Abstract 13297: Short-Term Mortality in Patients With Myocardial Injury and Myocardial Infarction Type 1 and Type 2

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Sarkisian ◽  
Lotte Saaby ◽  
Tina S Poulsen ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Axel C Diederichsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Short Term Mortality

Introduction: Troponin elevations occur in a myriad of clinical conditions other than myocardial infarction (MI) and imply a poor prognosis. So far, data comparing the short-term outcome in patients with myocardial injury vs. patients with type 1 or type 2 MI are not available. Methods: Over a 1-year period we prospectively studied hospitalized patients having cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measured on clinical indication. The diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 MI was according to the universal definition involving a rising and/or falling pattern of cTnI values above the decision limit of 30 ng/L. cTnI elevations above this limit in patients without overt myocardial ischemia were defined as myocardial injury. A 1-month follow-up was done with mortality as endpoint. Results: The study covered 1577 consecutive patients with cTnI values >30 ng/L, of whom 360 had a type 1 MI, 119 a type 2 MI and 1089 had myocardial injury. Type 1 MI patients were younger with a median age of 70 (IQR 61-81) yrs, whereas the median ages in type 2 MI and myocardial injury were higher but comparable : 78 (IQR 67-84) vs. 77 (IQR 67-85) yrs. Peak cTnI values, however, were highest in type 1 MI: 3820 (530-19030) ng/L, lower in type 2 MI: 850 (390-3270) ng/L, and smallest in patients with myocardial injury: 90 (50-270) ng/L (p=0.0001). At one-month follow-up 285 patients had died. Mortality in the different subgroups was: 9% (33/360) in type 1 MI, 24% (28/119) in type 2 MI, and 21% (224/1089) in patients with myocardial injury. The results are depicted in the figure (Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank-test; p-value <0.0001). Multivariate COX regression analysis revealed a Hazard Ratio (95%) of 2.1 (1.2-3.7) for type 2 MI and 1.4 (0.9-2.1) for myocardial injury. Conclusion: The short-term mortality in patients with myocardial injury and type 2 MI is almost identical but higher than in patients with type 1 MI. These prognostic findings imply that the clinical distinction between myocardial injury and type 2 MI may be somewhat artificial.

scholarly journals Cardiac Troponin Thresholds and Kinetics to Differentiate Myocardial Injury and Myocardial Infarction

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Wereski ◽  
Dorien M. Kimenai ◽  
Caelan Taggart ◽  
Dimitrios Doudesis ◽  
Kuan Ken Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Diagnostic Threshold

Background: Whilst the 99th percentile is the recommended diagnostic threshold for myocardial infarction, some guidelines also advocate the use of higher troponin thresholds to rule-in myocardial infarction at presentation. It is unclear whether the magnitude or change in troponin concentration can differentiate causes of myocardial injury and infarction in practice. Methods: In a secondary analysis of a multi-centre randomized controlled trial, we identified 46,092 consecutive patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I concentrations at presentation and on serial testing were compared between patients with myocardial injury and infarction. The positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity were determined at the sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL), and rule-in thresholds of 64 ng/L and 5-fold of the URL for a diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction. Results: Troponin was above the 99th percentile in 8,188 (18%) patients. The diagnosis was type 1 or type 2 myocardial infarction in 50% and 14%, and acute or chronic myocardial injury in 20% and 16%, respectively. Troponin concentrations were similar at presentation in type 1 (median [25th percentile - 75th percentile] 91 [30-493] ng/L) and type 2 (50 [22-147] ng/L) myocardial infarction, and in acute (50 [26-134] ng/L) and chronic (51 [31-130] ng/L) myocardial injury. The 99th percentile and rule-in thresholds of 64 ng/L and 5-fold URL gave a PPV of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI] 56-58%), 59% (58-61%) and 62% (60-64%), and a specificity of 96% (96-96%), 96% (96-96%) and 98% (97-98%), respectively. The absolute, relative and rate of change in troponin concentration was highest in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction (P<0.001 for all). Discrimination improved when troponin concentration and change in troponin were combined compared to troponin concentration at presentation alone (area under curve, 0.661 [0.642-0.680] versus 0.613 [0.594-0.633]). Conclusions: Although we observed important differences in the kinetics, cardiac troponin concentrations at presentation are insufficient to distinguish type 1 myocardial infarction from other causes of myocardial injury or infarction in practice and should not guide management decisions in isolation. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01852123

Short-Term Prognosis of Myocardial Injury, Type 1, and Type 2 Myocardial Infarction in the Emergency Unit

