Clinical Efficacy and Safety in Children with Vesicoureteral Reflux of a Single Injection of Two Different Bulking Agents – Polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique) or Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer (Deflux): A Short-Term Prospective Comparative Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 299-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun-Ouck Kim ◽  
Bo Sung Shin ◽  
In Sang Hwang ◽  
Eu Chang Hwang ◽  
Kyung Jin Oh ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hou-Chuan Chen ◽  
Chou-Ming Yeh ◽  
Chia-Man Chou

Endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has become an established alternative to long-term antibiotic prophylaxis and ureteral reimplantation. We present the outcome of endoscopic treatment with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) for VUR in children by a single surgeon at our institute from October 2003 to October 2009. We reviewed the cases of 150 patients (total 239 ureters), 56 girls (37%) and 94 boys (63%), with a mean age of 2.2 years and a median followup of 2.5 years (range 3–68 months). Among the 239 ureters treated, 67.4% (161/239) were cured with a single injection, and a second and third injection raised the cure rate to 86.6% (207/239) and 88.3% (211/239), respectively. None had postoperative ureteral obstruction.


2021 ◽  
pp. 2021063
Author(s):  
Surabhi Dayal ◽  
Satbir Singh ◽  
Priyadarshini Sahu

Background: Both salicylic acid (SA) and trichloroacetic acid (TCA) have proven efficacy with goodsafety profiles in the treatment of acne vulgaris. Objectives: This study compared the clinical efficacy and safety of 25% TCA and 30% SA peels in thetreatment of mild and moderate acne vulgaris. Methods: Patients with mild or moderate acne vulgaris were randomized into 2 groups of 25 personseach, and treated with either the TCA peel or the SA peel at 2-week intervals for 12 weeks. Evaluationof active acne was done by individual lesion counts (comedones, papules and pustules) and calculationof the Michaelsson acne score (MAS). Results: Both peels led to significant decrease in individual lesion counts and MAS compared to baselinevalues, without significant differences between the treatment groups. Thus, the peels had equivalentefficacy against acne vulgaris. The TCA peel was better in treating non-inflammatory lesions,while the SA peel was better for inflammatory lesions, but the differences were not significant. Noserious adverse effects were recorded, but more patients in the TCA peel group experienced burningand stinging sensations. Conclusion: The efficacy of 25% TCA is comparable to that of 30% SA in mild-to-moderate acnevulgaris, but safety and tolerability were better with the SA peel than TCA peel.


2006 ◽  
Vol 176 (4S) ◽  
pp. 1861-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kitchens ◽  
Eugene Minevich ◽  
William DeFoor ◽  
Pramod Reddy ◽  
Jeffrey Wacksman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document