Renal Morphology and Function before and after Shock Wave Lithotripsy at 1.5 T with Gadolinium-DTPA

Author(s):  
E. C. Foerster ◽  
M. Bino ◽  
P. J�ger ◽  
G. K. von Schulthess
Urolithiasis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-351
Author(s):  
Matteo Vittori ◽  
Silvia Baroni ◽  
Pietro Manuel Ferraro ◽  
Giovanni Gambaro ◽  
Renato Morelli ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 860-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. Spengler ◽  
M. Sackmann ◽  
T. Sauerbruch ◽  
J. Holl ◽  
G. Paumgartner

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
M. Nikoobakht ◽  
G. Pourmand ◽  
A. Amidi ◽  
S. Hashemi ◽  
H. Nasseh

1992 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 569-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Munck ◽  
I. Gerquari ◽  
J. T. Møller ◽  
L. I. Jensen ◽  
H. S. Thomsen

Eighteen patients were evaluated before and 5 weeks after the first treatment with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) using abdominal plain radiography, 131I-hippuran probe renography, and 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy. In 6 patients no urolithiasis was present on the post ESWL plain radiograph, in 7 the size had decreased, and in 5 the stone mass was unchanged. The renograms were within normal range in the 6 patients who were cured by ESWL, whereas this was the case for only 4 of the 12 who still had renal calculi. In 2 patients pelvic stones had descended into the ureter after ESWL, and the renograms indicated obstruction. Another 3 patients had ureteral stones, whereas in the remaining 7 patients only pelvic stones were found on the plain radiographs. In no patient did the scintigrams reveal scars. It is concluded that abdominal plain radiography of the urinary tract and probe renography are complementary and sufficient in the monitoring of patients with urolithiasis post ESWL.


Urology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 783-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioannis S. Kardakos ◽  
Demetrios I. Volanis ◽  
Aggeliki Kalikaki ◽  
Vasilleios P. Tzortzis ◽  
Efraim N. Serafetinides ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document