scholarly journals Isolated Large Glenoid Fracture in Acute Glenohumeral Dislocation in the Elderly: A Novel Indication for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Tyler Smith ◽  
Joseph D’Alonzo ◽  
Alfonso Arevalo ◽  
Jack Kazanjian

Case. Two elderly males presented with traumatic shoulder dislocation and bony Bankart fracture consisting of greater than 25% of the glenoid width. Due to several concomitant factors such as polytrauma, activity level, rotator cuff pathology, optimization of comorbidities, risk of complications, and potential for revision surgery, the patients were treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Conclusion. RSA may be a satisfactory treatment option for isolated, large glenoid fractures associated with anterior glenohumeral instability in the elderly. These patients are susceptible to rapid deconditioning with prolonged immobilization and may not be medically suited to undergo the prolonged recovery period associated with open reduction internal fixation or potentially undergo revision operations.

Author(s):  
Yann Sabah ◽  
Lauryl Decroocq ◽  
Marc Olivier Gauci ◽  
Nicolas Bonnevialle ◽  
Devin Byron Lemmex ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yaiza Lopiz ◽  
Carlos García-Fernandez ◽  
María Vallejo-Carrasco ◽  
Daniel Garriguez-Pérez ◽  
Loreto Achaerandio ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1108-1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Andrew Frombach ◽  
Kendra Brett ◽  
Peter Lapner

Acute proximal humeral fractures in the elderly are generally treated non-operatively if alignment is acceptable and in stable fracture patterns. When operative treatment is indicated, surgical fixation is often difficult or impossible to obtain. Hemiarthroplasty has long been the standard of care. However, with its reliance on tuberosity healing, functional outcomes and patient satisfaction are often poor. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has emerged as a new technology for treating proximal humeral fractures but the indications for its use remain uncertain. While not conclusive, the evidence suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty yields more consistent results, with improved forward elevation and higher functional outcome scores. The primary advantages of hemiarthroplasty are improved shoulder rotation and shorter operative time. Complication rates do not vary significantly between the two options. Although higher quality trials are needed to further define the role of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, current evidence suggests that this is a reasonable option for surgeons who are highly familiar with its use.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 437-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Boileau ◽  
Tjarco D. Alta ◽  
Lauryl Decroocq ◽  
François Sirveaux ◽  
Philippe Clavert ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis Gigis ◽  
Alexandros Nenopoulos ◽  
Dimitrios Giannekas ◽  
Roderich Heikenfeld ◽  
Theodoros Beslikas ◽  
...  

Background:Proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients present with severe comminution and osteoporotic bone quality.Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has lately been proven beneficial in treating patients with complex proximal humeral fractures. The above technique is recommended and has better results in elderly than in younger individuals.Methods:We performed a literature search in the databases Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for published articles between 1970 and 2016 using the terms: proximal humerus fractures and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Results:Significant benefits with the use of reverse prosthesis, especially in patients older than 70 years with a proximal humeral fracture, include reduced rehabilitation time as well as conservation of a fixed fulcrum for deltoid action in case of rotator cuff failure.Compared with hemiarthroplasty and internal fixation, reverse prosthesis may be particularly useful and give superior outcomes in older patients, due to comminuted fractures in osteopenic bones.However, significant disadvantages of this technique are potential complications and a demanding learning curve.Therefore, trained surgeons should follow specific indications when applying the particular treatment of proximal humeral fractures and be familiar with the surgical technique.Conclusion:Although long-term results and randomized studies for reverse prosthesis are lacking, short and mid- term outcomes have given promising results encouraging more shoulder surgeons to use this type of prosthesis in proximal humeral fractures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document