Abstract P6-13-03: Local Treatment Strategies in Young and Elderly Stage IV Breast Cancer Patients in the USA and The Netherlands

Author(s):  
W van de Water ◽  
E Bastiaannet ◽  
S van de Velde ◽  
OM Dekkers ◽  
JA Margenthaler ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11526-e11526
Author(s):  
Peng-Yu Chen ◽  
Skye H Hong-Chun Cheng

e11526 Background: Stage IV breast cancer is an incurable disease. Systemic therapy is usually the main treatment for these patients. Locoregional therapy, such as surgery or radiotherapy, is controversial. Recent studies suggested locoregional treatments of the primary breast cancer can provide some benefit for these patients. Methods: We conducted a chart review of de novo stage IV breast cancer patients at a cancer center hospital in TAIWAN from 1990 to 2008. A total of 276 patients were reviewed and 268 patients met the inclusion criteria. Tumor characteristics, anti-tumor treatments and survival were analyzed. Results: The median survival of 268 patients was 21.5 months. We divided these patients into two groups. There were 140 patients with less than 21.5 months of survival and 128 patients with more than 21.5 months of survival. In univariate analysis, infiltrating ductal carcinoma (p=0.002), ER-positive (p<0.0001), PR-positive (p<0.0001), and no overexpression of HER2 (p=0.0125) were associated with longer survival. The clinical primary tumor size (p=0.11) and positive axillary lymph node involvement (p=0.61) were not different significantly between two groups. About metastatic site, patients with liver mets (p<0.0001) and lung mets (p=0.025) were associated with shorter survival. Bone mets (p=0.63) was not associated with survival. Patients receiving local treatment of primary tumor, including surgery (p<0.0001) or locoregional radiation (p=0.0034), had longer survival. In multivariate analysis, patients who received surgery of primary breast cancer (HR=0.52, p=0.0006) or received systemic chemotherapy (HR=0.47, p=0.002) had better survival. In subgroup analysis, patients without liver metastasis who received surgery of primary breast cancer had longer overall survival significantly (p<0.0001). In contrast, surgery to the primary breast cancer had no benefit in survival (p=0.91) in patients with liver metastasis. Conclusions: Our institutional experience suggests locoregional treatment for primary breast cancer appear to be beneficial for de novo breast cancer patients, especially those without liver mets.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13065-e13065
Author(s):  
Qian Dong ◽  
Mi Zhang ◽  
Da Jiang

e13065 Background: To analyze the correlation between tumor size and metastatic site in first-diagnosed stage IV breast cancer patients. Methods: Stage IV breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 were screened by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The characteristics of clinical variables were represented by a frequency table, and the Chi-square test was used for comparison. At the same time, the Chi-square test was used to analyze the relationship between tumor size and organ metastasis. Correlation between tumor size and the prognosis of patients was contributed by KM curve and Log-rank test. Results: Regardless of tumor size, the proportion of bone metastasis was higher and brain metastasis was lower in breast cancer patients. There were significant differences in the site of metastases based on different subtype. Luminal A and Luminal B breast cancer had the highest proportion of bone metastases; brain metastasis accounted for the highest proportion in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC); while the incidence of liver metastasis was the highest in Her-2(+) breast cancer. At the same time, the results indicated that Luminal A breast cancer with a tumor size > 5 cm was more likely to develop multi-site metastasis and lung metastasis, while Luminal B breast cancer with a tumor size ≤ 5 cm was more likely to develop liver metastasis. The results also revealed that TNBC patients with a tumor size of 0 - 2cm were more likely to develop bone metastasis than those with a tumor size > 5 cm, and the incidence of lung metastasis in triple-negative patients showed an increasing trend with the increase of tumor size. Conclusions: Based on subtype, we found that there was a significant difference between tumor size and metastatic site in patients with stage IV breast cancer, and the difference was statistically significant. This study provided evidence-based basis for decision-making of stage IV breast cancer treatment.


1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 89-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Colomer ◽  
Alvaro Ruibal ◽  
Matilde Navarro ◽  
Gloria Encabo ◽  
Luis Alfonso Sole ◽  
...  

CA 15.3 is an antigen expressed by human breast carcinoma cells, and defined by two monoclonal antibodies, 115D8 and DF3. We used IRMA to determine the circulating serum levels of CA 15.3 in 1178 subjects with breast cancer, non-breast malignancies, benign diseases and controls. A threshold level of 40 U/ml was established with 140 healthy controls and 650 patients with benign diseases (respectively 0% subjects and 1.5% patients had abnormal antigen levels). Elevated CA 15.3 was found in 12 of 184 patients with malignancies different from breast cancer (6.5%), either epithelial carcinomas with distant metastases, mainly in the liver, or primary liver tumors. Breast cancer patients (n=204) were analysed by prior therapy, UICC stage and WHO response to therapy. Eight of 134 (5.9%) patients with stage II or III breast cancer at presentation and no evidence of disease (NED) had elevated CA 15.3. All of 22 patients with stage IV breast cancer not responding to therapy (SD and PD) had antigen levels > 40 U/ml, as did 10 of 34 (29.4%) stage IV patients in objective response (CR+PR). Three of 14 pretreatment patients had abnormal marker levels, and they later proved to have distant metastases. Serum CA 15.3 values were statistically different (p < 0.01) in NED (20.6 ± 11.2 U/ml), CR+PR (33.5 ± 24.0 U/ml), stable disease (98.8 ± 50.4 U/ml) and progressive disease (> 200 U/ml) breast cancer patients. Our results suggest that circulating CA 15.3 antigen levels agree with the stage of breast cancer and with the response to therapy.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru Wang ◽  
Yayun Zhu ◽  
Xiaoxu Liu ◽  
Xiaoqin Liao ◽  
Jianjun He ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The features and survival of stage IV breast cancer patients with different metastatic sites are poorly understood. This study aims to examine the clinicopathological features and survival of stage IV breast cancer patients according to different metastatic sites. Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we restricted our study population to stage IV breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 to 2015. The clinicopathological features were examined by chi-square tests. Breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared among patients with different metastatic sites by the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable analyses were also performed using the Cox proportional hazard model to identify statistically significant prognostic factors. Results A total of 18,322 patients were identified for survival analysis. Bone-only metastasis accounted for 39.80% of patients, followed by multiple metastasis (33.07%), lung metastasis (10.94%), liver metastasis (7.34%), other metastasis (7.34%), and brain metastasis (1.51%). The Kaplan-Meier plots showed that patients with bone metastasis had the best survival, while patients with brain metastasis had the worst survival in both BCSS and OS (p < 0.001, for both). Multivariable analyses showed that age, race, marital status, grade, tumor subtype, tumor size, surgery of primary cancer, and a history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion Stage IV breast cancer patients have different clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes according to different metastatic sites. Patients with bone metastasis have the best prognosis, and brain metastasis is the most aggressive subgroup.


2010 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Bourgier ◽  
Wassim Khodari ◽  
Anne-Lise Vataire ◽  
Eduardo Lima Pessoa ◽  
Ariane Dunant ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2711-2720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Mudgway ◽  
Carlos Chavez de Paz Villanueva ◽  
Ann C. Lin ◽  
Maheswari Senthil ◽  
Carlos A. Garberoglio ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document