scholarly journals Acute Bacterial Suppurative Thyroiditis following Fine Needle Aspiration: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Zaw Win Htet ◽  
E. Shyong Tai ◽  
Samantha Peiling Yang

Background. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules is a simple, reliable, and inexpensive procedure performed on suspicious thyroid nodules found in thyroid ultrasound (US). Acute bacterial suppurative thyroiditis is an uncommon complication of FNA which, however, can be life threatening. Case Presentation. A 49-year-old lady presented with fever and neck pain 1 month after FNA with biochemical evidence of thyrotoxicosis. Repeat US of the thyroid showed interval enlargement of the thyroid nodule, and the culture of the cystic fluid of repeat FNA grew Propionibacterium acnes. She responded well to bedside aspiration and 2 weeks of antibiotic therapy without requiring surgical intervention. Discussion. Acute bacterial suppurative thyroiditis following FNA has been increasingly reported in immunocompetent hosts. There are 2 peculiar features in our case: a smoldering course caused by an indolent organism and a significant time lag between initial FNA and clinical presentation. On literature review, it was found that the onset of acute bacterial suppurative thyroiditis after FNA can range from a few days to up to 3 months. Clinicians should be aware of this complication even if FNA has been performed a few months ago. Thyroid US and US-guided FNA are useful initial investigations. Conventional management of acute bacterial suppurative thyroiditis has been surgery combined with antimicrobial therapy. However, recently, a more conservative approach has been reported to be effective in the treatment of acute bacterial suppurative thyroiditis as well. Conclusion. Proper infection control practices are necessary in performing the FNA. Initial management (conservative versus surgical) of acute bacterial thyroiditis should be based on the patient’s clinical status and the extent of infective focus.

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (05) ◽  
pp. 213-224
Author(s):  
C. Kobe ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
H. Schicha ◽  
M. Dietlein

Summary:The incidentally detected thyroid nodule using sonography is described as incidentaloma; the most nodules have a diameter up to 1.5 cm. Sonography will detect thyroid nodules in more than 20% of the population in Germany. Epidemiological studies investigating the prevalence of malignancy in such incidentalomas are missing. The incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer is about 3 per 100,000 people and year. However, several monocentric studies have shown a prevalence of malignancy of up to 10% of the thyroid nodules in selected patients’ group. The histology did not found microcarcinomas only, but also small cancer with infiltration of the thyroid capsule, lymph node metastasis or multifocal spread. The studies were not designed for outcome measurement after early and incidental detection of small thyroid cancers. Hypoechogenity, ill defined borders, central hypervascularization or microcalcifications were used as combined criteria for risk stratification. The second method for risk stratification is scintigraphy and further tests are warranted for hypofunctioning nodule ≥1 cm. Additionally, the family history, patient’s age <20 years, former radiation of the neck, and measurement of calcitonin should be regarded. Without such a risk stratification selection for fine needle aspiration is impossible. Fine needle aspiration of non-palpable incidentalomas led to non-representative or unequivocal cytological findings in up to 40%. Because better outcome of incidentally detected small thyroid carcinomas is not proved and because sonography, scintigraphy and fine needle aspiration remain imprecise regarding dignity of incidentalomas, fine needle aspiration is not the standard for small, non-palpable thyroid nodules. Conclusion: For management of incidentaloma, sonographically unsuspicious, scintigraphically indifferent (nodules ≥1 cm) and without any risk factors in patients’ history, wait and see is justified when patient is informed about the problem.


Author(s):  
Silpa Kadiyala ◽  
Poonam Agarwal ◽  
V Suresh ◽  
Amith Chowhan ◽  
AY Lakshmi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manijeh Mohammadi ◽  
Carrie Betel ◽  
Kirsteen Rennie Burton ◽  
Kevin McLughlin Higgins ◽  
Zeina Ghorab ◽  
...  

Objective To determine the incidence of malignancy, follow-up ultrasound (US), and repeat fine needle aspiration (FNA) in thyroid nodules that have been previously biopsied as benign. Methods This is a retrospective, descriptive study of benign thyroid nodules evaluated by US between 2010-2011. We determined the frequency of follow-up ultrasounds and FNAs, mean years of follow-up, interval between follow-up US, change in nodule size, reasons for repeat FNA (rFNA), frequency of thyroidectomy, and thyroid malignancy during 5 years of follow-up. Results A total of 733 benign thyroid nodules were reviewed in 615 patients. Mean years of US follow-up was 3.47 ± 1.65 years; 275 (37.5%) had no follow-up US; 109 (14.9%) had 1 follow-up US; 93 (12.7%) had 2 follow-up US; and 256 (34.9%) had 3 or more follow-up US. Assessment of thyroid nodule size showed that 215 (28.8%) nodules decreased in size, 145 (19.4%) increased in size by less than 50%, and 91 (12.1%) increased in size by more than 50%. Of the 733 nodules, 17 nodules (2.3%) underwent thyroidectomy for which the pathology result of 9 (1.2%) showed malignancy, and 65 (8.9%) thyroid nodules underwent rFNA. When applying the 2015 recommendations for repeat FNA, 35% were done unnecessarily. Conclusion In our sample of initially benign thyroid nodules, only 9 patients (1.2%) had pathology-proven malignancy after a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. Over 30% of patients had more than 3 rUSs. Decreased interval and frequency of rUS should be considered in future guidelines for thyroid management.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (9) ◽  
pp. 853-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen L. Partyka ◽  
Karen Trevino ◽  
Melissa L. Randolph ◽  
Harvey Cramer ◽  
Howard H. Wu

Author(s):  
Hyeung Kyoo Kim ◽  
Soo Young Kim ◽  
Yong Sang Lee ◽  
Euy Young Soh ◽  
Hang-Seok Chang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document