scholarly journals The Reliability of Nipple Aspirate and Ductal Lavage in Women at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer--a Potential Tool for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Biomarker Evaluation

2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 950-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Visvanathan ◽  
D. Santor ◽  
S.Z. Ali ◽  
A. Brewster ◽  
A. Arnold ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 923-929 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Shane Pankratz ◽  
Amy C. Degnim ◽  
Ryan D. Frank ◽  
Marlene H. Frost ◽  
Daniel W. Visscher ◽  
...  

Purpose Optimal early detection and prevention for breast cancer depend on accurate identification of women at increased risk. We present a risk prediction model that incorporates histologic features of biopsy tissues from women with benign breast disease (BBD) and compare its performance to the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT). Methods We estimated the age-specific incidence of breast cancer and death from the Mayo BBD cohort and then combined these estimates with a relative risk model derived from 377 patient cases with breast cancer and 734 matched controls sampled from the Mayo BBD cohort to develop the BBD–to–breast cancer (BBD-BC) risk assessment tool. We validated the model using an independent set of 378 patient cases with breast cancer and 728 matched controls from the Mayo BBD cohort and compared the risk predictions from our model with those from the BCRAT. Results The BBD-BC model predicts the probability of breast cancer in women with BBD using tissue-based and other risk factors. The concordance statistic from the BBD-BC model was 0.665 in the model development series and 0.629 in the validation series; these values were higher than those from the BCRAT (0.567 and 0.472, respectively). The BCRAT significantly underpredicted breast cancer risk after benign biopsy (P = .004), whereas the BBD-BC predictions were appropriately calibrated to observed cancers (P = .247). Conclusion We developed a model using both demographic and histologic features to predict breast cancer risk in women with BBD. Our model more accurately classifies a woman's breast cancer risk after a benign biopsy than the BCRAT.


2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Domchek ◽  
Andrea Eisen ◽  
Kathleen Calzone ◽  
Jill Stopfer ◽  
Anne Blackwood ◽  
...  

Breast cancer risk assessment provides an estimation of disease risk that can be used to guide management for women at all levels of risk. In addition, the likelihood that breast cancer risk is due to specific genetic susceptibility (such as BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations) can be determined. Recent developments have reinforced the clinical importance of breast cancer risk assessment. Tamoxifen chemoprevention as well as prevention studies such as the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene are available to women at increased risk of developing breast cancer. In addition, specific management strategies are now defined for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Risk may be assessed as the likelihood of developing breast cancer (using risk assessment models) or as the likelihood of detecting a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (using prior probability models). Each of the models has advantages and disadvantages, and all need to be interpreted in context. We review available risk assessment tools and discuss their application. As illustrated by clinical examples, optimal counseling may require the use of several models, as well as clinical judgment, to provide the most accurate and useful information to women and their families.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document