ACCEPT®: A Complementary Anthroposophical Program for the Palliative Treatment of Lung Cancer – Rationale and a Randomized Feasibility Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Silke Schibel ◽  
Marie Steinert ◽  
Harald Matthes ◽  
Christian Grah

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Lung cancer is the oncological disease with the highest mortality worldwide. Health-related quality of life is severely compromised in the majority of patients. While the efficacy of early palliative psychosocial therapy has been demonstrated in several recent studies, appropriate therapy modules could so far not be integrated into daily practice of care. Therefore, an additive multimodal treatment concept for oncological centers was drafted: the Additive anthroposophic integrative medicine Cancer Concept of Early supportive or Palliative lung cancer Treatment (ACCEPT®). <b><i>Patients and</i></b> <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The first module consisted of a 3-month health education program, the second module was a concept of psychosocial interventions, and the third module was a supervised home training program. Between 2017 and 2018, 20 lung cancer patients (UICC IIIB/IV) were included and randomly assigned to treatment (<i>n</i> = 10) or a waiting control group (<i>n</i> = 10). The treatment group started ACCEPT® for 3 months immediately after diagnosis and received also standard oncological care (SOC) while the waiting control group received SOC only for 3 months, followed by ACCEPT® after this period. Health-related quality of life, disease management, disease-specific symptoms, and feasibility of the ACCEPT® were monitored at 4 time points. <b><i>Results:</i></b> 7 out of 10 patients in the treatment group (3 dropped out) and 6 out of 10 in the waiting control group (4 died during the intervention) completed treatment. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Lung cancer patients with high symptom load may benefit from ACCEPT®. The feasibility of this adjunctive therapy was demonstrated. The combination of SOC and ACCEPT® is feasible and applicable to a heterogeneous patient group and should be further evaluated with respect to efficacy and dosing.

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. S160
Author(s):  
S. Perez-Luque ◽  
J. Cacicedo ◽  
L. Delgado Arroniz ◽  
J.M. Praena-Fernandez ◽  
E. Montero ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nai-Wen Chang ◽  
Kuan- Chia Lin ◽  
Wen-Hu Hsu ◽  
Shih-Chun Lee ◽  
James Yi-Hsin Chan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1265-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieling Elaine Chen ◽  
Vivian Weiqun Lou ◽  
Hong Jian ◽  
Zhen Zhou ◽  
Meiqiong Yan ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 973-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jolanda M. Habraken ◽  
Gerben ter Riet ◽  
Justin M. Gore ◽  
Michael A. Greenstone ◽  
Els J.M. Weersink ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document