scholarly journals Systematic Review of Focal Prostate Brachytherapy and the Future Implementation of Image-Guided Prostate HDR Brachytherapy Using MR-Ultrasound Fusion

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Sean Peach ◽  
Daniel M. Trifiletti ◽  
Bruce Libby

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy found in North American and European men and the second most common cause of cancer related death. Since the practice of PSA screening has become common the disease is most often found early and can have a long indolent course. Current definitive therapy treats the whole gland but has considerable long-term side effects. Focal therapies may be able to target the cancer while decreasing dose to organs at risk. Our objective was to determine if focal prostate brachytherapy could meet target objectives while permitting a decrease in dose to organs at risk in a way that would allow future salvage treatments. Further, we wanted to determine if focal treatment results in less toxicity. Utilizing the Medline repository, dosimetric papers comparing whole gland to partial gland brachytherapy and clinical papers that reported toxicity of focal brachytherapy were selected. A total of 9 dosimetric and 6 clinical papers met these inclusion criteria. Together, these manuscripts suggest that focal brachytherapy may be employed to decrease dose to organs at risk with decreased toxicity. Of current technology, image-guided HDR brachytherapy using MRI registered to transrectal ultrasound offers the flexibility and efficiency to achieve such focal treatments.

2011 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. S261-S262
Author(s):  
F. Duane ◽  
C. Gillham ◽  
G. Rangaswamy ◽  
L. Walsh ◽  
C. Lyons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  

2014 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. S326-S327
Author(s):  
T. Toita ◽  
T. Kusada ◽  
G. Kasuya ◽  
T. Ariga ◽  
H. Shiina ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Zolciak-Siwinska ◽  
Michal Bijok ◽  
Joanna Jonska-Gmyrek ◽  
Maria Kawczynska ◽  
Lucyna Kepka ◽  
...  

BJR|Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20200067
Author(s):  
Orla Anne Houlihan ◽  
Guhan Rangaswamy ◽  
Mary Dunne ◽  
Christine Rohan ◽  
Louise O'Neill ◽  
...  

Objective: Radiotherapy plays an important role in the management of lymphoma and many patients with lymphoma are cured with treatment. Risk of secondary malignancy and long-term cardiac and pulmonary toxicity from mediastinal radiotherapy exists. Delivery of radiotherapy using a deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique increases lung volume and has the potential to reduce dose to heart and lungs. We undertook a prospective study to assess the dosimetric differences in DIBH and free breathing (FB) plans in patients requiring mediastinal radiotherapy in clinical practice. Methods: We performed both FB and DIBH planning scans on 35 consecutive patients with mediastinal lymphoma needing radiotherapy. Contours and plans were generated for both data sets and dosimetric data were compared. All patients were planned using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Data were compared for FB and DIBH plans with each patient acting as their own control using the related-samples Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: DIBH significantly reduced lung doses (mean 10.6 vs 11.4Gy, p < 0.0005; V20 16.8 vs 18.3%, p = 0.001) and spinal cord maximum dose (20.6 vs 22.8Gy, p = 0.001). DIBH increased breast V4 (38.5% vs 31.8%, p = 0.006) and mean right breast dose (4.2 vs 3.6Gy, p = 0.010). There was no significant difference in heart doses when the entire study cohort was considered, however, mean heart dose tended to be lower with DIBH for upper mediastinal (UM) tumours (4.3 vs 4.9Gy, p = 0.05). Conclusion: Our study describes the potential benefit of DIBH in a population reflective of clinical practice. DIBH can decrease radiation dose to lungs, heart and spinal cord, however, may increase dose to breasts. DIBH is not always superior to FB, and the clinical significance of differences in dose to organs at risk in addition to the time required to treat patients with DIBH must be considered when deciding the most appropriate radiotherapy technique for each patient. Advances in knowledge: To our knowledge, this is the largest study comparing DIBH and FB planning for patients with lymphoma receiving mediastinal radiotherapy in clinical practice. It demonstrates the impact of an increasingly common radiotherapy technique on dose to organs at risk and the subsequent potential for long-term radiotherapy side-effects.


2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 924-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Pawlowski ◽  
Eddy S. Yang ◽  
Arnold W. Malcolm ◽  
Charles W. Coffey ◽  
George X. Ding

Brachytherapy ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 124
Author(s):  
Subhakar Mutyala ◽  
Raquibul Hannan ◽  
Nitika Thawani ◽  
Matt Biagioli ◽  
Amella Pollack ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document