2018 ◽  
Vol 131 (10) ◽  
pp. 1209-1219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Putot ◽  
Sophie Buet Derrida ◽  
Marianne Zeller ◽  
Aurélie Avondo ◽  
Patrick Ray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Emergency Unit ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Injury Type

Cardiac troponins and mortality in type 1 and 2 myocardial infarction

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lippi ◽  
Fabian Sanchis-Gomar ◽  
Gianfranco Cervellin
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Assay Sensitivity ◽  
Percentage Difference ◽  
Cardiac Troponins

AbstractBackground:The pathogenesis of different types of myocardial infarction (MI) differs widely, so that accurate and timely differential diagnosis is essential for tailoring treatments according to the underlying causal mechanisms. As the measurement of cardiac troponins is a mainstay for diagnosis and management of MI, we performed a systematic literature analysis of published works which concomitantly measured cardiac troponins in type 1 and 2 MI.Methods:The electronic search was conducted in Medline, Scopus and Web of Science using the keywords “myocardial infarction” AND “type(-)2” OR “type II” AND “troponin” in “Title/Abstract/Keywords”, with no language restriction and date limited from 2007 to the present.Results:Overall, 103 documents were identified, but 95 were excluded as precise comparison of troponin values in patients with type 1 and 2 MI was unavailable. Therefore, eight studies were finally selected for our analysis. Two studies used high-sensitivity (HS) immunoassays for measuring cardiac troponin T (HS-TnT), one used a HS immunoassay for measuring cardiac troponin I (HS-TnI), whereas the remaining used conventional methods for measuring TnI. In all studies, regardless of type and assay sensitivity, troponin values were higher in type 1 than in type 2 MI. The weighted percentage difference between type 1 and 2 MI was 32% for TnT and 91% for TnI, respectively. Post-discharge mortality obtained from pooling individual data was instead three times higher in type 2 than in type 1 MI.Conclusions:The results of our analysis suggest that the value of cardiac troponins is consistently higher in type 1 than in type 2 MI.

Understanding cardiac troponin part 1: avoiding troponinitis

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Body ◽  
Edward Carlton
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Supply And Demand ◽  
Clinical Context ◽  
Serial Sampling ◽  
Artery Disease

Cardiac troponin (cTn) is a highly specific biomarker of myocardial injury and is central to the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). By itself, however, cTn cannot identify the cause of myocardial injury. ‘Troponinitis’ is the condition that leads clinicians to falsely assign a diagnosis of AMI based only on the fact that a patient has an elevated cTn concentration. There are many causes of myocardial injury other than AMI. Clinicians are required to differentiate myocardial injury caused by AMI from other causes.In part 1 of this series on cTn, we provide a structured overview to help practising clinicians to interpret ‘positive’ cTn results appropriately. There are three core principles. First, when reviewing a cTn result, clinicians must carefully consider the clinical context. Only this can distinguish primary (termed type 1) AMI caused by coronary artery disease from secondary (termed type 2) AMI caused by another condition with an imbalance in the supply and demand of oxygen to the myocardium. Second, clinicians must consider the patient’s baseline condition in order to determine the presence or absence of factors that may predict a chronic cTn elevation. Third, clinicians should routinely use serial sampling to detect a change of cTn that is expected in patients with acute (rather than chronic) myocardial injury. Using these simple principles, clinicians can avoid underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of AMI.

scholarly journals Discordance between ICD-Coded Myocardial Infarction and Diagnosis according to the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction

2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 415-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Díaz-Garzón ◽  
Yader Sandoval ◽  
Stephen W Smith ◽  
Sara Love ◽  
Karen Schulz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Healthcare Management ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Kappa Index ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract BACKGROUND International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding is the standard diagnostic tool for healthcare management. At present, type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) classification by the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (MI) remains ignored in the ICD system. We determined the concordance for the diagnosis of MI using ICD-9 coding vs the Universal Definition. METHODS Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) was measured by both contemporary (cTnI) and high-sensitivity (hs-cTnI) assays in 1927 consecutive emergency department (ED) patients [Use of TROPonin In Acute coronary syndromes (UTROPIA) cohort] who had cTnI ordered on clinical indication. All patients were adjudicated using both contemporary and hs-cTnI assays. The Kappa index and McNemar test were used to assess concordance between ICD-9 code 410 and type 1 MI (T1MI) and type 2 MI (T2MI). RESULTS Among the 249 adjudicated MIs using the contemporary cTnI, only 69 (28%) were ICD-coded MIs. Of 180 patients not ICD coded as MI, 34 (19%) were T1MI and 146 (81%) were T2MI. For the ICD-coded MIs, 79% were T1MI and 21% were T2MI. A fair Kappa index, 0.386, and a McNemar difference of 0.0892 (P &lt; 0.001) were found. Among the 207 adjudicated MIs using the hs-cTnI assay, 67 (32%) were ICD coded as MI. Of the 140 patients not ICD coded as MI, 27 (19%) were T1MI and 113 (81%) were T2MI. For the ICD-coded MIs, 85% were T1MI and 15% T2MI. A moderate Kappa index, 0.439, and a McNemar difference of 0.0674 (P &lt; 0.001) were found. CONCLUSIONS ICD-9–coded MIs captured only a small proportion of adjudicated MIs, primarily from not coding T2MI. Our findings emphasize the need for an ICD code for T2MI.

