scholarly journals Existence of periodic solution for first order nonlinear neutral delay equations

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Genqiang Wang ◽  
Jurang Yan

In this paper by using the coincidence degree theory, sufficient conditions are given for the existence of periodic solutions of the first order nonlinear neutral delay differential equation.

Author(s):  
K. C. Panda ◽  
R. N. Rath ◽  
S. K. Rath

In this paper, we obtain sufficient conditions for oscillation and nonoscillation of the solutions of the neutral delay differential equation yt−∑j=1kpjtyrjt′+qtGygt−utHyht=ft, where pj and rj for each j and q,u,G,H,g,h, and f are all continuous functions and q≥0,u≥0,ht<t,gt<t, and rjt<t for each j. Further, each rjt, gt, and ht⟶∞ as t⟶∞. This paper improves and generalizes some known results.


2002 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim R. Al-Amri

We prove sufficient conditions for the oscillation of all solutions of a scalar first-order neutral delay differential equationx˙(t)−cx˙(t−τ)+∑i=1npix(t−σi)=0for all0<c<1,τ,σi>0, andpi∈ℝ,i=1,2,…,n.


2007 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Rath ◽  
N. Misra ◽  
L. Padhy

AbstractIn this paper, necessary and sufficient conditions for the oscillation and asymptotic behaviour of solutions of the second order neutral delay differential equation (NDDE) $$\left[ {r(t)(y(t) - p(t)y(t - \tau ))'} \right]^\prime + q(t)G(y(h(t))) = 0$$ are obtained, where q, h ∈ C([0, ∞), ℝ) such that q(t) ≥ 0, r ∈ C (1) ([0, ∞), (0, ∞)), p ∈ C ([0, ∞), ℝ), G ∈ C (ℝ, ℝ) and τ ∈ ℝ+. Since the results of this paper hold when r(t) ≡ 1 and G(u) ≡ u, therefore it extends, generalizes and improves some known results.


1988 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 459-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. A. Grove ◽  
G. Ladas ◽  
J. Schinas

AbstractWe established sufficient conditions for the oscillation of all solutions of the delay differential equationand of the neutral delay differential equationwhere p, q, r and a are nonnegative constants and n is an odd natural number.


2010 ◽  
Vol 03 (01) ◽  
pp. 31-43
Author(s):  
Zhibo Cheng ◽  
Jingli Ren ◽  
Stefan Siegmund

In this paper we consider a generalized n-th order delay differential equation, by applying Mawhin's continuation theory and some new inequalities, we obtain sufficient conditions for the existence of periodic solutions. Moreover, an example is given to illustrate the results.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Songbai Guo ◽  
Youjian Shen ◽  
Binbin Shi

We are concerned with oscillation of the first order neutral delay differential equation[x(t)−px(t−τ)]′+qx(t−σ)=0with constant coefficients, and we obtain some necessary and sufficient conditions of oscillation for all the solutions in respective cases0<p<1andp>1.


2013 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Hrabalová

Abstract The paper discusses the asymptotic stability region of a discretization of a linear neutral delay differential equation x′(t) = ax(t - τ) + bx'(t - τ). We present necessary and sufficient conditions specifying this region and describe some of its properties.


2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jin-Zhu Zhang ◽  
Zhen Jin ◽  
Tie-Xiong Su ◽  
Jian-Jun Wang ◽  
Zhi-Yu Zhang ◽  
...  

This paper is concerned with nonoscillation of second-order neutral delay differential equation with forcing term. By using contraction mapping principle, some sufficient conditions for the existence of nonoscillatory solution are established. The criteria obtained in this paper complement and extend several known results in the literature. Some examples illustrating our main results are given.


2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Rath ◽  
N. Misra ◽  
P. Mishra

AbstractIn this paper, sufficient conditions are obtained, so that the second order neutral delay differential equation $$ (r(t)(y(t) - p(t)y(t - \tau ))')' + q(t)G(y(h(t)) = f(t) $$ has a positive and bounded solution, where q, h, f ∈ C ([0, ∞), ℝ) such that q(t) ≥ 0, but ≢ 0, h(t) ≤ t, h(t) → ∞ as t → ∞, r ∈ C (1) ([0, ∞), (0, ∞)), p ∈ C (2) [0, ∞), ℝ), G ∈ C(ℝ, ℝ) and τ ∈ ℝ+. In our work r(t) ≡ 1 is admissible and neither we assume G is non-decreasing, xG(x) > 0 for x ≠ 0, nor we take G is Lipschitzian. Hence the results of this paper improve many recent results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document