complications of EVAR are rarely reported. For instance, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is a devastating complication infrequently seen after open AAA repair. This report discusses a case of delayed paraplegia after EVAR and reviews the pertinent literature. The incidence of SCI after EVAR is similar to open repair, but the mechanisms may be different. Atheroembolization and occlusion of pelvic inflow appear to be the predominant etiologies for SCI after EVAR. Careful consideration of the potential for SCI should be made in elderly patients undergoing EVAR, particularly if difficult arterial anatomy is present.

scholarly journals QT prolongation predicts short-term mortality independent of comorbidity

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 1254-1260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Gibbs ◽  
Jacob Thalamus ◽  
Doris Tove Kristoffersen ◽  
Martin Veel Svendsen ◽  
Øystein L Holla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Main Diagnosis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Short Term Mortality ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Mortality Hazard Ratio ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Abstract Aims A prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc) ≥500 ms is associated with high all-cause mortality in hospitalized patients. We aimed to explore any difference in short- and long-term mortality in patients with QTc ≥500 ms compared with patients with QTc <500 ms after adjustment for comorbidity and main diagnosis. Methods and results Patients with QTc ≥500 ms who were hospitalized at Telemark Hospital Trust, Norway between January 2007 and April 2014 were identified. Thirty-day and 3-year all-cause mortality in 980 patients with QTc ≥500 ms were compared with 980 patients with QTc <500 ms, matched for age and sex and adjusting for Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), previous admissions, and main diagnoses. QTc ≥500 ms was associated with increased 30-day all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38–2.62; P < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in mortality between patients with QTc ≥500 ms and patients with QTc <500 ms who died between 30 days and 3 years; 32% vs. 29%, P = 0.20. Graded CCI was associated with increased 3-year all-cause mortality (CCI 1–2: HR 1.62, 95% CI 1.34–1.96; P < 0.001; CCI 3–4: HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.95–3.21; P < 0.001; CCI ≥5: HR 3.76, 95% CI 2.85–4.96; P < 0.001) but was not associated with 30-day all-cause mortality. Conclusion QTc ≥500 ms is a powerful predictor of short-term mortality overruling comorbidities. QTc ≥500 ms also predicted long-term mortality, but this effect was mainly caused by the increased short-term mortality. For long-term mortality, comorbidity was more important.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document