scholarly journals Research on Low Frame Rate Video Compression Algorithm in the Context of New Media

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yixin Yang ◽  
Zhiqang Xiang ◽  
Jianbo Li

When using the current method to compress the low frame rate video animation video, there is no frame rate compensation for the video image, which cannot eliminate the artifacts generated in the compression process, resulting in low definition, poor quality, and low compression efficiency of the compressed low frame rate video animation video. In the context of new media, the linear function model is introduced to study the frame rate video animation video compression algorithm. In this paper, an adaptive detachable convolutional network is used to estimate the offset of low frame rate video animation using local convolution. According to the estimation results, the video frames are compensated to eliminate the artifacts of low frame rate video animation. After the frame rate compensation, the low frame rate video animation video is divided into blocks, the CS value of the image block is measured, the linear estimation of the image block is carried out by using the linear function model, and the compression of the low frame rate video animation video is completed according to the best linear estimation result. The experimental results show that the low frame rate video and animation video compressed by the proposed algorithm have high definition, high compression quality under different compression ratios, and high compression efficiency under different compression ratios.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernatin T ◽  
Godwin premi M.S. ◽  
Narmadha R ◽  
Sahaya Anselin Nisha A

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2872
Author(s):  
Miroslav Uhrina ◽  
Anna Holesova ◽  
Juraj Bienik ◽  
Lukas Sevcik

This paper deals with the impact of content on the perceived video quality evaluated using the subjective Absolute Category Rating (ACR) method. The assessment was conducted on eight types of video sequences with diverse content obtained from the SJTU dataset. The sequences were encoded at 5 different constant bitrates in two widely video compression standards H.264/AVC and H.265/HEVC at Full HD and Ultra HD resolutions, which means 160 annotated video sequences were created. The length of Group of Pictures (GOP) was set to half the framerate value, as is typical for video intended for transmission over a noisy communication channel. The evaluation was performed in two laboratories: one situated at the University of Zilina, and the second at the VSB—Technical University in Ostrava. The results acquired in both laboratories reached/showed a high correlation. Notwithstanding the fact that the sequences with low Spatial Information (SI) and Temporal Information (TI) values reached better Mean Opinion Score (MOS) score than the sequences with higher SI and TI values, these two parameters are not sufficient for scene description, and this domain should be the subject of further research. The evaluation results led us to the conclusion that it is unnecessary to use the H.265/HEVC codec for compression of Full HD sequences and the compression efficiency of the H.265 codec by the Ultra HD resolution reaches the compression efficiency of both codecs by the Full HD resolution. This paper also includes the recommendations for minimum bitrate thresholds at which the video sequences at both resolutions retain good and fair subjectively perceived quality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document