scholarly journals Anatomical and Functional Outcome of Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Subretinal Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for a Macular Subpigment Epithelial Haemorrhage

2017 ◽  
Vol 238 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 106-108
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Fotis ◽  
Raquel Garcia-Cabrera ◽  
Mya Ohn ◽  
Aman Chandra
2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enchun M. Liu ◽  
Rithwick Rajagopal ◽  
Bradley T. Smith ◽  
M. Gilbert Grand

Purpose: To assess the outcomes of patients with large submacular hemorrhage (SMH) due to age-related macular degeneration in this era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 149 eyes of 149 patients receiving pars plana vitrectomy, subretinal tissue plasminogen activator, and gas injection (“surgical group”; n = 80) or anti-VEGF alone (“anti-VEGF group”; n = 69). Changes in visual acuity (VA), number of anti-VEGF injections, and percentage of patients with ≥3 line VA gains are compared between groups. Results: Patients in the surgical group had larger SMH than those in the anti-VEGF group, 30.35 versus 14.57 mm2 ( P < .0001). Both groups experienced similar visual gains (−0.35 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR] vs −0.23 in logMAR, surgical vs anti-VEGF group; P = .36). The percentage of patients gaining ≥3 lines of VA was 55% in the surgical group and 54% in the anti-VEGF group. The surgical group achieved best-recorded VA sooner (3.7 compared to 4.6 months; P = .04) and required fewer injections (3.4 injections vs 4.7 in the anti-VEGF group; P = .001). Conclusion: Surgical intervention was favored for larger hemorrhages of shorter duration. Despite extensive hemorrhage and poor baseline VA, both groups showed similar rate of significant VA improvement.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoujiang You ◽  
Anubhav Saxena ◽  
Xia Wang ◽  
WeeYong Tan ◽  
Qiao Han ◽  
...  

The benefits and safety of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) for patients with mild ischaemic stroke (MIS) are still unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IV-tPA as treatment for patients with MIS. We performed a systematic literature search across MEDLINE, Embase, Central, Global Health and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) , from inception to 10 November 2016, to identify all related studies. Where possible, data were pooled for meta-analysis with odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed-effects model. MIS was defined as having National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≤6. We included seven studies with a total of 1591 patients based on the prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. The meta-analysis indicated a high odds of excellent functional outcome based on the modified Rankin Scale or Oxfordshire Handicap Score 0–1 (OR=1.43; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.79; P=0.002, I2=35%) in patients treated with IV-tPA compared with those not treated with IV-tPA (74.8% vs 67.6%). There was a high risk of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (sICH) with IV-tPA treatment (OR=10.13; 95% CI 1.93 to 53.02; P=0.006, I2=0%) (1.9% vs 0.0%) but not mortality (OR=0.78; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.43; P=0.43, I2=0%) (2.4% vs 2.9%). Treatment with IV-tPA was associated with better functional outcome but not mortality among patients with MIS, although there was an increased risk of sICH. Randomised trials are warranted to confirm these findings.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl S Wilkins ◽  
Neesurg Mehta ◽  
Chris Y Wu ◽  
Alexander Barash ◽  
Avnish A Deobhakta ◽  
...  

ObjectiveFovea-involving subretinal haemorrhage is challenging to manage with uncertain visual outcomes. We reviewed outcomes of patients with fovea-involving macular haemorrhage treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and subretinal tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) with pneumatic displacement.Methods and AnalysisThis is a retrospective interventional case series. All patients with submacular haemorrhage who underwent PPV with subretinal tPA injection were included. Reasons for exclusion encompassed patients who underwent intravitreal tPA injection in the office without surgery, insufficient follow-up or documentation. Primary outcomes of interest were postoperative visual acuity (VA) at month 1 and 3. Secondary outcomes were median VA at month 3 by location of haemorrhage and underlying diagnosis.ResultsThirty-seven total patients were included. The mean age was 68.2 years, with 54.1% (20/37) females. The most common aetiology was exudative macular degeneration (43.2%), followed by undifferentiated choroidal neovascularisation (CNV) (18.9%), polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (18.9%), traumatic CNV (10.8%), macroaneurysm (5.4%) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (2.7%). Median preoperative VA was 20/2000, postoperative month 1 was 20/347 (p<0.01), improving to 20/152 (p<0.01) at month 3. Proportion of patients gaining vision 3+ lines in vision was 15/36 (42%). Mean preoperative central subfield thickness on optical coherence tomography was 512.2 µm for sub-retinal pigment epithelium haemorrhage and 648.2 µm for subretinal haemorrhage (p=0.48). Difference in VA by diagnosis was not significant (p=0.60).ConclusionsPPV with subretinal tPA injection and pneumatic displacement of submacular haemorrhage offers modest visual recovery for a diverse group of patients. Location of haemorrhage or specific diagnosis may not predict outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document