scholarly journals Improving the Sense of Gain of Graduate Students in Food Science

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Youling Wan ◽  
Zhiming Guo

Improvement of the sense of gain as an internal driving force is the key factor to improve the training quality of graduate students in food science. Utilizing Jiangsu University graduate students majoring in food science as research samples, this study analyzed the present situation of the “sense of gain” demand. We analyzed the reasonable appeals of graduate students during their study based on fully respecting and advocating students’ right of speech, listened to their opinions and suggestions on higher education, analyzed the main contradictions, and further put forward a series of countermeasures. For improving the graduate students’ sense of gain during the period of study, it is necessary to improve the training quality from the following five aspects: constructing high-quality courses, cultivating people’s responsibilities, implementing “soft elimination” of training links, carrying out diversified extracurricular activities, and developing comprehensive quality. This research is significant in improving the training quality of food science graduate students.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Oluwadara Oluwaseun Alegbeleye ◽  
Wasiu Akinloye Oyebisi Afolabi ◽  
Beatrice Oluwatoyin Opeolu ◽  
Amin Mousavi Khaneghah

Background: Bacterial counts in ready-to-eat foods are a key factor in assessing the microbiological quality and safety of food. Periodic assessment of the microbiological quality of food is necessary to develop a robust database and help to ensure food safety. </P><P> Methods: The bacterial contamination of a total of 336 bread samples collected from two bakeries and 10 vendors in Ojoo Area of Ibadan, Oyo-State, Nigeria (December 2014 -June 2015) was evaluated. The microbiological quality of the bread loaves was investigated using standard microbiological methods (morphological, phenotypic and molecular characterization). </P><P> Results: The results showed that the number of contaminated samples among the vended bread samples was higher than the bakery bread samples and can be summarized as Bacillus megaterium (4.30%), Staphylococcus arlettae (0.005%), Staphylococcus saprophyticus (2.78%), Citrobacter freundii (2.40%), Bacillus flexus (1.64%), Bacillus species (49.59%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (4.12%), Pseudomonas fluorescens (0.92%), Pseudomonas species (0.045%), Escherichia coli (30.44%) Klebsiella sp. (0.040%) and Aeromonas hydrophila (3.72%). </P><P> Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that the bread samples which become contaminated after transport and handling can be considered a potential hazard to human health in the area. More stringent adherence to food safety regulations should be encouraged and enforced by the appropriate authorities. The findings of this study may be adopted to improve the hygienic conditions of bread distribution chain in the area as well as in other regions of the World.


Logistics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Logistics maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 138
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Brain Sciences maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Dairy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-72
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Dairy maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Cosmetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Cosmetics maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Geosciences maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Clean Technologies maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Life maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Games ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Games maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Processes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 211
Author(s):  

Peer review is the driving force of journal development, and reviewers are gatekeepers who ensure that Processes maintains its standards for the high quality of its published papers [...]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document