scholarly journals Treatment and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury compared with type 1 myocardial infarction

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel R. Smilowitz ◽  
Pritha Subramanyam ◽  
Eugenia Gianos ◽  
Harmony R. Reynolds ◽  
Binita Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Myocardial Injury

scholarly journals No additional value of conventional and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin over clinical scoring systems in the differential diagnosis of type 1 vs. type 2 myocardial infarction

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 702-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano Consuegra-Sánchez ◽  
Juan José Martínez-Díaz ◽  
Luis García de Guadiana-Romualdo ◽  
Samantha Wasniewski ◽  
Patricia Esteban-Torrella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Cardiac Troponin ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
St Segment ◽  
Clinical Scoring

AbstractBackground:The distinction of type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is of major clinical importance. Our aim was to evaluate the diagnostic ability of absolute and relative conventional cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in the distinction between type 1 and type 2 MI in patients presenting at the emergency department with non-ST-segment elevation acute chest pain within the first 12 h.Methods:We measured cTnI (Dimension Vista) and hs-cTnT (Cobas e601) concentrations at presentation and after 4 h in 200 patients presenting with suspected acute MI. The final diagnosis, based on standard criteria, was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists.Results:One hundred and twenty-five patients (62.5%)were classified as type 1 MI and 75 (37.5%) were type 2 MI. In a multivariable setting, age (relative risk [RR]=1.43, p=0.040), male gender (RR=2.22, p=0.040), T-wave inversion (RR=8.51, p<0.001), ST-segment depression (RR=8.71, p<0.001) and absolute delta hs-cTnT (RR=2.10, p=0.022) were independently associated with type 1 MI. In a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the discriminatory power of absolute delta cTnI and hs-cTnT was significantly higher compared to relative c-TnI and hs-cTnT changes. The additive information provided by cTnI and hs-cTnT over and above the information provided by the “clinical” model was only marginal.Conclusions:The diagnostic information provided by serial measurements of conventional or hs-cTnT is not better than that yielded by a simple clinical scoring model. Absolute changes are more informative than relative troponin changes.

scholarly journals Association between Variation of Troponin and Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction before and after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Xiaoxiao Zhao ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Chen Liu ◽  
Peng Zhou ◽  
Zhaoxue Sheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Angina Pectoris ◽  
Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Discrimination Power ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Background. Circulating levels of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were considered as prognostic factors for predicting the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). △cTnI is the difference between peak cTnI after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) and cTnI on initial admission. Purpose. This study aimed to assess the relationship between △cTnI, the ratio of △cTnI to cTnI on initial admission, and the incidence of MACE during the follow-up period. Methods. A total of 2596 patients with cTnI measured upon admission and one-time measurement of cTnI during hospitalization were enrolled. Results. In the adjusted models of the survival receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, △cTnI and the ratio of △cTnI to cTnI on initial admission have stronger discrimination power of MACE (area under curve (AUC) 0.730 and 0.717) compared with peak cTnI after PPCI and cTnI at admission (AUC 0.590, 0.546). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified △cTnI (hazard ratio (HR) 1.018, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.001 to 1.035) as a relevant factor for MACE during follow-up. △cTnI was divided into quartiles, and maximum △ cTnI between 4.845 and 19.073 ng/ml comprised more patients with anterior wall myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), higher GRACE score (p = 0.038), CK-MB (p = 0.023), and Myoglobin (p < 0.001). On the K–M survival curves, the incidence of MACE, mortality, and angina pectoris were significantly higher in the group with maximum △cTnI (p = 0.035, 0.049, 0.026). Conclusion. The △cTnI level and the ratio of △cTnI have stronger discrimination power of predicting the incidence of MACE. The group with maximum △cTnI has higher incidence of MACE, mortality, and angina pectoris during the follow-up period.

