Efficacy of Alveolar Vertical Distraction Osteogenesis and Autogenous Bone Grafting for Dental Implants: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung-In Yun ◽  
Hyungkil Choi ◽  
Robert Wright ◽  
Hyeong Ahn ◽  
Brian Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Autogenous Bone Grafting ◽  
Vertical Distraction Osteogenesis

Stereologic Analysis of Bone Produced by Distraction Osteogenesis or Autogenous Bone Grafting in Mandible

2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 735-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilüfer Çakr-Özkan ◽  
Ahmet Eyibilen ◽  
Fatih Özkan ◽  
Birsen Özyurt ◽  
Hüseyin Aslan
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Autogenous Bone Grafting ◽  
Stereologic Analysis

Implant Success in Distracted Bone Versus Autogenous Bone-Grafted Sites

2009 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Elo ◽  
Alan S. Herford ◽  
Philip J. Boyne
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Endosseous Implants ◽  
Autogenous Bone Grafting ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Posterior Maxilla

Abstract Endosseous implants are the treatment of choice for restoring function and reconstructing most edentulous areas of the maxilla and mandible. In general, alveolar bone defects can be reconstructed by either distraction osteogenesis or autogenous bone grafting. After alveolar reconstruction, endosseous implants are used to support and retain the prosthesis for restoration of form and function. Eighty-two consecutive patients requiring alveolar augmentation prior to implant placement were evaluated. All patients were given treatment options for reconstructing their alveolar defects, which included autogenous bone grafting vs distraction osteogenesis. Sixty-five patients received autogenous grafts (anterior iliac crest: 44; retromolar: 17; tibia: 2; chin: 2), and 17 patients underwent distraction osteogenesis prior to implant placement. A total of 184 implants were placed in the autogenous bone-grafted sites and 56 implants in the distracted bone sites. Implants placed in sites restored with autogenous bone grafts had an implant success rate of 97% (178/184), whereas implants placed in distracted bone sites had a success rate of 98% (55/56). In the autogenous grafted group, 3 implants failed in the posterior mandible, one in the anterior maxilla, one in the anterior mandible, and one in the posterior maxilla. In the distraction group, one implant failed in the posterior mandible. Both techniques are associated with good success rates. There was no statistical difference between implant success in autogenous bone vs distracted bone sites in this group of patients.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Reconstructed Sheep Mandibles: Transport Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Autogenous Bone Grafting

2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 1248-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilüfer Çakır-Özkan ◽  
Ahmet Eyibilen ◽  
Fatih Özkan ◽  
Mustafa Yavuz Gülbahar ◽  
Yonca Betül Kabak
Keyword(s):  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analysis ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Autogenous Bone Grafting

Clinical evidence on titanium–zirconium dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (7) ◽  
pp. 842-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Altuna ◽  
E. Lucas-Taulé ◽  
J. Gargallo-Albiol ◽  
O. Figueras-Álvarez ◽  
F. Hernández-Alfaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Clinical Evidence ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Titanium Zirconium

Dental implants combined with sinus augmentation: What is the merit of bone grafting? A systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 1607-1617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaimaa Nasr ◽  
Dagmar E. Slot ◽  
Samah Bahaa ◽  
Christof E. Dörfer ◽  
Karim M. Fawzy El-Sayed
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Sinus Augmentation

scholarly journals Management of Isolated Capitate Nonunion: A Case Series and Literature Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 07 (05) ◽  
pp. 419-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishabh Jethanandani ◽  
Schneider Rancy ◽  
Keith Corpus ◽  
Jeffrey Yao ◽  
Scott Wolfe
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Internal Fixation ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Vascular Supply ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Rare Injury ◽  
Autogenous Bone Grafting

Background Isolated capitate nonunion is rare. No consensus on the appropriate treatment for this condition exists. Case Description We reported two cases of capitate fracture nonunion presenting several months after untreated high-impact wrist trauma. Treatment was delayed as both patients' nonunions were missed on conventional radiographs. Both were ultimately diagnosed with advanced imaging and successfully treated with internal fixation and autogenous bone grafting. The relevant literature pertaining to capitate nonunion was reviewed. Literature Review Immobilization and internal fixation with bone grafting for capitate nonunion have been described in the literature. Loss of vascular supply and progression to avascular necrosis is a concern after capitate nonunion. Clinical Relevance We present two cases and review the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of this rare injury to guide management. Internal fixation with autogenous bone grafting could play a role in management for this rare condition.

Facial Nerve Dysfunction After Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients with Robin Sequence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2022 ◽  
pp. 105566562110707
Author(s):  
Elina Kapoor ◽  
Esperanza Mantilla-Rivas ◽  
Md Sohel Rana ◽  
Marudeen Aivaz ◽  
Daniela Duarte-Bateman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Facial Nerve ◽  
Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mandibular Distraction ◽  
Robin Sequence ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis ◽  
Nerve Dysfunction ◽  
Distraction Rate

Objective Robin Sequence (RS), characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction, is an increasingly recognized diagnosis. An effective surgical intervention is mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO). This study analyzes published evidence regarding facial nerve dysfunction (FND) associated with MDO. Design and Setting According to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was carried out with databases queried in June 2019 using MESH terms, or equivalent terms, as follows: “distraction osteogenesis” and “Robin Sequence”. A review of original Spanish and English articles, were included. Outcome measures included the prevalence of FND; the affected branches; the rate of permanent vs. transient FND; the use of an internal vs. external device; the daily distraction rate; and finally, the overall distraction length. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was conducted to collate results regarding the prevalence of FND and the factors associated with it. Results Of 239 unique studies identified, 19 studies with 729 patients met inclusion criteria; 52 patients developed FND after MDO. A random-effects meta-analysis yielded a pooled prevalence of FND of 6.40%, with moderately heterogeneous studies (I2 = 41%, τ2 = 0.006). Marginal mandibular nerve involvement was most commonly noted. Nine studies reported transient FND, six permanent, one both, and two unspecified. Internal distractors were used in 8 studies and external in 3 and both in 2. Distraction rate was 1.00 to 2.00 mm/day and total distraction length ranged from 13.00 to 22.3 mm. Sample size was the only parameter inversely associated with rate of FND (p = 0.04). Conclusion This analysis of FND associated with MDO for patients with RS demonstrates a lack of consistent documentation. MDO-associated FND does not appear to be uncommon, and permanent dysfunction can occur. This review underscores the importance of thorough documentation to elucidate the mechanism of FND.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document