Clinical Trial Transparency and Orphan Drug Development: Recent Trends in Data Sharing by the Pharmaceutical Industry

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 322-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. So ◽  
Y. Joly ◽  
B.M. Knoppers
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Proteesh Rana ◽  
Shalini Chawla

Abstract Research in rare diseases has contributed substantially toward the current understanding in the pathophysiology of the common diseases. However, medical needs of patients with rare diseases have always been neglected by the society and pharmaceutical industries based on their small numbers and unprofitability. The Orphan Drug Act (1983) was the first serious attempt to address the unmet medical needs for patients with rare diseases and to provide impetus for the pharmaceutical industry to promote orphan drug development. The process of drug development for rare diseases is no different from common diseases but involves significant cost and infrastructure. Further, certain aspect of drug research may not be feasible for the rare diseases. The drug-approving authority must exercise their scientific judgment and ensure due flexibility while evaluating data at various stages of orphan drug development. The emergence of patent cliff combined with the government incentives led the pharmaceutical industry to realize the good commercial prospects in developing an orphan drug despite the small market size. Indeed, many drugs that were given orphan designation ended up being blockbusters. The orphan drug market is projected to reach $178 billion by 2020, and the prospects of research and development in rare diseases appears to be quite promising and rewarding.


2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Shen ◽  
Gurmit Grewal ◽  
Andre M. Pilon ◽  
John C. McKew

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-513
Author(s):  
Susan F. Scharf

AbstractOrphan drugs, essential for die treatment of persons widi rare diseases, generally are unprofitable for manufacturers to develop and market. While congressional and administrative efforts to promote die development of orphan drugs have met widi modest success, application of products liability doctrine to orphan drug sponsors could subvert those efforts. This Note describes die provisions of die Orphan Drug Act and analyzes products liability law with respect to orphan drug litigation. It argues that die goals of tort law support the imposition of liability for design defect, failure to warn and negligence in testing. Finally, die Note acknowledges diat liability costs create disincentives for orphan drug development and suggests mechanisms for reducing manufacturers’ liability concerns.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariam A. Ahmed ◽  
Malek Okour ◽  
Richard Brundage ◽  
Reena V. Kartha

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document