P1730Serial high-sensitivity troponin I measurements to discriminate type 2 from type 1 myocardial infarction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D A Psyrakis ◽  
J Bormann ◽  
B Von Jeinsen ◽  
J S Wolter ◽  
M Weferling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Absolute Change ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
High Sensitivity Troponin ◽  
Rule Out

Abstract Background Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. A robust differentiation between type 1 and type 2 MI (T1/T2MI) has prognostic and therapeutic implications. We investigated whether serial high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I measurements could reliably discriminate T1MI from T2MI in patients presenting with a non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods We used data from a prospective acute coronary syndrome biomarker registry of patients with suspected MI that presented at or were transferred to one of two study centres. Here, we analysed an unselected group of 265 NSTEMI patients (67.2% males). Blood was drawn on admission and after 3 hours. High-sensitivity troponin I (hs-cTnI) was measured in frozen samples by a technician blinded to patient characteristics. T1MI or T2MI was defined as the gold-standard study diagnosis by two independent cardiologists based on all available data according to the Third Universal Definition of MI. Results A diagnosis of T2MI was made in 55 patients (20.8%) in the NSTEMI cohort. T2MI patients did not differ from T1MI patients regarding age, gender, traditional risk factors, or percentage of those with a history of coronary artery disease. Median baseline hs-cTnI levels were higher in T1MI (436.25; IQR 63.7–1918.8 ng/L) than in T2MI patients (48.4; IQR 11.7–305.9 ng/L; p<0.001). Absolute change in hs-cTnI concentration between 0 and 3 h was greater in T1MI than in T2MI patients with Dhs-cTnI 93.6 ng/L (IQR 13.5–815.3 ng/L) vs. 20.4 ng/L (IQR 2.5–106.5 ng/L) (p<0.001). hs-cTnI yielded an area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) curve for identifying T2MI at baseline of 0.71 (IQR 0.64–0.79) and after 3 h of 0.7 (IQR 0.61–0.78).Dhs-cTnI was associated with an AUROC of 0.68 (IQR 0.6–0.76). Regarding a rule-out approach, Youden-optimized cut-offs for hs-cTnI at baseline as well as for the absolute change in hs-cTnI concentration were calculated (186.5 ng/L; 154.4 ng/L). Use of these two criteria yielded a sensitivity of 89% (78–96%) and a negative predictive value of 95% (89–98%) to exclude T2MI. 49 of 55 T2MI patients would have been ruled out using this algorithm. Conclusion Our data show that hs-cTnI concentrations differ between patients presenting with T1 and T2MI. The concentration of hs-cTnI and its change over time has the potential to rule out T2MI and therefore to identify patients who might benefit from an early invasive management. The differentiation between T1MI and T2MI by using hs-cTnI is nevertheless challenging, and further research on specific algorithms is needed. Acknowledgement/Funding 3German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partnersite Rhein Main, Bad Nauheim, Germany

scholarly journals Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction: Clinical Insights

Cardiology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 131 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Paiva ◽  
Rui Providência ◽  
Sérgio Barra ◽  
Paulo Dinis ◽  
Ana C. Faustino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Acute Ischaemia ◽  
Universal Definition ◽  
Definition Of

Aims: The universal definition of myocardial infarction (MI) classifies acute ischaemia into different classes according to lesion mechanism. Our aim was to perform a detailed comparison between these different types of MI in terms of baseline characteristics, management and prognosis. Methods and Results: An observational retrospective single-centre cohort study was performed, including 1,000 consecutive patients admitted for type 1 (76.4%) or type 2 MI (23.6%). Type 2 MI patients were older, had a higher prevalence of comorbidities and worse medical status at admission. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the MI groups (8.8 vs. 9.7%, p = 0.602). However, mortality during follow-up was almost 3 times higher in type 2 MIs (HR 2.75, p < 0.001). Type 2 MI was an independent all-cause mortality risk marker, adding discriminatory power to the GRACE model. Finally, important differences in traditional risk score performances (GRACE, CRUSADE) were found between both MI types. Conclusions: Several important baseline differences were found between these MI types. Regarding prognosis, long-term survival is significantly compromised in type 2 MIs, potentially translating patients' higher medical complexity and frailty. Distinction between type 1 and type 2 MI seems to have important implications in clinical practice and likely also in the results of clinical trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document