Short-Term Psychotherapy for the Borderline Personality Disorder

1981 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel A. Leibovich
2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Wong ◽  
Anees Bahji ◽  
Sarosh Khalid-Khan

Background: Evidence regarding the efficacy of psychotherapy in adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptomatology has not been previously synthesized. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in order to assess the efficacy of psychotherapies in adolescents with BPD symptomatology. Methods: Seven electronic databases were systematically searched using the search terms BPD, adolescent, and psychotherapy from database inception to July 2019. Titles/abstracts and full-texts were screened by one reviewer; discrepancies were resolved via consensus. We extracted data on BPD symptomatology, including BPD symptoms, suicide attempts, nonsuicidal self-injury, general psychopathology, functional recovery, and treatment retention. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Results: Of 536 papers, seven trials (643 participants) were eligible. Psychotherapy led to significant short-term improvements in BPD symptomatology posttreatment ( g = −0.89 [−1.75, −0.02]) but not in follow-up ( g = 0.06 [−0.26, 0.39]). There was no significant difference in treatment retention between the experimental and control groups overall (odds ratio [ OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.12, I 2 = 52%). Psychotherapy reduced the frequency of nonsuicidal self-injury ( OR = 0.34, 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.74) but not suicide attempts ( OR = 1.03, 95% CI, 0.46 to 2.30). Conclusions: There is a growing variety of psychotherapeutic interventions for adolescents with BPD symptomatology that appears feasible and effective in the short term, but efficacy is not retained in follow-up—particularly for frequency of suicide attempts.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S46-S46
Author(s):  
O.J. Storebø ◽  
J. Stoffers-Winterling ◽  
J. Mattivi ◽  
B. Völlm ◽  
M.L. Kielsholm ◽  
...  

IntroductionBorderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common and disabling personality disorder associated with difficulties in controlling emotions and impulses, self-injury, feelings of emptiness and abandonment. It is associated with problems in many areas of life, most notably relationships. Psychotherapy is the first-line treatment for people with borderline personality disorder widely used; however, the evidence is not thoroughly investigated. In addition, several specific short-term interventions have been developed during the last decades.ObjectivesWe are currently updating this cochrane collaboration review on psychological interventions for BPD. First findings on the up-to-date evidence relating to short-term psychological interventions will be presented.MethodsWe conducted a cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Any randomized comparisons of psychological interventions versus unspecific control interventions, waitlist or specific psychotherapeutic interventions in adult BPD patients were eligible. Primary outcomes were BPD core pathology as depicted by DSM criteria. Secondary outcomes included depression, anxiety, general psychopathology, dropouts and adverse events. Two independent researchers selected trials, assessed quality and extracted data independently.ResultsThe current evidence of short-term psychological interventions in general and the different types of interventions for which RCT evidence is currently available will be evaluated.Disclosure of interestThe authors declare that they have no competing interest.


2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roy Krawitz ◽  
Wendy Jackson ◽  
Ruth Allen ◽  
Ann Connell ◽  
Nick Argyle ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Rosenbluth

The literature on inpatient treatment of adult borderline personality disorder is reviewed. The controversy regarding the use or avoidance of the regression which can accompany hospitalization is discussed. It is suggested that this literature is not specific enough. There is insufficient attention to definition of terms, clinical heterogeneity and the longitudinal course of the illness. As well, the ahistoric approach to the hospitalization of these patients serves to reinforce characteristic ego deficits. Recommendations regarding the use of long or short-term length of hospital stay are not substantiated by formal research. It is suggested that greater emphasis be placed on aftercare issues. The stabilization of the patient, outpatient therapist, and aftercare system are described as important goals of inhospital care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document