Abstract 2561: Tumorigenic and metabolomic impacts of adipose-derived monocyte chemotactic protein-1 in a model of obesity-enhanced, male breast cancer

Author(s):  
Lin Yan ◽  
Sneha Sundaram ◽  
Bret M. Rust ◽  
Matthew J. Picklo ◽  
Michael R. Bukowski
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Yan ◽  
Sneha Sundaram ◽  
Bret M. Rust ◽  
Matthew J. Picklo ◽  
Michael R. Bukowski

Male breast cancer, while uncommon, is a highly malignant disease. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) is an adipokine; its concentration in adipose tissue is elevated in obesity. This study tested the hypothesis that adipose-derived MCP-1 contributes to male breast cancer. In a 2x2 design, male MMTV-PyMT mice with or without adipose-specific Mcp-1 knockout [designated as Mcp-1-/- or wild-type (WT)] were fed the AIN93G standard diet or a high-fat diet (HFD) for 25 weeks. Mcp-1-/- mice had lower adipose Mcp-1 expression than WT mice. Adipose Mcp-1 deficiency reduced plasma concentrations of MCP-1 in mice fed the HFD compared to their WT counterparts. Mcp-1-/- mice had a longer tumor latency (25.2 weeks vs. 18.0 weeks) and lower tumor incidence (19% vs. 56%), tumor progression (2317% vs. 4792%), and tumor weight (0.23 g vs. 0.64 g) than WT mice. Plasma metabolomics analysis identified 56 metabolites that differed among the four dietary groups, including 22 differed between Mcp-1-/- and WT mice. Pathway and network analyses along with discriminant analysis showed that pathways of amino acid and carbohydrate metabolisms are the most disturbed in MMTV-PyMT mice. In conclusion, adipose-derived MCP-1 contributes to mammary tumorigenesis in male MMTV-PyMT. The potential involvement of adipose-derived MCP-1 in metabolomics warrants further investigation on its role in causal relationships between cancer metabolism and mammary tumorigenesis in this male MMTV-PyMT model.


2011 ◽  
Vol 71 (08) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Eggemann ◽  
A Ignatov ◽  
R Stabenow ◽  
G von Minkwitz ◽  
FW Röhl ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
N Besic ◽  
B Cernivc ◽  
J De Greve ◽  
K Lokar ◽  
M Krajc ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 759
Author(s):  
Kyung Joo Park ◽  
Chun Hwan Han ◽  
Jeong Geun Yi ◽  
Joo Hyuk Lee

1999 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 760-762
Author(s):  
Hisatada HIROKAWA ◽  
Wataru RIKIHISA ◽  
Osamu YAMAMOTO ◽  
Yoshinori SUENAGA ◽  
Masakazu ASAHI

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
Francesco Bertagna ◽  
Mattia Bertoli ◽  
Tigu Stela ◽  
Giorgio Saladini ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592095835
Author(s):  
Wei-Ping Li ◽  
Hong-Fei Gao ◽  
Fei Ji ◽  
Teng Zhu ◽  
Min-Yi Cheng ◽  
...  

Background and aims: Male breast cancer is an uncommon disease. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of male breast cancer patients has not been determined. The aim of this study was to explore the value of adjuvant chemotherapy in men with stage I–III breast cancer, and we hypothesized that some male patients may safely skip adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Male breast cancer patients between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database were included. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were used to analyse the factors associated with survival. The propensity score matching method was adopted to balance baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to evaluate the impacts of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival. The primary endpoint was survival. Results: We enrolled 514 patients for this study, including 257 patients treated with chemotherapy and 257 patients without. There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) but not in breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the two groups ( p < 0.001 for OS and p = 0.128 for BCSS, respectively). Compared with the non-chemotherapy group, the chemotherapy group had a higher 4-year OS rate (97.5% versus 95.2%, p < 0.001), while 4-year BCSS was similar (98% versus 98.8%, p = 0.128). The chemotherapy group had longer OS than the non-chemotherapy group among HR+, HER2–, tumour size >2 cm, lymph node-positive male breast cancer patients ( p < 0.05). Regardless of tumour size, there were no differences in OS or BCSS between the chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy cohorts for lymph node-negative patients (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Adjuvant chemotherapy showed no significant effects on both OS and BCSS in patients with stage I (OS: p = 0.100, BCSS: p = 0.858) and stage IIA breast cancer (OS: p > 0.05, BCSS: p > 0.05). Conclusion: For stage I and stage IIA patients, adjuvant chemotherapy could not improve OS and BCSS. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy might be skipped for stage I and stage IIA male breast cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document