scholarly journals Is a Single Low Dose of Intrathecal Morphine a Useful Adjunct to Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Pain Control Following Lumbar Spine Surgery? A Preliminary Report

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Yen ◽  
Kim Turner ◽  
David Mark

BACKGROUND: Several studies addressing intrathecal morphine (ITM) use following spine surgery have been published either involving the pediatric population, using mid- to high-dose ITM, or not in conjunction with morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA).OBJECTIVES: To determine whether low-dose ITM is a useful adjunct to PCA for postoperative pain control following elective lumbar spine surgery in adults.METHODS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in a double-blinded randomized controlled trial, and received either ITM or intrathecal placebo. Postoperatively, all patients were given a PCA pump and observed for the first 24 h in a step-down unit. Measurements of: total PCA morphine consumed in the first 24 h; intensity of pain; pruritus; nausea at 4 h, 8 h and 24 h; time to first ambulation; length of hospital stay; and occurrences of respiratory depression were recorded.RESULTS: The total PCA use was significantly lower in the ITM group. There were lower average pain scores in the ITM group, which increased to that of the intrathecal placebo group over 24 h; however, this failed to attain statistical significance. There were no differences in nausea, pruritus, time to first ambulation or hospital length stay. There were no cases of respiratory depression in either group.CONCLUSIONS: ITM may be a useful adjunct to PCA, but did not decrease time to ambulation or length of stay.

2008 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan P. Cata ◽  
Edward M. Noguera ◽  
Emily Parke ◽  
Zeyd Ebrahim ◽  
Andrea Kurz ◽  
...  

Spine ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 609-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kitti Jirarattanaphochai ◽  
Surachai Jung ◽  
Somboon Thienthong ◽  
Wimonrat Krisanaprakornkit ◽  
Chat Sumananont

Neurosurgery ◽  
1986 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Bob Blacklock ◽  
Gary L. Rea ◽  
Robert E. Maxwell

Abstract The analgesic requirements and bladder function of 5 patients who received 1 mg of intrathecal morphine during lumbar spine operation are compared to those of 10 control patients. No analgesics were used by the treatment group for the first 24 hours postoperatively. The test group subsequently required twice the amount of analgesics during the 2nd through 5th days after operation compared to controls. All 5 patients who received intrathecal morphine developed urinary retention for 24 to 36 hours. The brief duration of analgesia, the increased narcotic use after the effects of the morphine dissipated, and urinary retention after a single intraoperative dose of intrathecal morphine suggest caution in using this technique.


1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Padraic O'Neill ◽  
Christine Knickenberg ◽  
Senarath Bogahalanda ◽  
Anthony E. Booth

✓ A randomized prospective double-blind trial of intrathecal morphine for postoperative pain relief following lumbar spine surgery is described. Intrathecal morphine significantly reduced the mean pain score in the postoperative period (p < 0.01) and there was a corresponding significant reduction in the need for additional postoperative analgesia (p < 0.05). The possible mechanism of action of intrathecal morphine and the potential advantages of this technique are discussed. Possible side effects are also considered, and caution is urged until wider experience has been obtained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document